Brain-damaging vaccines, pesticides, medicines, and Harmful EM Radiation generate nearly $800 billion a year in medical revenues

This applies to fluoride and chlorine in the water, fly ash from geo-engineering (with aluminum, barium, and strontium), GMO foods with pesticides BUILT INTO the DNA of the food-like organisms, and Electromagnetic contamination.  See the second article.

The ADVANCED medical technologies that the Break-away civilization has would heal everyone…  but create exactly ZERO DEBT.  That is the “problem” with medical health…  it is not a model for creation of more debt.

Brain-damaging vaccines, pesticides and medicines generate nearly $800 billion a year in medical revenues

Monday, April 17, 2017 by:

The current estimated annual cost for nine of the most common neurological disorders in the U.S. was a hefty $789 billion, a recent paper revealed. According to the paper, these conditions include Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia, traumatic brain injury and Parkinson’s disease, as well as epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, and spinal cord injury.

Researchers also projected that health care costs associated with brain damage will continue to increase as the number of elderly patients were expected to double between 2011 and 2050. Data showed that medical costs related to dementia and stroke alone were estimated to be more than $600 billion by 2030.

“The findings of this report are a wake-up call for the nation, as we are facing an already incredible financial burden that is going to rapidly worsen in the coming years. Although society continues to reap the benefits of the dramatic research investments in heart disease and cancer over the last few decades, similar levels of investment are required to fund neuroscience research focused on curing devastating neurological diseases such as stroke and Alzheimer’s, both to help our patients and also to avoid costs so large they could destabilize the entire health care system and the national economy,” said lead author Dr. Clifton Gooch, ScienceDaily.com reports.

The findings were published in the Annals of Neurology.

Is drug use a contributing factor to brain damage?

Mounting evidence point to certain medications as risk factors in developing some of the most debilitating neurological conditions in the country. A study published in the JAMA Internal Medicine found a correlation between long-term use of anticholinergic medications like Benadryl and the onset of dementia. Anticholinergic drugs were shown to inhibit the action of acetylcholine, an organic chemical that plays a crucial role in learning and memory.

Researchers at the University of Washington examined nearly 3,500 men and women ages 65 years and older and found those who used anticholinergic drugs had higher odds of developing dementia than those who did not take the drug. Study data also showed that higher dementia risk coincided with cumulative doses of anticholinergic drugs. Researchers said patients who took the drugs for an equivalent of three years or more had a 54% increased odds of developing the mental disorder.

Potentially toxic substances found in vaccines may also play a key role in the development of brain damage. For instance, traces of aluminum in vaccines were linked to the Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological conditions. Aluminum, a toxic metal and a known neurotoxin, is often used as an adjuvant agent vaccines. A 2013 study published in the journal Immunologic Research revealed that adults with high aluminum exposure may were at an increased risk of developing age-related neurological conditions that resemble Alzheimer’s disease.

Another study published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology revealed that higher aluminum accumulation was found in the brain tissue samples of patients with late-onset or sporadic Alzheimer’s disease compared with age-matched controls. “Aluminium is neurotoxic and and the concentrations of aluminium found in these familial [Alzheimer’s disease] brains are unlikely to be benign and indeed are highly likely to have contributed to both the onset and the aggressive nature of any ongoing AD in these individuals. These data lend support to the recent conclusion that brain aluminium will contribute towards all forms of [Alzheimer’s disease] under certain conditions,” said study author Professor Christopher Exley, Vaccines.news reports.

Another toxic compound called glyphosate, a main component of Monsant’s flagship pesticide Roundup, can also be found in vaccines. Screening results from Microbe Inotech Laboratories Inc. in St. Louis, Missouri revealed that certain influenza, DTap, and MMR vaccines contain the hazardous pesticide. Glyphosate was associated with the onset of autism and certain forms of cancer such as multiple myeloma and leukemia.

Sources: 

ScienceDaily.com

Harvard.edu

Vaccines.news

HippocraticPost.com

EcoWatch.com

 

If We Could See All The Electromagnetic Radiation Waves Around Us Would We Still Accept Microwave Technology As Safe?

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Microwaves and their consumer-unrealized effects are so pervasive, currently we live in a “sea of invisible non-ionizing radiation,” which has adverse health implications regardless of what ICNIRP and the microwave tech industries, their lobbyists and trade associations claim in their ‘science’ propaganda.  The chart below ought to indicate just how ubiquitous those invisible ‘ghosts of future health problems’ really are.

Source

Here’s another graphic showing where some of the more common ‘smart’ technologies fit into the spectrum.

Source

Note what the American Cancer Society has to say about non-ionizing radiation:

Radiofrequency (RF) radiation, which includes radio waves and microwaves, is at the low-energy end of the electromagnetic spectrum. It is a type of non-ionizing radiation. Non-ionizing radiation has enough energy to move atoms in a molecule around or cause them to vibrate, but not enough to ionize (remove charged particles such as electrons). RF radiation has lower energy than some other types of non-ionizing radiation, like visible light and infrared, but it has higher energy than extremely low-frequency (ELF) radiation. [1]

[It’s not so low according to the above chart.  Microwave RFs are mid-range leaning toward higher ranges!  Do you see that square box under cell phone range?]

If RF radiation is absorbed in large enough amounts by materials containing water, such as food, fluids, and body tissues, it can produce heat. This can lead to burns and tissue damage. Although RF radiation does not cause cancer by damaging DNA in cells the way ionizing radiation does, there has been concern that some forms of non-ionizing radiation might have biological effects that could result in cancer in some circumstances. [1][One of the seriously grave deficits of microwave vested interests that propels the FCC and other government agencies in their microwave tolerance ranges is a deliberate failure and ‘scientific’ malfeasance in not recognizing non-thermal radiation waves (documented by independent and academic research in over 70% of studies) emitted by all microwave-operated appliances, towers, etc.   Note the ACS talks about heat, which is the only adverse reaction the microwave industry recognizes called “thermal radiation waves.”]

Man-made RF radiation is used for many different things, such as

  • Broadcasting radio and television signals
  • Transmitting signals from cordless telephones, cell phones and cell phone towers, satellite phones, and 2-way radios
  • Radar
  • WiFi and Bluetooth
  • Cooking food (in a microwave oven)
  • Heating body tissue to destroy them in medical procedures [that should be a clue!]
  • “Welding” pieces of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) using certain machines
  • Millimeter wave scanners (a type of full body scanner used for security screening) [1]

[Take special note of the “heating body tissue” above!  Microwaves interact with water and the human body is about 60% water with specific organs containing more, e.g., brain and heart, 73%.  All those innovative smart things we’ve become addicted to supply unseen microwaves and their consequential radiation waves to the human organism.]

However, most consumers really do not understand the ramifications surrounding non-ionizing radiation sources and waves.  In my opinion, there’s an article “Ghosts and spectra: The invisible world of WiFi signal bombardment”which, from the research I’ve done, seems misleading and not factual about Wi-Fi and EMF radiation wavelengths.  The photos in the article represent something else other than Wi-Fi, since that radiation is a ‘scatter’ effect for users to be able to access it “out of thin air” wherever it is available.  Something else probably is going on in those photos [e.g., lower dimensional; astral; or other spectra manifestations] or it’s ‘photo shop’ to create a special effect.  However, I don’t agree the photos represent Wi-Fi/EMF/RF radiation waves.

I’ve had people concerned about non-thermal radiation waves health effects contact me, especially experts in the field of EMFs/RFs/ELFs to say many groups claim to understand EMF but actually don’t.  According to one professional, “We know what radar, EMF, radiation patterns look like.  There are near-field pattern analysis and far-field pattern analysis diagrams.  These patterns change with respect to the human body’s anatomical structure and other incident fields.”

Interestingly, an EMF professional, who used a CORNET ED88T electrosmog meter to take various readings in several metropolitan areas, including a hospital where radiation cancer treatments are given, reports, “In most metropolitan areas, the RF power density readings exceeded the meter’s maximum reading of 1.8 W/m 2.  The US guidelines have a maximum exposure of 6.33 W/m 2.  The proximity to cell towers and large business or shopping areas are where the meter was over the range. [What are shoppers being exposed to?]  The new computer systems in the hospitals, Wi-Fi everywhere, and other EMF generating sources make these places a good place to stay away from if you absolutely do not have to be there.  The poor nurses, doctors, and volunteers do not know what they are doing to themselves.  They are definitely in the fast lane.”

To the above information, that EMF professional added, “All one can do is pray for the people located near or within these areas of maximum power density.  Although, even in the other areas that indicate caution, the sclerotic effects on the body are still cumulative over time.  What we do for convenience is tragic.”

Getting back to the “Ghosts and spectra” article photos mentioned above, there was a poignant comment posted in the Comments section by Tannaberton Abacrombie Apr 7, 2017 at 5:30 am, which explains the hidden aspects seemingly kept deliberately hidden and not revealed to consumers:

The artwork is deceptive. It shows a mass of waves around a small point when it actually fills every space and attenuates according to the inverse square law. It is truly everywhere. When I worked on the phaseout of WW2 Radar sets used as repeaters, etc. on the Trans Canada Telephone System, we had strict limits as to how much exposure we could be subject to while working. It was a lot less than what we bathe in now and those sets were considered leaky. Tests were done every two years for leakage and small spikes in background radiation were fixed…now. So as you sit there one meter from your WI-FI router turn around every now and then so you won’t get the cancer all on one side.

Yes!  Cancer is one of the unfortunate adverse health effects from long-range exposures to microwaves, especially Wi-Fi and children.  Here are only a couple research papers connecting microwave EMFs with cancer; there are hundreds, if not thousands, more!

  1. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150724123928.html
    Clear connection between wireless devices and cancer, experts say
  2. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 2015; 1 DOI: 10.3109/15368378.2015.1043557

Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation.

From all the research I’ve done, it is my candid opinion consumers don’t know what kind of adverse health effects tiger-by-the-tail they have fallen in love with, but can’t seem to want to extricate themselves from its mesmerizing grips until they must, due either to electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) issues or a litany of other health problems, including cancers.

Here’s what you can do.

Thursday, April 20, 2017, there will be a demonstration outside the FCC Offices (445 12th St SW, Washington, DC 20554) from 9:00 – 10:15 am to protest small cells beaming radiation into our homes 24/7, and to advocate/lobby for connecting all homes, schools, and businesses with safe, reliable, cyber-secure, fiber optic cables, the SAFEST technology to use systems-wide. You are encouraged also to attend the FCC’s open meeting, which will be held from 10:30 am to 12:30 pm.

References:

[1] Microwaves, Radio Waves, and Other Types of Radiofrequency Radiation
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/radiofrequency-radiation.html

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick(2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available

Americans Loose 127 Million IQ Points Per Year Due to Water Fluoridation by Corporate-Medical Fascists

As of this writing, fluoridation is something that the UNITED STATES Governmental Service Corporation forces upon its population in many areas.

The Nazis and Stalin put Fluoride in their water in prisons.  Fluoridation increased complacency of the inmates and thus reduced the guard requirements.  Fluoridation was far cheaper and more efficient compared to the costs of the guards.  Apparently the rate was 1 guard for every 4 prisoners, and fluoride in the water changed it to 1 guard for every 10 prisoners.

Fluoride is a Rat Poison

poison1

Fluoride is a toxic waste effluent of aluminum smelting.  Aluminum in the brain is linked to “Alzheimer’s Disease.”  The Aluminum contaminates the fluoride.  Fluoride is put in the water apparently for “medical purposes,” yet is NOT Medical Grade.  It contains all kinds of other impurities that cause human disease and disfunction.  Aluminum is in the fluoride…  how about cyanide?

Fluoride had to be MARKETED and SOLD to the public whom were not told the truth about the chemical.  Edward Bernays used his Uncle Sigmund Freud’s psychological reductionism techniques to create crafted propaganda to manufacture consent for putting fluoride in water.

Fluoride is a medication and controlled substance.  When Dispensing medication without a license nor Medical Prescription by tap water there are requirements in the CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ACT.  A waiver statement is required of the Attorney General for the dispensing by any state actor of a controlled substance such as Fluoride.

From the CDC, in 2014, the UNITED STATES, INC had a legal fictional population of 318,857,056 PERSON CORPORATIONS.  Their website even uses the LEGAL term PERSON, which is an ARTIFICIAL PERSON CORPORATION INSURANCE FRANCHISE TRADE-NAME TRUST ACCOUNT PRODUCT.   The Artificial Person is considered Type of “corporation” called an INDIVIDUAL (conveyance via personage/barratry).

From the CDC, in 2014, 284,099,832 persons were “tapped in” with fluoridated Water.  Many Bottled Water have fluoride added.

The Harvard Fluoridation Study of Fluoridation Studies found

The average loss in IQ was reported as a standardized weighted mean difference of 0.45, which would be approximately equivalent to seven IQ points for commonly used IQ scores with a standard deviation of 15.

284,099,832 * 0.45 IQ Points Per Year is a total of 127,844,924 IQ Points across all America are lost every year due to fluoridation.  127.8 MILLION IQ points per year.  How is this not seen as an actual attack on humanity?

The UNITED STATES is lagging severely behind in international education.  This is done ON PURPOSE.  Look into the atrocity called COMMON CORE Education being imposed across America if you have any doubts.

The most recent PISA results, from 2012, placed the U.S. an unimpressive 35th out of 64 countries in math and 27th in science

Just behind Slovakia and ahead of Lithuania in math.  For Science, behind Denmark and France, both countries known better for culinary skills and wine than scientific innovation.  (Not to knock the technology and science in these countries, just saying, many US Citizen Slaves assume: “WE’RE NUMBER ONE!!!” given the amount of money being spent on science and technology here.)

Fluoride undoubtably is a contributing cause of the IDIOCRACY.  The hazy consciousness state that fluoride induces helps Television Reality Distortion Entrainment and “normalization” of the corporate fear-based lack messages/propaganda.   They can’t sell anything when one is “content with life.”

What can you do about water Fluoridation?

  1. Install a Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration system.
  2. Call your local county water offices and if there is fluoride in the water.
    1. Demand/Request fluoride be STOPPED due to IQ loss in children.
    2. FOIA Request the FLUORIDE Purchase Order to check if the fluoride is medical grade.
    3. File an Insurance Claim with the “PUBLIC OFFICIAL” BOND (read: insurance) company for loss of IQ points.
  3.  Hold meetings with friends, family, and neighbors.
  4. Go to Public Corporate Hearings to discuss the cost savings of not putting fluoride in the water.  The cost savings could be put to other uses like road repair or other public corporate programs
  5. Have a Flash Mob show up at the County Water Department demanding answers for why they continue harming people.
  6. By Direct Action, place “public officials” under “civil arrest” for continuing the human rights atrocity called FLUORIDATION.  There is no law that allows public officials to intentionally (and yet intentionally with plausible deniability) allows them to commit the human rights atrocity of destroying 127.8 million IQ points per year across America.
  7. Place “public officials” as artificial persons under “civil arrest” as a symbolic protest for continuing the human rights atrocity called FLUORIDATION.
  8. Call the Sheriff to report fluoridation medical crimes of the county, en mass on the same day, with at least 3 friends and family making their own call.
  9. Request that the Sheriff give all jail inmates clean drinking water, unless he can produce a CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ACT exemption letter.  File PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND requests.

The Crime is enabled by all levels of UNITED STATES, INC governmental services corporation.  The Federal Government is in on it with the CDC, FDA, FBI, etc.  The States are in on it; no State Agency investigates fluoride as a crime, particularly if it is a “STATUTORY CODE” requirement.   The County’s won’t investigate because they dispense it to their artificial person citizens and without any investigation.  They refuse to do anything about it now…  because that would create liability from their prior actions, so the only course of action is to “deny” that fluoride is harmful.

Here is a short list of harmful effects from Fluoride:

Arthritis Gastrointestinal Effects
Bone Fracture Hypersensitivity
Brain Effects Kidney Disease
Cancer Male Fertility
Cardiovascular Disease Pineal Gland
Diabetes Skeletal Fluorosis
Endocrine Disruption Thyroid Disease
Acute Toxicity

Fluoride is EXPENSIVE to add to water, Lacks any positive effects for teeth, and is padding the health industry profits with all kinds of needless disease.

It is this author’s theory that the Water Distribution Industry and the County’s are PAID OFF by the ALUMINUM SMELTING COMPANIES to distribute fluoride toxic waste effluent in the water because all other methods of disposal are far more expensive!

Just to be clear…

a total of 127,844,924  IQ Points across all America are lost every year due to fluoridation.  A Loss of 127.8 million IQ Points per year is a human rights atrocity of unimaginable proportion.

If it is assumed that the average “US Citizen/Slave” Legal Fictional Presence has an IQ of 100, then it is the equivalent of 1.27 million people being murdered by fluoride (rat poison) in the water every year.  It is just not being observed; as the people aren’t missing…  just the intelligence.  FYI, that’s 350,260 IQ Points Per Day, every day.

The loss is about 0.45 IQ points per year per person.  The effect is slow…  and apparently effective.  The Idiocracy is upon us.

Thankfully, There are greater Energies upgrading Human Consciousness.

Fluoride in the Water is Mass Medication and a War Crime

The HIDDEN History Of Fluoride

The HIDDEN History Of Fluoride

by Gregg Prescott, M.S.
BodyMindSoulSpirit.com

Once you find out the hidden history behind fluoride, you will never intentionally ingest it again!  Fluoride is commonly found in water supplies and toothpaste, but you will also find it in processed foods made with tap water as well as in chemtrails.  Fluoride is a toxic waste that is so poisonous that it cannot be dumped into the ocean or any water supply.

If you look at the back of any fluoridated toothpaste, you will find a warning saying that if you swallow a pea-sized amount of toothpaste, you are supposed to call the poison control center.  According to Dr. Bill Osmunson, a “pea-sized” amount of fluoride is found in every small glass of fluoridated tap water.

The following is a shocking history of fluoride.  After reading this, many will agree that it the use of fluoride is incomprehensible and can easily be considered “crimes against humanity”.

1931 Fluoride in drinking water is found to be the cause of brown teeth – now known as dental fluorosis.

1931 H.Trendley Dean of the U.S. Public Health Service initiates studies on fluorides under the jurisdiction of Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon. Mellon is founder of Alcoa aluminum, who is one of the main suppliers of toxic sodium fluoride as a by-product of aluminum manufacture. He publishes a purposely skewed study showing that, at 1ppm, fluoride results in the reduction of tooth decay.

1940 Soviet concentration camps maintained by fluoride administration to inmates to decrease resistance to authority and induce physical deteriorization.

1942 Germany becomes world’s largest producer of aluminum (and Sodium Fluoride)

1943 Researchers from the US Public Health Service examine the health of residents of Bartlett, Texas to see if the 8ppm fluoride in the drinking water was affecting their health. It was checked again in 1953. They find that the death rate in Bartlett was three times higher than a neighboring town which contained 0.4 ppm fluoride.

1943 The Journal of the American Medical Association on September 18, 1943, states, “fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons, changing the permeability of the cell membrane by inhibiting certain enzymes. The exact mechanism of such actions are obscure. The sources of fluorine intoxication are drinking water containing 1ppm or more of fluorine, fluorine compounds used as insecticidal sprays for fruits and vegetables (cryolite and barium fluoro- silicate) and the mining and conversion of phosphate rock to superphosphate, which is used as a fertilizer. That process alone releases approximately 25,000 tons of pure fluorine into the atmosphere annually.”

1944 The city manager of Grand Rapids, Michigan announces that the Michigan State Department of Health is planning a long range experiment with fluoridated water and that Grand Rapids was selected as the location for the experiment. The city commission approves a motion to fluoridate on July 31, and decide it is to begin in January 1945, despite the warning issued three months earlier by the American Dental Association. Grand Rapids becomes the first city in the United States to conduct this experiment. It was to serve as the test city to be compared against un-fluoridated Muskegon for a period of ten years relative to tooth decay, at which time it would be determined whether or not fluoride was “safe and effective.” Dr. H. Trendley Dean was put in charge of the project. The experiment was terminated early with the pronouncement that fluorides in public water supplies was “safe”. See 1945.

1944 Oscar Ewing is put on the payroll of the Aluminum Company of America (ALCOA), as an attorney, at an annual salary of $750,000. Within a few months, Ewing was made Federal Security Administrator, with the announcement that he was taking a big cut in salary. The US Public Health Service, then a division of the FSA, comes under the command of Ewing , and he begins to vigorously promote fluoridation nationwide.
Ref: May 25-27 Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce.

A by-product of aluminum manufacture is toxic. Ewing’s public relations strategist for the fluoride campaign was the nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward L. Bernays. Bernays conducts a public relations campaign to promote fluorine ingestion by applying Freudian theory to induce public acceptance. It was one of Bernays most successful campaigns.

1944 The Journal of the American Dental Association on October 1, 1944 warned that “We do know that the use of drinking water containing as little as 1.2 to 3.0 ppm of fluorine will cause such developmental disturbances in bones as osteoporosis, and we cannot run the risk of producing such systemic disturbances in applying what at present is a doubtful procedure intended to prevent development of dental disfigurement in children. In the light of our present knowledge or lack of knowledge of the chemistry of the subject, the potentialities for harm far outweigh those for good.”

1945 Newburgh, New York has their water supply fluoridated. Subsequent exams of the children by x-ray reveal that almost 14% have cortical defects in bone, compared to the nearby unfluoridated town of Kingston, where 7.5% have bone defects.

1945 As a result of government propaganda on fluorides, the ten year Michigan study was terminated after 1 year. The fluoride-free control city, Muskegon, was then fluoridated to conceal any differential between the two cities.

1948 Study done in England where bone defects in three groups of school boys were studied. Two groups were from districts where the water supply was practically free of fluorine. The third group was from the town of Launton, where the natural water supply contains 1ppm of fluorine (the same as the level deemed “safe” by the U.S. Public Health Service). X-ray examination revealed that 20 percent of the first two groups had mild non-specific spinal irregularities. In the third group, the one consuming 1ppm fluoride in their water, 64% were found to have spinal defects, and lesions were more severe.

1950 Soviets add fluoride to water in prison system to maintain subservience in the inmate population.

1951 The U.S. Public Health Service, with the cooperation of the American Dental Association, holds a meeting of state dental directors at which the methods for promotion of fluoridation are outlined. A concentration of 1.2 ppm was suggested, and state dental directors were instructed to lie to the public about the toxic effects of sodium fluoride. They were to deliberately misinform the public by relating the presence of “high-fluoride areas” to “less cancer and less polio” – an entire public relations campaign meant to convince the public to allow themselves to be medicated.

1952 The American Dental Association publishes an issue of its Journal instructing its dentists not to discuss their personal opinions about fluoride.

1952 From 1952 to 1956, the cities on the “fluoridation list” began to fluoridate their water supplies. As the process of water fluoridation continued, the cancer death rate of the fluoridated cities began to far exceed the rate of the unfluoridated cities.

1952 US Representative Dr.A.L.Miller, Chairman of the Special Committee on Chemicals and Foods, stated, “I sometimes wonder if ALCOA Aluminum and its subsidiaries might not have a deep interest in getting rid of sodium fluoride, a toxic waste product of the aluminum industry. In this connection it is interesting to note that the person in charge of the public health, Oscar Ewing, is also an attorney for ALCOA.”

1952 82nd Congress, 2nd Session, Hearings of the Select Committee to Investigate Use of Chemicals in Food and Cosmetics. Dr. Miller “The US Dental Association made some examination and recommended to the farmers that fluorine not be added to the water of pregnant sows because it did something to the pigs that were unborn”

Dr. Porterfield “There is more money available for matters that have economic value, than there is for health.”

1954 A study is published which links fluorides and the development of cancer in animals.
Ref: A Taylor, “Sodium Fluoride in the Drinking Water of Mice”, Dental Digest, Vol 60, pp170-172.

1954 C.E.Perkins, I.G.Farben chemist, admits fluoride is to reduce resistance in people to authority.

1956 March 1956 issue of the Journal of the American Dental Association, H.C. Hodge remarks, “skeletal deposition of fluoride is a continuing process in which a considerable portion of the ingested fluoride, perhaps 25 to 50%, is deposited in the skeleton.”

1957 In a 1957 AMA report it was stated ” It is too early to know what the effects of artificial fluoridation will be. What is reported as a reduction in dental decay may in fact be a delay in recognition of decay, and reasons given for believing that artificially fluoridated water will have the same effects as water with natural fluoride are not valid.”

1957 Records for New Britain, Connecticut (where the use of industrial fluorides had been in use for 6 years) showed that some of the children’s teeth had been damaged beyond repair where the water is fluoridated. Even when the percentage of industrial fluorine is kept at or below 1 ppm, mottling is produced in 10-15% of the children examined. Mottled teeth are teeth showing symptoms of fluorosis, and the enamel of mottled teeth is brittle and subject to mechanical injury which is difficult or impossible to repair.

1958 In October 1958, Dr. J.F. Montague, a medical doctor, published material reflecting his growing concern over fluoridation in the Journal of the International College of Surgeons, connecting the presence of fluorine in the human body to cancer.

1958 An interesting piece of work was done by Dr. James Kerwin, a dentist, in which it was shown that the simultaneous presence of fluorine and strontium 90 in the human body may result in a greater accumulation of both substances in which compounds like strontium fluoride are formed. Because of the low solubility of these substances, the body has a very hard time getting rid of them. His report was published in Dental Digest in February 1958.

1959 In the report of the proceedings of the 3rd Medical-Dental Conference on the Evaluation of Fluoridation, held on March 7, 1959 in New York City, the committee concluded that “It is apparent that the practice of fluoridation is not the simple, trustworthy procedure that the promoting authorities have given the profession and the public to believe.

Added to the lack of control of fluorides at the consumers tap are these major uncertainties: the gross variation in individual water consumption, the varied intake of fluorides in food and the fluoride intake from atmospheric and occupational exposure. These unpredictable issues make meaningless any talk about “controlled individual fluorine intake.” Most, if not all of this research has been buried by the authorities, who maintain glibly that “fluoride compounds are safe in the water supply”.

1959 Fluorides were used as an enzyme inhibitor in a study by J.D. Ebert that was published in 1959 on the metabolic pathways by which organs in an embryo are formed. In low concentrations, he found that sodium fluoride blocked almost completely the regions destined to form muscle, primarily affecting the heart muscle. In higher concentrations, it caused the entire embryo to disintegrate in a clear-cut pattern, starting with the heart-forming region.

1959 As early as 1959, the knowledge existed that the presence of fluoride in human bodies hastens the absorption of radioactive substances present in the environment. In a report to the Atomic Energy Commission’s Division of Biology and Medicine entitled “The Metabolism of Alkaline Earth Metals by Bone” by F.W. Lengemann, professor of chemistry at the University of Tennessee on March 23, 1959, it was scientifically shown that the presence of fluorine and other environmental substances such as lead and cyanide in the human body increased the ratio of strontium 90 to calcium in bone.

1959 The Ontario Minister of Health, Dr. Dymond, announced that no further fluoridation would be permitted there, because “no one knows for sure what the effect is to persons given fluoride throughout a lifetime.”

1959 In research conducted on the incidence of Mongolism in cities in Wisconsin, Illinois and the Dakotas published in 1959 in the official publication of the French Academy of Medicine, it was found that as the percentage of fluorides in the water rose, there was a parallel rise in the incidence of Mongoloid births.

The age of the mothers giving birth to Mongoloid babies also declined with rising fluoride levels. It is interesting that in the first three years of fluoridation, New Britain, Connecticut experienced a 150% rise in still births.

1960 The American Dental Association issued a pamphlet for public consumption called Fluoridation Facts: Answers to Criticisms of Fluoridation. In defense of the use of toxic fluoride compounds in public water supplies (which is a grievous crime against humanity, since it means mandated involuntary public medication), they used the logic that “people have been known to live to a ripe old age” in areas where the water supply is fluoridated.

Unfortunately, they neglected to mention that the addition of fluoride to the water supply correlated directly with the number of still births, mongoloid children, brittle teeth and enlarged dental root structures, adverse spinal conditions, osteomalacia (softening of the bones) and osteoporosis (abnormally porous and spaced structure inside bone) in the medicated population as opposed to control populations that were unmedicated.

1961 In Great Britain, Dr. R.A.Holman of the Royal Institute of Pathology discussed fluoride poisoning in an article in the April 15, 1961 issue of the British Medical Journal. He noted that the long-term effects of sodium fluoride ingestion needed much more investigation. He said “Fluoride is a well-known inhibitor of several enzyme systems”.

1963 A study is published which links fluorides and development of cancer in animals. Ref: Irwin Herskowitz and Isabel Norton “Increased Incidence of Melanotic Tumors…Following Treatment with Sodium Fluoride”, Genetics, Vol 48, pp307-310.

1971 Germany bans water fluoridation.

1973 Netherlands bans water fluoridation.

1974 The Safe Water Drinking Act is passed. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets maximum contamination levels (MCL) for various water pollutants, including sodium fluoride. The EPA sets the fluoride contamination level at an unbelievable 1.4 ppm for “warmer climates” and up to 2.4 ppm for “colder climates”. Furthermore, the American Dental Association begins pressuring the EPA to raise the MCL for fluoride in public water to 8 ppm, when it is fully known that systemic damage occurs below 1 pmm.

The National Drinking Water Advisory Council refuses to recommend raising the fluoride MCL, and came close to recommending its lowering. However, the EPA farmed out research work to ICAIR Life Systems, which issues a fraudulent report (confirmed by ICAIR employee Dr. John Beaver). The report is woven into the US EPA report on fluoride, resulting in the EPA recommendation of MCL for sodium fluoride in public water to be 4 ppm.

1975 Dr. John Yiamouyiannis publishes a preliminary survey which shows that people in fluoridated areas have a higher cancer death rate than those in non-fluoridated areas. The National Cancer Institute attempts to refute the studies.

Later in 1975, Yiamouyiannis joins with Dr. Dean Burk, chief chemist of the National Cancer Institute (1939-1974) in performing other studies which are then included in the Congressional Record by Congressman Delaney. Delaney was the original author of the Delaney Amendment, which prohibited the addition of cancer-causing substances to food used for human consumption. Both reports confirmed the existence of a link between fluoridation and cancer.

1976 Dr. D.W.Allman and co-workers from Indiana University School of Medicine feed animals 1 part-per-million (ppm) fluoride and notice the urinary levels and tissue levels of a substance called cyclic AMP (adenosine monophosphate) increased by more than 100%. They also found that in the presence of aluminum in a concentration as small as 20 parts per billion, fluoride is able to cause an even larger increase in cyclic AMP levels.

1977 The Congressional Subcommitee on Intergovernmental Relations convenes two (2) full Congressional Hearings on the subject of fluorides. During the hearing, it was proven that:

1.     The “scientific efforts” of those promoting fluoridation were fraudulent, and

2.     Other existing studies proved beyond a doubt that approximately 10,000 excess cancer deaths per year could be attributed to fluoridation in the United States.

1977 Congressional representative L.H. Fountain, chairman of the 1977 Sub- Committee Hearings on Fluoride, states that “the carcinogenic nature of fluorideremains unanswered” and orders the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS – who is in on the fluoride conspiracy anyway) “to conduct animal studies to see if fluoride causes cancer”.

Dr. Herman Kraybill, from the National Cancer Institute (who in 1972 had been chosen by NCI to write a memo saying that fluorides do not cause cancer) was placed in charge of these studies. Kraybill boldly states, “this will be the final study to confirm negativity of fluoride ions in carcinogenesis.” He cites 13 studies having nothing to do with the subject of fluorides and cancer in order to support his claim that “no link between fluorides and cancer existed.” (NCI Director Dr. Arthur Upton later admitted the 13 studies had nothing to do with the subject of the study). (See 1982, 1985,1988)

1977 Congressional Hearings were held in which Dr.Yiamouyiannis and Dr. Burk were able to show that the increase in deaths were due to water fluoridation. At the conclusion of the hearings, Representative Fountain and his committee instructed the United States Public Health Service (well known by now for questionable and dangerous medical advisory practices which benefit the medical and pharmaceutical industries) to conduct animal studies to “determine whether or not fluoride causes cancer”.

1978 The German magazine Stern reports on the Turkish village of Kizilcaoern, where the drinking water contains 5ppm fluorides. All of the children have brown teeth. Women produce dead babies after only four months of pregnancy. All the inhabitants suffer from tremendous premature aging. The same fluoride-related brittle-bone disorders have been observed among people drinking water with as little as 0.7 ppm fluoride.

1978 A court case was won in Pennsylvania that proved fluoridation was harmful and resulted in a ban. It received great publicity, much to the concern of the American Dental Association and the industry. (See 1979)

1979 In order to counteract the tide of truth on fluorides, the American Dental Association (ADA) issues a “white paper” on fluoridation. It characterizes opponents of public water fluoridation as “uninformed, self-styled experts whose qualifications for speaking out on such a scientific issue as fluoridation were practically nonexistent, or whose motivation was self-serving.”

1979 The January 20th edition of the New York Times carries a story in which a child was killed because of a lethal dose of fluoride at a city dental clinic. The parents were awarded $750,000.

1979 Dr.W.L. Gabler and Dr.P.A.Long at the University of Oregon Health Sciences Center find that as little as 0.2 ppm fluoride in the body (the “safe” level for public water supplies is 1.0 ppm, 8 times higher) stimulates superoxide production in resting white blood cells. This seriously depresses the ability of white blood cells to destroy pathogenic agents. Superoxide in the bloodstream also gives rise to tissue damage and acceleration of the aging process. Ref: “Fluoride Inhibition of Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes”, Journal of Dental Research, Vol 48, No.9, p1933-1939, 1979.

1979 On November 11th, up to 50ppm fluoride was dumped into the Annapolis Maryland water supply, resulting in the poisoning of 50,000 people. Many died of heart failure during the week following the spill.

1981 Dr.Robert Clark from the Boston University Medical Center shows that fluorides (as in fluoridated water supplies, toothpaste, etc) stimulate granule formation and oxygen consumption in white blood cells when they were not challenged with a foreign agent, but inhibited these processes when the white blood cell needed them to fight off foreign agents.
Ref: “Neutrophil Iodination Reaction Induced by Fluoride: Implications for Degranulation and Metabolic Activation” Blood, Vol 57, pp913-921, 1981.

1983 A symposium takes place at the University of Michigan after years of planning between the US Dept of Health and Human Services, the USPHS Michigan state health plans, the Kellogg Foundation, and Medical Products Labs. The purpose is to “discuss the status of organized opposition to fluoridation, to analyze probable motives influencing the anti-fluoride movement, to develop political and legal strategies for the defense and promotion of fluoridation, and to assess the need for a national fluoridation strategy.”

1984 The 1984 issue of Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products indicates that 1/10 oz of fluoride in the human body is lethal for a 100 pound adult human. Fluoride toothpaste contains up to 1mg/gram of fluoride. A whole tube contains about 199 mg of fluoride – enough to kill a 25-pound child. Tooth brushing causes ingestion of 0.25 mg/day.

1984 Researchers in Japan were achieving some degree of understanding about fluorides consumption and human cancer. Dr. Takeki Tsutsui of the Nippon Dental College showed in 1984 that “fluoride caused not only genetic damage but was also capable of transforming normal human cells into cancer cells.”

In Dr.Tsutsui’s study, the level of fluoride used was the same level that the United States National Cancer Institute suggested should be used in a study to determine whether fluoridation of public water supplies causes cancer. The level of fluoride deemed “safe” by the United States in 1 ppm. The researchers in Japan found that cells treated with fluoride produced cancer.

1985 Dental hygienists, psychiatrists, public relations experts, education specialists and psychologists (no scientists) form “The American Oral Health Institute” and release a book “Abuse of the Scientific Literature in an Antifluoridation Pamphlet”. In it they attack scientific data relative to fluoride and those who oppose its use in the public water supply. An examination of the book, ironically, revealed “abuse of scientific literature” on the part of the authors, who demonstrated their lack of scientific expertise and themselves were guilty of deception and misrepresentation of scientific fact.

1989 On March 30, 1989, the California Department of Health Services reported that Niagara brand bottled water was found to contain 450ppm fluoride. The state health director, Kenneth Kizer, warned residents that consumption could be fatal.

1989 Dr.Yiamouyiannis used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain carcinogenicity studies conducted by Proctor and Gamble (one of the makers of fluoridated toothpaste) that were submitted to (and covered up by) the United States Public Health Service.

These studies showed dose dependent cell abnormalities caused by fluoride. These results were reported in the February 22, 1990 issue of the Medical Tribune. Additional studies by Proctor and Gamble scientists confirmed the link between oral precancerous growth and fluoride, as well as an increase in osteomas (bone tumors) and osteosarcomas (bone cancer).

In fact, the National Cancer Institute found in 1991 that the incidence of bone cancer was 50% higher in men ages 0-19 years of age exposed to fluoridated water compared to those who were not.

1989 A study by Hildebolt, et al. on 6,000 school children contradicts any alleged benefit from the use of sodium fluorides.

1989 On February 23, 1989, Battelle released the results of its study of fluorides on mice. A most curious result of the study, from the USPHS point of view, was that fluoride induced the occurrence of an extremely rare form of liver cancer, called hepatocholangio carcinoma, in fluoride-treated male and female mice. Two months later in April of 1989, Battelle released the results of its study of fluorides and rats. The study showed a dose-dependent relationship between the incidence of oral cancerous tumors and fluorides.

As a response to the Battelle study, the National Cancer Institute from examined the incidence of oral cancer in fluoridated and non-fluoridated countries over the period from 1973 to 1987. The National Cancer Institute study found that as exposure to fluoridation increases, so does the incidence of oral cancer; sometimes as much as a 50% increase in oral cancer rates occur in fluoridated areas. This translates to 8,000 new cases of oral and pharyngeal cancer per year, needless pain and suffering and a financial windfall to the medical and pharmaceutical factions that concern themselves with treatment.

1990 The National Toxicology Program issues a Press Release with data confirming findings of a link between fluoride and osteosarcomas as well as higher rates of oral cancer in rats. (January 1990)

1990 The American Dental Association issues a Press Release which states “water fluoridation remains the safest, most effective, and most economical public health measure to reduce tooth decay.”

1990 The National Toxicology Program in February 1990 releases its pathological data tables with a cover letter which, in a turnabout, claims “there has not been any evidence that shows a relationship between fluoridation and cancer or any other diseases in humans”, and “water fluoridation has proven highly effective in improving the nation’s dental health by markedly reducing tooth decay”.

The NTP final report, issued in March, omitted all studies which showed genetic damage from fluorides, and important studies showing that fluorides induce tumors and cancers were ignored. Kraybill, head of the NTP study, becomes a consultant to the American Council of Science and Health (ACSH), who threatens to sue the EPA if it “tries to undermine public confidence in fluoride.”

1990 Dr. John Colquhoun in New Zealand is forced into early retirement in New Zealand after he conducts a study on 60,000 school children and finds no difference in tooth decay between fluoridated and unfluoridated areas. He additionally finds that a substantial number of children in fluoridated areas suffered from dental fluorosis. He makes the study public.

1990 The September 14th issue of Newsweek reports that the study performed by Battelle Memorial Institute under Congressional mandate to look into fluorides and animal cancer (that found a connection) was refused for publication by the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

1992 Michael Perrone, a legislative assistant in New Jersey, contacts the FDA requesting all information regarding the safety and effectiveness of fluoride tablets and drops. After 6 months of stalling, the FDA admitted they had no data to show that fluoride tablets or drops were either safe or effective. They informed Perrone that they will “probably have to pull the tablets and drops off the market.”

 Did You Know…

Studies by Doctors H.S. Brown, D.R. Bishop and C.A. Rowan in the early 1980s demonstrated that an average of 64% of the total dose of waterborne contaminants, such as fluoride, are absorbed through the skin(American Journal of Public Health 1984; 74: 479-84) —Fluoride: Drinking Ourselves to Death, Barry Groves, pp. 275-265

Fluoride is so toxic, that if a 5 gallon bucket were to be dumped in the ocean, it would kill all nearby sea life.

A study by Professor Julian Andelman, Professor of Water Chemistry at the University of Pittsburg’s Graduate School of Public Health, “found less chemical exposure from drinking the water than from using it to wash clothes or take a shower or a dip in the swimming pool”. Every time you take a shower or go for a swim, you will be soaking it up. The percentage for skin absorption are as follows: Scalp – 32%, Ear Canal – 46%, Forehead – 36%, Plant of Foot – 13%, Forearm – 9%, Palm – 12%, Male Scrotum – 100%.

Dr. Dean Burk, Chief Chemist Emeritus of the National Cancer Institute published a paper in 1975 that detailed an increase in cancer deaths in fluoridated areas. According to Burk, “In point of fact, fluoride causes more cancer, and causes it faster, than any other chemical”.

Fluoride is NOT essential. In 1979, the FDA required the deletion of all government references previously classifying fluoride as “essential or probably essential”, (Federal Register, March 16, 1979, page 16006).

Robert Carton, PhD formerly President of the union of Government Scientists working at the US Environmental Protection Agency said: “Water fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century, if not of all time.” In 1997, more than 1,000 members of this union working at USEPA HQ in Washington DC, who are directly responsible for the US Safe Drinking Water Act, voted UNANIMOUSLY to ban water fluoridation. Their bosses are not listening.

There is not a single scientific or laboratory study from anywhere in the world which proves that fluoridation reduces tooth decay in humans. There are, however, hundreds of published scientific papers which show that water fluoridation is dangerous to human, animal, plant and aquatic life, which is no surprise, since fluoride is more toxic than lead and only marginally less so than arsenic. (Clinical Toxicology of Commercial Products, 5th ed., Gosselin, et al, 1984.).

Fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons, probably because of their capacity to modify the metabolism of cells by changing the permeability of the cell membrane and by inhibiting certain enzyme system.  The sources of fluorine intoxication are drinking water containing 1 ppm or more of fluorine, fluorine compounds used as insecticidal sprays for fruits and vegetables (cryolite and barium fluosilicate) and the mining and conversion of phosphate rock to superphosphate, which is used as fertilizer. The fluorine content of phosphate rock, about 25% of the fluorine present, is volatilized and represents a pouring into the atmosphere of approximately 25,000 tons of pure fluorine annually.  The known effects of chronic fluorine intoxication are those of hypophasia of the teeth, which has been called mottled enamel, and of bone sclerosis.”
Journal of the American Medical Association, editorial, September 18, 1943 (123:50)

Hitler’s rumored connection to using fluoridated the water in Nazi prison camps.:

“When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world. …

“I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great IG Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years` research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine–any person who drinks artificially fluoridated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically.”
CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954

Additionally:

The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in Germany’s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride’s supposed effect on children’s teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission.
(Ref. book: “The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben” by Joseph Borkin.)

Chemtrails now contain fluoride.  Researcher Dane Wigington recently stated that the last 60 water tests from Norway and Germany have contained fluoride in the results and is not the result from any industrial process or processing.  It is interesting to note that water fluoridation is not allowed in either of these countries.

Use Facebook to Comment on this Post

Tags: 

CategoryAwarenessLifestyleScience


NOTES:

If the fluoride issue may also be framed as such: Is the fluoride medical grade?  Because if it’s being put in the water for medical purposes, it better be medical grade Fluoride Medication!  Furthermore, the dispensing of a controlled substance,  such as fluoride, requires certain documentation such as prescriptions, Controlled Substance Act Exemptions from certain government officials, etc.  While the per water unit may not be enough to “activate medication status”, in their minds, we must remember that they have a much larger quantity on hand, slowly being dripped into the water supply.  These larger quantities are “regulated” as is dispensing fluoride for medical purposes.  Many have encountered the cognitive dissonance of: if the quantity of fluoride in the water doesn’t trigger medical status of the controlled substance act due to not having medical effects, but fluoride is put in the water for medical effects, which is it?

These governmental service corporation people are not all lacking intelligence:  For the most part, the reason for not acknowledging the harmful effects of fluoridated water is insurance liability.  For the public officials pretending to be leaders, fluoride’s removal from water must be framed so as not implicate anyone…  it was just their job.  There are very likely kick-backs in the fluoridated water game…  as the fluoride is waste effluent of industrial processes and difficult to get rid of otherwise.  To off load it cheaply, or to even be paid for it would be ideal in the corporate mentality.  Attorneys could even swing it with debt negotiable instruments so all parties get paid!  Negotiable instruments can be and often are duplicated as insurance products and other “instruments of debt” by banks, governmental service corporations, attorneys, registrar clerks (clerics), corporations, etc.

Brands of Water with pH, ORP, and Fluoride Content.

Century of Self, a BBC documentary on Edward Bernays -nephew of Sigmund Freud, has a segment on the use of Freud’s methods by Bernays to sway public opinion on the fluoridation of water.