Washington State Warrant Processing Division Scrubs Website that (Court) Warrants are merely Checks

Many of the blog posts here on Governmental Services Corporation Watch have relied upon the evidence on the State of Washington Corporation – Warrant Processing Division website.  The legal fictional BAR Attorneys seem to have gotten wise to the obviousness of the following text on such a governmental website:

April 11, 2016 Snap shot Click for the full resolution screen shot. And also found here on the Wayback machine.

As it is seen here:

A warrant – or check – is a legal, negotiable instrument drawn against the state treasury in place of a commercial bank.  State agencies disburse funds to vendors or other payees by issuing warrants from the state treasury that bears the State Treasurer’s unique Routing Number and are signed by the State Treasurer.

Because the responsibility for authorizing and producing warrants resides with individual state agencies, inquiries about a payment made by a state agency should be directed to the issuing agency.

But this text has changed:  the “-or check-” is removed.  Their website now puts forth: Continue reading Washington State Warrant Processing Division Scrubs Website that (Court) Warrants are merely Checks

Advertisements

“Driving” Waives Constitutionally Protected Rights Enabling Tax By Mile, restored by exercising Right To Travel

Unable to compel drivers to give blood or breathe into a machine, these states made it a crime for a person to refuse to submit to a police demand to do so.  These states justify their laws based on two legal fictions — that driving is a “privilege, not a right,” and that by driving a car that the driver impliedly consents to have his blood and breath searched.  In effect, these states give a driver the choice to either surrender his rights or go directly to jail.

Based on its “privacy rights” analysis, the Supreme Court of Minnesota came to the bizarre conclusion that the government can do literally anything it wants to a person’s body “incidental” to his being arrested.

North Dakota not only claimed complete sovereignty over the body of an arrested person, but, by doing so, the state denigrated the right of the people to use an automobile to facilitate full participation in the nation’s economy.

Clearly, the commercial activity of “driving” in a “motor carrier vehicle” requires a Driver’s License (DL).  The Driver’s License is its own artificial person corporate franchise insurance product TRADE-NAME©.  The DL itself is its own artificial person -that is NOT us, as human beings-. The DL “represents” us, and -having our signature on it- is the contract that allows the suspension of Constitutional Rights for corporate rights of the artificial person.

Continue reading “Driving” Waives Constitutionally Protected Rights Enabling Tax By Mile, restored by exercising Right To Travel

Michigan Secretary of State refuses to return Manufacturer’s Certificate of Origin

Before there is a STATE issued VEHICLE TITLE, the vehicle is (likely) sitting in a registered dealer’s lot.  While it sits there, the registered dealer has a MANUFACTURER’S CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN.  According to:

The UNITED STATES, INCDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS LICENSE AGENCY

MCOvsMSO

So lets un-confuse things here!

MCOsAreBankNotes

Continue reading Michigan Secretary of State refuses to return Manufacturer’s Certificate of Origin