As a “Software Engineer”®©™ (at the Common Law; ®©™ as tongue in cheek), educated in a prestigious American university (equivalent to M.I.T. -by their standards-), working as a “software engineer” for high-end open-source web frameworks, many successful and still operating web projects, having
been screwed by “worked for” banks, transnational conglomerate auction houses, fast paced business consulting firms, small business consulting, business development, and “self-employed” (and all of those under false pretenses of what debt as money is and is not; and unconscionable contracts with the UNITED STATES, INC)… and every one of them hired me based upon the exercise of my (constitutionally) protected freedom of speech to say and write my prior job experience.
Would I be “practicing engineering” by saying and writing that software companies hire me as a “software engineer” without some legalized license to practice? and without being “designated” as an “engineer”?
How is it that the word “engineer” has been “legalized”/ “legally defined” (which is merely a LEGAL FICTION) such that the statutory codes precludes the right to freedom of speech?
LEGAL FICTION – An assumption that something occurred or someone or something exists which, in FACT, is not the case, but that is made in the law [merely legalisms of fiction] to enable a court [-room, administrative court, debt collectors] to equitably [by debt!] resolve [because it was already solved] a matter before it. [the matter existed before the debt, making the matter superior to the debt; but in the LEGAL SYSTEM debt is sovereign by definition!]
BTW: Sovereign is legally defined as: 2. In the United States the sovereignty resides in the body of the people. Vide Rutherf. Inst.282. The “BODY of the PEOPLE” are all ARTIFICIAL PERSON corporations OWNED by the STATE (CORPORATIONS). The Artificial PERSONS corporations [legal presences that “represent” us in the system] are insurance franchises backed by DEBT. Birth Certificates make up the TRUST that contain the debt. The California Vital Records BANK NOTE SPECIALIST has said by phone, “it [the birth certificate] wouldn’t be a BANK NOTE without the BAR CODE!” So the “BODY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES INCORPORATED” are literally DEBT accounting line items as negotiable instruments via Birth Certificates. The human body is SURETY for the debt in violation of U.C.C. Article 3-402 (b) (1): “If the form of the signature shows unambiguously that the signature is made on behalf of the represented person who is identified in the instrument, the representative is not liable on the instrument.” The “represented person”- Person being the key word for the artificial “person” corporation insurance franchise.
Attorneys also go after people for “Unlicensed Practice of Copyrighted LEGAL CODE [they call ‘LAW’]”. After the Article here, there is an Analysis of the Legal definitions and CODES in Oregon that dives into what makes using the word “engineer” illegal in Oregon.
Illegal Math? Oregon State Board criminalizing speech about traffic lights and unlicensed “practice of engineering”
Running red lights can get you a ticket. But in Oregon, you can be fined just for talking about it.
Mats Järlström learned this first-hand last year when the state of Oregon fined him $500 for publicly suggesting that yellow lights should last for slightly longer to accommodate cars making right turns.
Mats is a tinkerer. In the great tradition of American inventors and scientists who got their start working in their garage or basement, Mats saw a problem and set out to fix it—that is, until the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying (EDITORS NOTE: we encourage you to call them on 503-362-2666) brought everything to a screeching halt.
It all started when Mats’s wife received a red-light camera ticket, which sparked Mats’s interest in how exactly yellow lights are timed.
He did a little Googling and found the formula used to set traffic-light times. The length of time a traffic light stays yellow is based on a relatively straightforward mathematical formula, originally drafted in 1959. Mats realized that the formula is incomplete, because it fails to capture the behavior of drivers making right turns. After developing a modified formula and even corresponding with one of the formula’s original creators, Mats started to reach out to others in the scientific community, government officials, and the media.
Mats’s work was generally met with interest and praise, but when Mats e-mailed the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying, things took an abrupt illegal U-turn. The Board told Mats they had no interest in hearing about his ideas. Fair enough. But the Board didn’t stop there. They launched a full-blown investigation, alleging that he’d engaged in the unlicensed “practice of engineering.”
After a two-year-long investigation, the Board fined him $500. According to the Board, “critiquing” the length of yellow lights and talking about his ideas with “members of the public” made Mats a lawbreaker because he’s not an Oregon-licensed professional engineer.
The Board also told Mats that he couldn’t refer to himself using the word “engineer” either. Most people would probably agree that “engineer” is a sensible way to describe Mats, given his education, experience, and skills. (He has a degree in electrical engineering from Sweden, and he’s worked in a range of technical fields for decades). But in Oregon, none of that matters; the word “engineer” is off-limits to everyone who is not a state-licensed professional engineer.
But now, Mats is fighting back. No matter how technical the topic, the government cannot give state-licensed experts a monopoly on exchanging ideas. Mats isn’t claiming the right to single-handedly change traffic lights himself; he just wants to talk about them.
The government has also stopped people like Mats from truthfully calling themselves “engineers.” Just as the State of Oregon has no monopoly on engineering concepts, it has no monopoly on words (EDITORS NOTE: IN SOME SENSE IT DOES! B.A.R. ATTORNEYS WORLD-WIDE HAVE GIVEN THEMSELVES PERMISSION TO MONOPOLIZE WORDS WITH ALL UPPER CASE DOG LATIN-The Justinian Deception and semantic deception/word magic of “LEGAL DICTIONARIES”; WHICH IS USED IN ALL COURT CASE DEBT “MATTERS” across nearly the whole planet -within the corporations pretending to be “governments”- and relates to using UPPER CASE ARTIFICIAL PERSON CORPORATION “NAMES”, particularly on TOMB STONES GRAVE SITES –as death is merely a legal fiction!). That is why Mats has teamed up with the Institute for Justice to ask the federal courts to protect the First Amendment rights of all Oregonians to speak freely about whatever they want. It’s time for Oregon to give free speech the green light.
STATE OF OREGON – OREGON REVISED STATUTES – GSCW Analysis
In the Oregon Legislature – glossary of LEGAL TERMS,
First, click the link on person. There is no definition related to human being ANYWHERE in the glossary definition for “PERSON”. The closest thing there could be is an “INDIVIDUAL”; which is another name for TAXPAYER and thus Artificial person -by code definition in this link-. When
The closest definition for INDIVIDUAL in Oregon Revised Statutes related to human being is as a NATURAL PERSON, but this then relies on the recursive definition of PERSON… which is a logical fallacy. A term cannot define itself; even externalized one and/or more layers through COMPOUND DEFINITIONS -another semantic deception of the legal system-.
- “Individual” means a natural person. “Individual” includes the estate of an incompetent individual or a deceased individual.”
“INCLUDES” means — A term of limitation! — Ex parte Martinez.
“It is a miserable slavery where the law is vague or uncertain.”
Misera est servitus, ubi jus est vagum aut incertum. – Maxim of law
This means that: In referring to an “INDIVIDUAL” as a NATURAL PERSON, what they mean is the GUARDIAN of an Incompetent Individual (the legal presence artificial person, that one has not yet become executor of); who is also an incompetent “individual.”
By referring to human beings as “INDIVIDUALS” -by semantic deception-, Oregon is making “citizens” legally of unsound mind and incompetent!
From the OREGON Glossary Term “DIRECTOR”
(1) The Director of Transportation, with the approval of the Oregon Transportation Commission, shall appoint a chief engineer. The chief engineer shall be a registered civil engineer and shall be qualified by technical training as well as by practical experience.
(2)The chief engineer may designate persons within the Department of Transportation who have full authority to perform any duty required or permitted by law to be performed by the engineer.
(3)The director may authorize the employment by the chief engineer of such staff engineers, engineering and technical assistants and such other help that in the chief engineer’s judgment may be necessary. Compensation, travel allowance and other expenses shall be fixed by the chief engineer with the approval of the director.
Only the Director of Transportation is allowed to APPOINT registered artificial persons as “chief engineers.” Then only the “chief engineer” may “designate” “engineer” artificial persons. The “engineer” entity then only has “registered” debt-insurance to commit “fraudulent and deceptive commerce.” The “engineers” are authorized, meaning they can issued JUDGEMENT ORDERS to CREATE DEBT FROM NOTHING on behalf of the “chief engineer.”
The CHIEF ENGINEER is allowed to FIX THE BOOKS. That is to say: FIX is another word for MANIPULATE, RIG, CONSPIRACY.
A JUDGEMENT ORDER is a very specific type of NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT DEBT that allows them to just simply CREATE it from nothing and count it as REVENUE! They even refer to creating judgements and orders by authorization right there in the Oregon Revised Statutes.
This appears to be extortion by the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying. They have no right nor claim -even as the code is written- to usurp the word “engineer” in such ways. Feel free to contact and/or call them on 503-362-2666 and give them a piece of our mind. If you record the conversation, please say so in the beginning, and send me the audio. My contact info is in the About Page.
This is an offense to all engineers planet wide, particularly those in Oregon who now cannot use the term on their resumés until the legal system changes.
These underlings in the Governmental Corporation likely do not know what their ATTORNEYS are doing with their corporation and codes.
One of the most amazing aspects here is that criminalizing basic human “words”, “actions”, and rights is/was done in many other codes and states/statutes as well, such as “Midwifes”, “massage”, “driving”, “dentist”, “doctor”, “teacher”, “sheriff”, “attorney”, etc. It is almost shocking that the STATE OF OREGON doesn’t start suing/issuing judgement citations to people for using the word “DIRECTOR”!!!! ROFL! The Word “Director” is just as “monopolized” as the word “engineer” here.
So why is/was Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying issuing warrants against the OREGON TREASURY for the word “engineer” rather than word “director”? It seems that the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying is trying to PUNISH people who do their jobs better than them! ROFL! #sad-and-true.
Attorneys try to say that “unlicensed practice of legal statutes is illegal” which may be true because only attorneys have access to the COPYRIGHTED STATUTES and their “execution”, however it is NOT UNLAWFUL. ATTORNEYS -in FACT- do not have any legislative standing in courts. ATTORNEYS ARE PRACTICING CRIMINAL ACTS and allowed to get away with it by having FRAUDULENT DEBT INSURANCE.
I have attempted to gain remedy through these DEBT INSURANCE instruments and even with legitimate claims and PROVEN EVIDENCE, all claims are denied…
Insurance is merely an act to rationalize The State’s criminal behavior.
This -AGAIN- goes to show that the criminal UNITED STATES, INC needs to be treated as the FORECLOSED BANKRUPT TERMINATED corporation that they no longer can fraudulently present themselves as. The APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE is totally done. the UNITED STATES, INC is not about justice, it is about DEBT and not being liable for their own crimes.
Lastly, Oregon and the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying is foreclose by U.C.C. File Documents #2012127810, 2012127854, 2012127907 and 2012127914, unrebutted. They do not have any copyright on the terms “chief engineer” nor “engineer” any more. Such is the nature of foreclosure.
OPEN LETTER to the
Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying
By Signing Below I certify:
– I am competent and authorized to be making these statements.
– I am competent to handle my affairs. (AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH)
– I am no citizen, national and resident but a registered and declared World Citizen of the World Government of World Citizens.
– Any court matter must be settled in an International Court of and at The Common Law and only The Common Law with a jury of private non-lienable human being peers (each knowingly, willfully, and intentionally without legal presence as we both only have in common).
– I am no person (e.g. statutory person, trust, corporation, public office, etc) but a private non-lienable natural human being dweller at The Natural Law since birth.
Sincerely, In Lak’ech ala K’in,
Without Prejudice, All Rights Reserved, AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
By: /s/———————————-©/, in propria persona, World Citizen 2017.04.26
——————————©, in propria persona, World Citizen, living private non-lienable natural sentient being dweller Date
Common Law Justice for Peace
Deputy Clerk for World Citizens
Private Attorney General
Besides making our voices heard, what else can be done about the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying? Rather than sue the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying GENERAL COUNSEL BAR ATTORNEYS -whom are LITERALLY in cahoots with the BAR ATTORNEY JUDGES and DEFENSE ATTORNEYS (as all BAR ATTORNEYS WORK FOR THE COURT FIRST AND FOREMOST; before the client)-…
How about this as a solution to the clear and obvious corporate criminal behavior by public officials in the UNITED STATES, INC?