Overstanding Birth Certificates– Birth Certificates create Corporate Property; How to claim a Birth Certificate

One of the easiest ways for us each to claim ownership over the Birth Certificate Corporation is putting a Certificate Of Authentications (powerful Apostilles) on our own Birth Certificate.

Then, by signing a Power of Attorney (“POA”) over the Birth Certificate, we become the Attorney-In-Fact for the legal presence corporation.   Each state has a standard POA form.  The “Legal presence” Principal should give-up  as many powers as possible to the Agent.  The Agent (you) are a “non-person” of non-“limited sovereignty” in a self-governing body, such as the World Government of World Citizens.

Birth Certificates are NOT trusts/estates, but held in trust/estate due to us not claiming it.  It’s the same as if we get a coat checked and get a receipt in return; but then never return to pick it up.  Under their rules, they can use the coat we left there in any way they want.  We must pick it up.

The UN-United States are custodians of alien property and American Nationals are Alien Property -in UN-US trust- for being OUTSIDE of the City of Washington.

Confusing ourselves as “US Citizens” makes our body into “surety” for the artificial “person” legal presence.   The “US Citizen” provides an authorized signature and all rights are revoked by “en/titling” by the UN/US under perpetuation of slavery, Civil War, and World War 2.   American Nationals and US Citizens are different entities, yet both are under the corporate slavery statutory codes.

The US President, US Secretary of Treasury, and US Attorney General must be notified to terminate their presumption of trust.

Here are a few elements that can be done to leave the system:

These are all easy steps to follow.  Knowing what these forms are, do, and why must be overstood.  The steps to perform depend upon the objectives we have.  The link between our objectives and the forms depends upon our overstanding of these concepts.

Ultimately, a Legal Presence was a Franchise Corporation that represented us.  If we confuse ourselves with this corporation -in our likeness- they they feel they deserve to treat us as confused, legally incompetent, and infants lost at sea.  Their language is even couched in such concepts.  To bring someone to court, they believe our spirit must be SUMMONED from the dead.  The Vatican has placed the whole Earth Hologram into death through the 4 Papel Bulls and 3 Crowns: Unam Sanctum, Romanus Pontifex, Convocation, and Aeteri Regis.

If we are going to keep these “legal presences” around, taking possession of the corporation is a must.  This is even more important than getting an SSN and/or a Driver’s License.  It is our legal competency.

Filing a Power of Attorney over the Legal presence, and then getting a Certificate of Authentication on both the POA and Birth Certificate from the State, Nation, and UN would be necessary.  Some say that the UN level isn’t required.  It could receive Certificate of Authentications from the City of London, and Vatican City.

With these documents and Our own Identifying ID, we file it with the county we were born in (that created the Legal Presence Birth Certificate) to claim the “orphaned child.”  Get a CERTIFIED COPY of the filed instrument.  Filing a Copy of the Certified Copy with any Courtroom will disprove and undo their “Magical SENTENCES.”  Magi-strates conduct straight magic.

There are two forms of identification that could be used for the Power of Attorney:  Lawful “common Law” Id which requires 2/3 witnesses with/without notary and/or a “recognized” self governing body.  “Recognized” being a relative term of course.  The World Government of World Citizens has been around for many decades, has over a million citizens, and is a self-governing body for non-persons outside the United Nations.  It has official lawful recognition under the UNITED STATES as a non-legal entity that cannot be officially legally recognized.

It is following throw with any of these measures that makes a holographic difference not just in your own life but in the lives of everyone around you, the whole planet, and our space brothers and sisters.

With the POA, it is possible to travel without a license.  The ATTORNEY-IN-FACT cannot be held accountable for the “driver” and is merely acting for any “driver legal presence”.  However, the State is likely to not issue a Driver’s license to the Attorney-In-Fact because the “PERSON” never showed up.  So the Attorney-In-Fact cannot be confused with a legal presence given the Power of Attorney Documentation.  This said, Police are NOT lawful and abuse their powers.  Providing a POA to Police should work, but very likely won’t stop the ignorant Corporate Policy Enforces from committing their abuses under their false presumptions and color of law, and possibly then trying to cover it up -like many instances I have heard-.

In dealing with the Policy Enforcers and local County legal presence Attorn/eys, Going over their heads is usually most effective.  Dealing with local “courtroom debt cases” at their own level could work.  Calling the US Department of State Office of Legal Affairs about a county attorney unlawfully removing World Citizen nationality has a whole different effect on situations.

Essentially, without filing to take back the American Nationality from the US President, US Secretary of Treasury, and US Attorney General, then these three people have legally claimed ownership over then American National via UN Trusteeship over stateless persons.  This is why claiming to be an American National enables further abuse by these legalized criminal corporations.

Claiming Citizenship with a foreign Self-Governing Body unrelated to the legal fictional history could be critical in proving “non-person”-hood without the United Nations.

P.S. By mining Digital Currencies, we become our own central bank.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Overstanding Birth Certificates– Birth Certificates create Corporate Property; How to claim a Birth Certificate”

  1. Renouncing citizenship seems a bit extreme, becoming a “man (or woman) without a country,” or its protections. How do you establish residency afterwards? Now you are as free as a squirrel on a tree, and as vulnerable. Also not feeling warm & fuzzy with the UN. An earlier post about the OPPT says much of this procedure described above is rendered obsolete and unnecessary now. How would you have access to the trust funds US government has been holding for you if you renounce that relationship? Some people are self-informed of natural status correction before others.

    https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2017/07/13/pay-all-bills-now-with-your-no-longer-secret-social-security-trust-account/

    https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2017/07/10/divine-sovereignty-utilizing-your-treasury-direct-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-24230

    Like

    1. The Term “RESIDENCY” is a legal term of deception and adhesion into their maritime jurisdiction. The Legal presence still resides. We become the “AGENT” Attorney-In-Fact over the legal presence Principal. As the AGENT, having expatriation papers to show that we can’t be assumed as “US Citizens” helps.

      What is called dwelling on the land is often confused as re/sidency from the sea. It is similar to presence vs re/presented-representation. The World Citizen Oath and Attestation is for us to be PRESENT in THIS MOMENT OF NOW, never RE-PRESENT/ed nor RE-Present-able. Denial of nationality is a violation of basic UN human rights, of a self-governing body outside the UN of a being of non-“limited sovereignty”; meaning “unenumerated rights.”

      Expatriating is not extreme when considering that the UN was perpetuating World War 2 and the US was perpetuating the civil war. Becoming a World Citizen is gaining lawful identity within the Agent Status. American Nationals are technically still under trusteeship as people on the land without governments, stateless. Thus, even if we partition ourselves outside their system, the non-“limited sovereignty” status apparently isn’t enough… it must be organized… which naturally expatriates the human being from the UN system of bankruptcy debt slavery.

      Relinquishing and renouncing are different processes. Relinquishing is for Human Beings, Renouncing is for Legal Presences. I recommend becoming a member/citizen of a juristic society to gain “self-governing” status without the UN. The World Government of World Citizens is global and been around for quite a while. It is designed exactly for this purpose.

      Being free could mean many things:
      1) not being associated with the UN Legal presence -which has been extremely difficult to do because of they power of assumption that the UN has over all UN legal presences, and the authority they give their UN Member Nations.
      2) Take possession of the Legal presence to use it and shut it down.
      3) expatriation via relinquishment and/or renouncing
      ….
      666) confuse oneself with the artificial person and believe they are free despite being a debt slave to the UN-IMF.
      Did you know that the UN phone number is 212-963-1234 which when the middle numbers are equalized comes out to NEW YORK 666 access the devil as Easy as 1234. I have called them several times to find out wtf is going on.

      It is up to the goals and beliefs that one acts on these various things. I have done these things and many many many more processes. I expressed my freedom of speech and found the governmental services corporations to be severely lacking. The Scope of the “legal presence problem” is vast. All universities issued “birth certificate like” negotiable instruments for each of their students and underwrote them. All Colleges and Universities are PRE-PAID! The Student ID Number comes directly from the BOND INSTRUMENT that represents them and their DEGREE. All Degrees are literally Pre-paid Debts.

      It is true that these processes are moot. Let me put it like this, these processes SHOULD be moot. I celebrate the day they are. I hope to god they are moot yesterday. I share them should they be useful to anyone in making the leap to their mootness.

      Like

    2. got mine done
      After 1723, Manumission Takes Careful Planning and Plenty of Savvy
      As the institution of slavery matured in colonial Virginia, slaveholders saw the small number of free blacks in the colony as a “great inconvenience” suspected of everything from receiving stolen goods and encouraging slaves to run away to fomenting rebellion. Moreover, “being grown old [they bring] a charge upon the country”—that is, aged free blacks who were unable to work, in principle at least, became eligible for support from the parishes in which they lived. Although the General Assembly never considered reenslavement of the existing free black population, it took measures to prevent slaveholders of “ill directed” generosity from adding to the numbers by setting slaves free.
      In 1691, the General Assembly passed a law aimed at making masters think twice before freeing any of their slaves. While manumission by deed or will was legal under this law, it required a newly freed slave to leave the colony within six months and the former master to pay for the trip. Although legislation likely had a dampening effect on the urge to manumit, it is not clear how many slaves were freed and forced to leave Virginia during the thirty-two years it was in effect.
      Manumission became much more difficult in 1723. Paragraph 17 of the 1723 Act Directing the Trial of Slaves, Committing Capital Crimes; and for the More Effectual Punishing Conspiracies and Insurrection of Them; and for the Better Government of Negros, Mulattos, and Indians, Bond or Free stated that “No negro, mullatto, or Indian slaves, shall be set free, upon any pretence whatsoever, except for some meritorious services, to be adjudged and allowed by the governor and council, for the time being.”
      Passed in response to rumored slave insurrections, this act permitted manumission only upon approval of the governor and Council and then only as a reward for public service. Should a slave be set free in any other manner (by will or deed, for example), the act required churchwardens to return the person so freed to slavery by sale at public outcry.
      Historians have said that the “meritorious service” in which Virginians were most interested was for slaves to alert authorities to slave conspiracies and insurrections, but records of the governor’s Council show that no slaves gained their freedom on those grounds after 1723. Instead, meritorious service came to include such qualities as exemplary character and faithfulness. In spite of the 1723 law, a few slave owners left instructions in their wills to free a slave. It was then up their executors or administrators to petition the governor and Council.
      When arrangements prior to petitioning the governor and Council included agreement between a white slaveholder and a slave or free black, the process was fraught with pitfalls. A slave owner might die before a slave or free black was able to fulfill the purchase agreement. It is also not hard to imagine that, after receiving the agreed upon purchase price for a slave, a master might not honor the agreement, perhaps by simply failing to go to the trouble and expense of taking that extra but critical step of submitting a petition to the Council. The following examples and the chart below may help explain why there are only about twenty petitions for freedom to be found among the journals of the Council between 1723 and 1773.

      White or free black slave owner wishes to manumit his/her slave
      Free black person seeks freedom for enslaved spouse/child owned by someone else
      Enslaved person seeks to free self legally
      Slave performs “meritorious service” to public
       


       
       
       
       
      Makes purchase agreement with owner of spouse/child
       
       
      Makes purchase agreement with his/her owner with understanding that freedom is ultimate goal

       
      Meritorious service comes to attention of governor and Council


       

       
       
      Completes purchase; spouse/child now owned by free spouse/parent
      Slave completes purchase by legally remains the slave of his/her master

       

       

       
      Master petitions governor and Council for slave’s freedom; offers evidence of meritorious service
      Master petitions governor and Council for slave’s freedom; offers evidence of meritorious service
      Master petitions governor and Council for slave’s freedom; offers evidence of meritorious service
      Governor and Council consider rewarding the slave by granting his/her freedom


       


      Governor and Council allow or disallow petitions; if allowed, freedom conferred

      From the Executive Journals
      of the Council
      April 29, 1729
      Whereas upon consideration of the many extraordinary Cures perform’d by Papaw a Negro Slave belonging to M[istress] Frances Littlepage of the County of New Kent, it was resolved that means should be used to obtain from him a discovery of the secret whereby he performs the said cures; and the said Papaw having upon promise of his freedom now made an ample discovery of the several medicines made use of by him for that purpose to the satisfaction of the Governor and the Gentlemen appointed by him to inspect the application and operation of the said medicines, It is the opinion of this board and accordingly ordered that as a reward for useful a discovery, which may be of great benefit to mankind, and more particularly to the preservation of the lives of great numbers of Slaves belonging to the Inhabitants of this Country frequently infected with the Yaws, and other venereal distempers, the said Papaw be set free; and that the sum of £50 current money be paid to the said M[istress} Frances Littlepage out of his Majesty’s Revenue of 2 shillings per hogshead, for his freedom; but that he remain still under the direction of the Government until he made a discovery of some other secrets he has for expelling poison, and the cure of other diseases.
       
      Council Journal, December 11, 1745
      On Petition of Abram Newton a Mulatto setting forth that he being Husband of Elizabeth Young a free Mulatto was purchased by her and lived with her til her Death and that the said Elizabeth by a writing under her Hand gave the Petitioner his Discharge after her Death and Praying the Board to grant or confirm to him his freedom Ordered That the party who claims a Property in him be summoned to appear and shew Cause there upon why his prayer shall not be granted.
       
      Council Journal, June 13, 1746
      Ordered that the said Abram be manumitted and set free according to the Will of the said Elizabeth and the Prayer of the Petitioner.
       
      Council Journal, November 27, 1769
      On the Petition of Matthew Ashby, a free Mulatto setting forth that he had two Children by his present Wife Ann Ashby, while she was a Slave to Samuel Spurr, that he bought her and the two Children of the said Spurr for one hundred and fifty pounds, that he has now two Children alive by her John and Mary, that she has been a faithful and diligent Wife ever since marriage, and praying that he may be permitted to set her and his Children free; the board being satisfied therein, were of opinion, that the said Ann, John and Mary were deserving of the freedom, and it was order’d that the said Matthew Ashby have leave to Manumit and set them free:
       
      Council Journal, March 21, 1772
      The Petition of Margaret, late a slave of Dorothy Cartmill, of the County of Frederick, deceased, was presented and read; setting forth that her said Mistress in her late Sickness made her last will and Testament by which she gave the Petitioner to her son Edward Cartmill for five Years, and then she directed that the Petitioner should have her Freedom, as a reward for the extraordinary Diligence and Tenderness with which she waited on her during a long and painful Illness; and praying that his Excellency and their Honours would be pleased to give their Consent that the said Dorothy’s Intentions in her Favour may receive a full Sanction.
      On consideration whereof, it was the opinion of the Board and ordered accordingly that the said Edward Cartmill, or any other Person who would be intitled to the Service of the said Slave, if the said Will had never been made, be permitted to Manumit and set Free the aforesaid Margaret.
       
      Council Journal, October 30, 1772
      John Carter, Esqr. Having petitioned the Governor and Council, for leave to manumit his Slave, named Agathy, together with her five Children, called Betty, Myrtilla, Lucy, Aggy, and James, & having failed to give the board Satisfactory Proof of their meritorious Services, as the law requires, the petition was rejected.
       
      Council Journal, May 7, 1773
      The Petition of Elizabeth Jolliffe, Executrix of William Jolliffe decd. For Leave to manumit Jane, a Negro girl according to her Husband’s will, was rejected for want of proof of meritorious Service as the Law requires.
       
      Virginia Gazette (Purdie), June 16, 1775
      TEN POUNDS REWARD. RUN away from the subscriber in Dunmore county, in May last, a negro fellow named SAM, 5 feet 5 or 6 inches high, has a broad face, and is a well looking fellow. As to his clothing, I cannot be certain, he having carried several things with him. He also took with him an old bay horse very gray about the head, an iron pot, a narrow axe, a handsaw, and an old smooth bore gun. About three years ago he purchased his freedom of his old master, Mr. Francis Slaughter, and continued in that state till this spring, when it was discovered he was attempting to inveigle away a number of negroes to the new or Indian country (where he had been most of the last summer) upon which the neighbours insisted on his being reduced to slavery again, and I purchased him. I imagine he will endeavour to pass as a freeman, he having a discharge from his old master, as well as one from Lord Dunmore, having served in the expedition against the Indians last fall. Whoever delivers said slave to me shall have the reward that is offered.
      GABRIEL JONES
      Sam had the proper papers from both his former owner and the governor, but his reenslavement illustrates the threat posed by his suspicious “neighbours.”
      Click here to see the entire glossary of terms relating to slaves and free blacks. 

      This article was written by Linda Rowe, historian in the Department of Historical Research, Colonial Williamsburg. The article first appeared in the Summer 2004 issue of the Colonial Williamsburg Interpreter.

      This is remedy that william culver;>TODD has found
      Nowadays its done by consent and the assumend is remedy we can freely file the assumed name at COUNTY ADUDITOR and SEC. OF STATE apostille when we get abused by the belligerent OFFICERS.

      When your in the military you can earn it this way
      The Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) is a military award presented to members of the United States Armed Forces who distinguished themselves by outstanding meritorious achievement or service to the United States subsequent to January 16, 1969.

      Like

      1. assumed name in Washington its session law 145 house bill 64 of 1907 every state and country have one . and you become grantor grantee returnee all at once

        Like

Post a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s