Federal Reserve and Judge Cites Bad Sources in Supporting “Lawful Money” as “Legalized Tender”

The Federal Reserve System website refers to the 1933 Emergency Bankruptcy as to the remedy to confiscation of Gold by making Federal Reserve Notes into “Legal Tender.”  The nature of such a profound legal change -that of outlawing lawful money for the paper ponzi banker debt notes- is such that judges actually had to entirely establish a NEW body of law called Statutory Law in 1933 based on Uniform Commercial Code.

Statutory Law of 1933 is/was the administration of the bankruptcy of the United States Inc from 1933 which made “Fed Notes” into “legal tender.”  The administration of the bankruptcy only needed to be established, which was had in 1938, and thus imposed across the US.

The Federal Reserve website lastly refers to the Milam v. U.S., 524 F.2d 629 (9th Cir. 1974) -which references the Legal Tender Cases (Juilliard v. Greenman), 110 U.S. 421 (1884)– as to why Fed Note Debts are more than “legal tender” but are “lawful money.”  The flaw here is that the courtrooms of 1974 all knew they couldn’t and shouldn’t reference anything prior to the implementation of Statutory Bankruptcy Law in 1933.  The ruling from Erie R.R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938) established Uniform Commercial Code (slavery via bankruptcy) across the UNITED STATES.

In 1974, the BAR Attorney Administrative “Judges” were really the only people trained in executing the administration of bankruptcy across America.  They thought they could get away with referencing the NON-STATUTORY LEGALISMS into the corporate statutory legal fictional STATUTORY space.

The only reason this is important today is/was that the Federal Reserve banked on the legal system fraudulently defining “Federal Reserve Notes” of debt as “LEGAL TENDER” and then “LAWFUL MONEY.”

One of the massive legalese semantic deceptions by Crown Temple BAR Attorneys is/was that they provide the legal definition of “LAWFUL MONEY.”  The Legal system is/was through-the-looking-glass.

Black’s Law Dictionary for Money:

A general, indefinite term for the measure and representative of value; currency; the circulating medium ; cash. “Money” is a generic term, and embraces every description of coin or bank-notes recognized by common consent as a representative of value in effecting exchanges of property or payment of debts. Hopson v. Fountain. 5 Humph. (Tenn.) 140. Money is used in a specific and also in a general and more comprehensive sense. In its specific sense, it means what is coined or stamped by public authority, and has its determinate value fixed by governments. In its more comprehensive and general sense, it means wealth.

The legal definition of LAWFUL MONEY has nothing to do with gold or silver.  That’s why they have created and used such definitions.  It is a Justinian Deception of DOG LATIN to use such UPPER CASE WORDS FOR LEGAL MEANS.

Here is the Text from the Federal Reserve Website, for history:

What is lawful money? How is it different from legal tender?

“Lawful money” is a term used in the Federal Reserve Act, the act that authorizes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to issue Federal Reserve notes. The Act states that Federal Reserve notes “shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank.” The Act did not, however, define the term “lawful money,” but up until 1913, the only currency issued by the United States that was legally recognized as “lawful money” was various issues of “demand notes” (subsequently known as “old demand notes”) and “United States notes” authorized by Congress during the Civil War.

At the time, some currency was not considered legal tender, although it could be used by national banking associations as “lawful money reserves.” Thus, the term “lawful money” had a broader meaning than the term “legal tender.” 

In 1933, Congress changed the law so that all U.S. coins and currency (including Federal Reserve notes), regardless of when issued, constitutes “legal tender” for all purposes. Federal and state courts since then have repeatedly held that Federal Reserve notes are also “lawful money.” Milam v. U.S., 524 F.2d 629 (9th Cir. 1974), is typical of the federal and state court cases holding that Federal Reserve notes are “lawful money.” In Milam, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reviewed a judgment denying relief to an individual who sought to redeem a $50 Federal Reserve Bank Note in “lawful money.” The United States tendered Milam $50 in Federal Reserve notes, but Milam refused the notes, asserting that “lawful money” must be gold or silver. The Ninth Circuit, noting that this matter had been put to rest by the U.S. Supreme Court nearly a century before in the Legal Tender Cases (Juilliard v. Greenman), 110 U.S. 421 (1884), rejected this assertion as frivolous and affirmed the judgment.

The only assertion that is frivolous is the usage of a PRE-STATUTORY Court Case from 1884 to assume into POST-STATUTORY Legal Precedence that “legal tender” is/was somehow “lawful money.”

Tip of the Iceberg

There are so many hypocritical aspects to BAR Attorneys it’s traitorous.

The only reason why Debt is Considered “legal tender” is because it is copyrighted speech of the bankers.  Humans are/were using banker’s debt-speech for everything.  The bankers obviously get to dictate what speech it is, the rules, the qualifications, the energy vampiristic sigils and magic on the notes, etc.

The idea of Debt as Speech has been around for Millenia.  Jesus through the Money Changers away…  and 3 days later he was persecuted.

Debt is a corporate speech right.  Federal Reserve Notes were the speech of the UNITED STATES, INC and what makes it “sovereign”; in a dualistic non-sovereign way.

A debt by the government that is held in bonds of foreign denominations.

United States Treasury Bills/Bonds are denominated in FOREIGN LEGAL TENDER called FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

The concept that encodes Corporations as “persons” is/was one of the main roots that enabled such corporate slavery to take place.  Our “legal presences” are like corporate overlays where the governmental corporations are “doing business” with that layer.  The dishonest part is/was that the Governmental Service Corporations and their BAR Attorneys refused to disclose the full terms and conditions of the obligations.

The obligations from the STATE Corporation are the Birth Certificate; then the SSN, Driver’s License, Selective Service, Passport, Marriage Certificate, etc, etc.  It cannot be overstated that these obligations are NOT CONTRACTS.  A Contract requires the AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE OF BOTH PARTIES; and without changing the interim terms and conditions after one party has signed.  The way banks did that was by stamping Promissory Notes and Mortgages with their Seals to “turn them into debt.”

In this way, are then obligated to produce something for the state of equal energy value…  given the non-disclosure of terms and conditions, is an unconscionable trade/contract.

The Corporations have enabled themselves to resell the same Piece of Debt multiple times.  It’s called Re-Hypothecation.  The City of London Corporation, run by and organized for the Crown Temple BAR, allows for INFINITE RE-HYPOTHECATION.  Indeed,  Many U.S. Banks and the government underwrite the same mortgage 10-30 times over.  Each party gets “their copy” of the debt as accounting line items.  Debts are magically duplicated.

Debt is worthless because there is so much of it.  Literally.  There are records at the Council on Foreign Relations indicating the existence of 2.688 Septendecillion Dollars in just one of the accounts in the Federal Reserve.

So, the Federal Reserve has been up craps creek since August 1971 when the Nixon Gold Shock happened.   The Nixon Gold Shock was just the preliminary act. The entire Federal Reserve system almost came to a complete halt in 1971 had it not been for Nixon’s actions, at which time the Bretton Woods Global Monetary Agreements were dismantled.  The bankers had issued too much debt.  So obviously the next step was to make that too take all that debt and underwrite it…   again.   Yay for re-hypothecation!

The Authority for the Federal Reserve is/was faulty being based on non-statutory rulings being legalized by corrupt judges.


If you haven’t started getting into Digital Currencies -like bitcoin and ethereum- you probably should check it out.   You can start mining for digital currencies right on your home computer(s).  At the rate these Digital Currencies are growing, they could actually be viable alternatives to Federal Reserve Notes globally!

One of the easiest methods of personally getting into mining digital currencies is with MinerGate.   They have a Smart Profit Switching Mining App with Windows, Mac, and Ubuntu support.

Start Mining Now before more people get in.

https://minergate.com/

 

The process to mining and earning your own bitcoins and alt coins:

  1. Click the link
  2. create an account (email, password, not much more)
  3. download the app for your computer
  4. Login to the app
  5. Start the Smart

Miner with about 75% of the CPU processor cores. and just let it mint the most profitable seigniorage for you.

Use the digital currency, trade them on exchanges, and even convert them back to Federal Reserve Notes!

Advertisements

One thought on “Federal Reserve and Judge Cites Bad Sources in Supporting “Lawful Money” as “Legalized Tender””

Post a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s