June 20th, 2017– Gregorian Date
(WASHINGTON, DC) Senator Chuck Grassley introduced Bill S.1241 — 115th Congress (2017-2018) -a Bill titled Combating Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, and Counterfeiting Act of 2017– last May 25th, 2017. The Money Laundering Act makes it illegal to have and transact in cash and digital currencies/cryptocurriencies without registering the amounts and trades with a local bank.
The Money Laundering Act conceptually declares digital crytpo-currency mining, usage, and holding an act of money laundering and counterfeiting, particularly in regards to Federal Reserve Notes maintaining their fictitious Valueless Perception of Worth. Requiring the registration of all digital currency holdings and transactions in the U.S. is an attempt to brazenly legalize (fictionalize) the all digital currency networks under the “legal jurisdiction” of a criminal government. After the United States succeeds, all UN Member Nations interested in continued debt slavery could act to implement such measures, in kind. It is a power grab of the Commons by the United States Corporation over a Constitutionally First Amendment Protected Freedom of Speech Medium (digital currencies) and non-legal trade that governmental corporations cannot control nor profit from (with debt mechanisms).
The “Terrorist Financing” label being used by US Senators was to undermine all legitimate commentary on the topic. Indeed, the Act itself is an act of terrorism upon the Digital Commons and Digital Rights. It is a usurpation of value, rights, and property. The Act violates legal precedence in converting a basic digital right into a “license”, regardless of fees, to outright ban digital currencies. The Money Laundering Act only points out the laundering of worth via valueless debt by the Federal Reserve and seems to merely be an attempt to protect the unlawful DEBT-AS-MONEY Racketeering of Central Bankers.
Continue reading New U.S. Bill: Register All Cash, Digital Currencies, and Digital Transactions With Local Bank, even Steem, Ethereum
Anna Hunt, Staff Writer Waking Times
The LA Times recently reported that the cost of housing each inmate in the California prison system will cost $75,560 per year. This is 20 percent higher than the cost of attending Harvard College, based on Harvard estimates for room, board and tuition.
Cost of Housing Prisoners Doubled Since 2005
Interestingly, housing prisoners in California is now twice as expensive as it was in 2005. The cost surged in 2015, increasing nearly $10,000 or 13 percent from the prior year. The biggest cost drivers are prison staff salaries. For example, today, the California corrections department employs about one person per two inmates. In 1994, this ratio was one employee to four inmates.
Continue reading Housing Prisoners in California More Expensive than sending them to Harvard
The State of New York has converted Digital Rights –using Bitcoin, “virtual”-digital currencies and Block-chain technology– into a privilege with a License for a Fee. The New York Department of Financial Services called it a BitLicense and is “required” for all businesses transacting Virtual Currencies like a bank.
The goal is to “regulate bitcoin and virtual currencies.” However, there is nothing “legal” about virtual currencies. Digital Currencies are entirely NON-LEGAL and only LAWFUL. The NY-DFS has been sneaky about it too:
A business must obtain a BitLicense if it engages in virtual currency business activity involving New York State or persons that reside, are located, have a place of business, or are conducting business in New York.
Such regulation “shadow bans” all “STATE OF NEW YORK ARTIFICIAL PERSONS/CITIZENS” from various digital currency networks. See The Real Cost of Applying New York BitLicenses.
Frost estimated the [BitLicense] application cost Bitstamp roughly $100,000, including time allocation, legal and compliance fees.
Continue reading State of New York Converts Digital Rights to Use Bitcoin into Privilege with a License for a Fee in Violation of Legal Precedence
* This is not a pro- nor anti-vaccine position. It is a public service message of dangers of certain unnecessary chemicals used in vaccines.
Victims of vaccine damage can sue manufacturers in the US. Major media aren’t giving this story the coverage it deserves. I certainly am.
Short question: Can a person sue a US vaccine manufacturer?
Short answer: Under certain conditions, yes.
Continue reading Adult Victims of Vaccine Damage can Sue Manufacturers in US, INC
Early 2015 I sent out 51 FOIA requests to each State for the underwriter of vital records. What came back is fascinating and -by itself- inconclusive. What does matter is further due diligence/research into the topic. There were 51 FOIA requests sent because New York City has its own BIRTH CERTIFICATE REGISTRATION for “legal presences” because they want to get in on the negotiable instrument sales of human beings into slavery for their own profit. The above specific NON-STATE issuer of BIRTH CERTIFICATE negotiable Instruments can be seen here with DONALD JOHN TRUMP’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
What makes a BIRTH CERTIFICATE a SECURITY is multiple aspects:
Continue reading Results of 50 FOIA Requests to each State for Vital Records “Underwriter”