UBS Bank Whistleblower- Brad Birkenfeld: Lucifer’s Banker- Worse Than Anyone Thought Possible

Brad Birkenfeld: Lucifer’s Banker

A whistle-blower’s account of exposing massive fraud at UBS
Sunday, April 16, 2017, 1:14 PM

Lucifers Banker book cover

Just how bad is the ongoing fraud in the banking system? Get ready for a mind-bowing expose by a former insider at UBS.

Brad Birkenfield, author of Lucifer’s Banker: The Untold Story of How I Destroyed Swiss Bank Secrecy, recounts the efforts he uncovered by his employer to help its clients cheat the US government out of tens of $billions in taxes.

But despite his working with the government closely to expose the gigantic conspiracy between US-based tax cheats and the giant Swiss bank, UBS, the so-called Justice Department went after Mr. Birkenfeld for abetting tax evasion by one of his clients. After spending thirty months in Federal prison, he was released and three weeks later, received a whistle-blower check for $104 million, the largest such check ever from the IRS Whistle-blower Office.

Once again, 300,000,000 Americans-plus got screwed by the corrupt Department of Justice. They’re not about justice, they’re about protecting themselves, trying to take credit, and making everyone else listen to what they say the story is.

We remember the financial crisis of 2008. It was devastating and so many people lost their jobs, lost their homes and so forth. In the entire financial crisis, there was not one banker to go to jail. The only banker to go to jail was the UBS whistleblower who exposed the largest and longest running tax fraud in the world.

Here’s the problem with the system. When you fine UBS you must realize UBS is a Swiss bank, so that means they write off the fine on their taxes. So then, that means the Swiss taxpayers carry the burden. That’s the first thing.

The second thing is go look at the millions and millions of dollars in legal fees spent to defend their conduct. The UBS shareholders pick up that tab.

So you have UBS shareholders and Swiss citizens picking up the tab for bankers who just keep doing their business, and walk away untouched. How is this possible?

And third, the US government has set an incredibly bad precedent and zero deterrence. Because what they’re saying is, “Oh, if you get caught again, you just write a check. Yes, you might have to add $5 million or $10 million to that check, but just keep doing the business you’re doing.”

And the pathetic prosecutors at the Department of Justice say, “Oh, see? We’ve got a check and we can put it on our resume saying, ‘We got $200 million from this bank for doing illegal conduct.’”

Yeah, but you screwed the American people. It’s outrageous.

Click the play button below to listen to Chris’ interview with Brad Birkenfeld (45m:31s).

Click here for the textual transcript.

Social Security Numbers are only for FEDERAL EMPLOYEES

This is important because if the only reason why IRS TAXES are paid is that one is voluntarily employed as Withholding Agents— Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marines, then Minimum Wage Applies!

To put this in perspective, the ARTIFICIAL PERSON is a JOB.  Each Birth Certificate, Social Security Number, Driver’s License, Voter IDentity (card), Passport is unto itself AN EMPLOYED JOB that REQUIRES MINIMUM WAGE.  This minimum wage applies 24-7, 365 days per year for employment in each of these JOBS.  In the UNITED STATES, INC, this form of UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME has been required since 1938…  and we can and should demand back pay at this time.  Production is being hampered by hyper creation of debt outside the legitimate economy, AI and robots are taking over.  Simultaneously, the Governmental Service Corporations are laying claim to ALL computers and AI!

Simply for HAVING a Social Security/Driver’s License artificial person, the Federal Gov. Service Corp./STATE is required by minimum wage to be paying us, the human, for employment into the public position.  This applies to all nations, including and not limited to: Russia, China, Japan, India, Saudi Arabia, Israel, North Korea, South Korea, Mexico, Canada, Australia, all UK, European Union, South Africa, and even Costa Rica, Bahamas, Puerto Rico, and Cuba!  All “nations” are Governmental Service Corporations that use ARTIFICIAL PERSON concepts to overlay a corporation over the human, but without attorneys being honest and telling us that this is what they do.

The corporation overlay is what degrades human rights into corporate benefits and why corporate personhood is so important…  humans can only retain “rights” as trade-name/trusts/insurance franchise/corporations if corporations are given personhood.

Corporate Personhood is a mere “LEGAL FICTION” and entirely UNTRUE -a farce-, just like death, and birth are “LEGAL FICTIONS”.  We are all eternal souls.

Public Notice Provided to All Federal Employees and Agency Personnel Including IRS/Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Personnel

by: Paul Stramer

Social Security Numbers can only be issued to federal “employees” / “citizens” for use only in the performance of their official duties.  See 20 CFR §422.104.  SSN’s used as TIN’s apply to the same Persons/PERSONS.

That is, only federal Persons (Territorials) or PERSONS (Municipals) can be issued Social Security Account Numbers/TIN’s and that is the way it has always been, except…….

FDR and the Federal WWII Era Congress got around this and included millions of patriotic Americans by conscripting “volunteers” who agreed to pay federal income taxes as a “Victory Tax”. They did this by arbitrarily defining such voluntary taxpayers as Withholding Agents— Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marines.

The Victory Tax was supposed to sunset upon the “cessation of hostilities”, however, in September of 1945, Congress conveniently forgot to put a specific end date on this arrangement and the Internal Revenue Service continued to collect –thus changing this from a voluntary arrangement to help win the war– to an international extortion racket.

This is your reminder that the Second World War hostilities ended in September of 1945.

Any American “volunteer” who isn’t actually and naturally eligible for Social Security and who wishes to “retire” from the presumption of federal service and who revokes their election to pay federal taxes must be immediately set free and permanently released from any obligation to report, to pay, or accept responsibility for any federal Person/PERSON, and cannot otherwise be encumbered, imposed upon, or subjected by any agency or department of the federal territorial or municipal government (s).

Compulsory “citizenship” does not exist.

Those who have “retired” after becoming vested in the Social Security System as a result of this abuse are owed all their money back and/or all services promised at the time of their enrollment with no presumption of continued federal citizenship or its obligations attaching to them.

The continued issuance of Social Security Numbers to people who aren’t actually federal employees and either United States Citizens or citizens of the United States is illegal entrapment under conditions of non-disclosure and deceit; it results in mischaracterization of political status, involuntary servitude,  identity theft, unlawful conversion of assets and other evils of racketeering committed against Americans who have been deliberately misinformed and told that they have to enroll in Social Security as a requirement of having a job—-any job.

Enrollment in Social Security is only required if they happen to be seeking direct employment with the federal government or are otherwise legitimately considered federal government dependents—verifiable political asylum seekers, etc.

Those born in one of the actual states of the Union who retire from such employment, including military employment, or who, owing no natural allegiance to the Territorial or Municipal governments, and having never been employed by the federal government(s), simply realize these facts and revoke their “election” to pay federal income taxes and cease thereafter to function as voluntary Withholding Agents must be set free from the presumption of any further territorial or municipal obligation.

A similar entrapment occurs when American State Citizens are encouraged to vote in federal and federated state/county elections.  When they “register” to vote, they unknowingly give up their rights as stockholders and electors — an undisclosed loss — and they become “enfranchised” as presumed operators of federal corporation franchises.  This sleight-of-hand conversion of Americans from electors into mere voters again serves to mischaracterize them and defraud them and subject them and deprive them of their natural birth right and material interests at the hands of people who are in fact their employees.

As none of these losses and obligations are ever fully disclosed no valid private contract can be alleged and any American who subsequently rescinds a voter registration must be removed from all registration data bases and held harmless from any presumption of federal enfranchisement.

Let’s just use this one small example of the Big Lie federal employees have been told and that they have been enforcing upon others…..continuing from (1) quoting from Christopher Chapman now:

“§ 422.104. Who can be assigned a social security number.

(a) Persons eligible for SSN assignment. We can assign you a social security number if you meet the evidence requirements in § 422.107 and you are:

(1) A United States citizen; or

(2) An alien lawfully admitted to the United States….

Let’s examine the definition of United States (U.S.) used in Title 26 to see if average Americans who are not employed by the federal government are a citizens of the U.S…..

In most statutes (statute law) the Unites States referred to is federal territory, just as it is in Title 26—- i.e.:

26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions

(9) United States

The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes only the States and the District of Columbia.

(10) State —-The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.

The term “State” exposes the truth that term “United States” means the District of Columbia and no other.

Let us review, specifically the history of the evolution of this term

The code of Federal Regulation is very definitive by using the word “its”, in lieu of, “their”

Title 26 CFR § 1.1-1(a)(1) provides, in pertinent part:

(1) Section 1 of the [Internal Revenue] Code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States ….

(c) Who is a citizen. Every person born or naturalized in the United States and subject and subject to its [District of Columbia] jurisdiction is a citizen.

The 1939 Code through 1954 the definition of “State”:

IRC 1954:

Alaska is a U.S. Territory

Hawaii is a U.S. Territory

· 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the Territories and the District of Colombia, where such construction is necessary to carry out the provisions of this title.

Alaska joins the Union, strikeout “Territories” and substitute “Territory of Hawaii”:

Revision 1:

Alaska is a State of the Union

Hawaii is a U.S. Territory

7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the Territory of Hawaii and the District of Colombia, where such construction is necessary to carry out the provisions of this title.

Hawaii joins the Union, strikeout “the Territory of Hawaii and” immediately after the word “include”:

Revision 2

Alaska is a State of the Union

Hawaii is a State of the Union

· 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.

Notice how Alaska and Hawaii only fit these definitions of [Territorial] “State” before they were declared to be States of the United States of America, and now are hereby admitted into the Union on equal footing with the original States, in all respects whatsoever.[emphasis added]

Let’s examine some court cases that further solidifies this subject:

 

Before the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868:

A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing. To conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen of some one of the States, is totally foreign to the idea, and inconsistent with the proper construction and common understanding of the expression as used in the Constitution, which must be deduced from its various other provisions.  The object then to be attained, by the exercise of the power  of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective States. [Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)] [bold emphasis added]

It is true, every person, and every class and description of  persons, who were at the time of the adoption of the Constitution recognized as citizens in the several States, became also citizens of this new political body; but none other; it was formed by them, and for them and their posterity, but for no one else. And the personal rights and privileges guarantied [sic] to citizens of this new sovereignty were intended to embrace those only who were then members of the several state communities, or who should afterwards, by birthright or otherwise, become members, according to the provisions of the Constitution and the principles on which it was founded. [Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 404 (1856)]  [emphasis added]

… [F]or it is certain, that in the sense in which the word “Citizen” is used in the federal Constitution, “Citizen of each State,” and “Citizen of the United States***,” are convertible terms; they mean the same thing; for “the Citizens of each State are entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States,” and “Citizens of the United States***” are, of course, Citizens of all the United States***. [44 Maine 518 (1859), Hathaway, J. dissenting][italics in original, underlines & C’s added]

 As it was the adoption of the Constitution by the Conventions of nine States that established and created the United States***, it is obvious there could not then have existed any person who had been seven years a citizen of the United States***, or who possessed the Presidential qualifications of being thirty-five years of age, a natural born citizen, and fourteen years a resident of the United States***. The United States*** in these provisions, means the States united. To be twenty-five years of age, and for seven years to have been a citizen of one of the States which ratifies the Constitution, is the qualification of a representative. To be a natural borncitizen of one of the States which shall ratify the Constitution, or to be a citizen of one of said States at the time of such ratification, and to have attained the age of thirty-five years, and to have been fourteen years a resident within one of the said States, are the Presidential qualifications, according to the true meaning of the Constitution. [People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870)] [bold and underline emphasis added]
After the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868:
It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States** and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual. [Slaughter House Cases, 83 U.S. 36]   [(1873) emphasis added]
The first clause of the fourteenth amendment made negroes citizens of the United States**, and citizens of the State in which they reside, and thereby created two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and the other of the state. [Cory et al. v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327][(1874) headnote 8, emphasis added]
We have in our political system a Government of the United States** and a government of each of the several States.Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own ….[U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542] [(1875) emphasis added]

One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. Thomasson v. State, 15 Ind. 449; Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R. 738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis. 443. [McDonel v. State, 90 Ind. 320, 323][(1883) underlines added]

A person who is a citizen of the United States** is necessarily a citizen of the particular state in which he resides. But a person may be a citizen of a particular state and not a citizen of the United States**. To hold otherwise would be to deny to the state the highest exercise of its sovereignty, — the right to declare who are its citizens.[State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380]

[6 S. 602 (1889), emphasis added]

The first clause of the fourteenth amendment of the federal Constitution made negroes citizens of the United States**, and citizens of the state in which they reside, and thereby created two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and the other of the state.

[4 Dec. Dig. ’06, p. 1197, sec. 11]

[“Citizens” (1906), emphasis added]

There are, then, under our republican form of government,two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in a person, without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District of Columbia; but both classes usually exist in the same person.[Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala. 155]

[48 S. 788, 791 (1909), emphasis added]

There is a distinction between citizenship of the United States** and citizenship of a particular state, and a person may be the former without being the latter.

[Alla v. Kornfeld, 84 F.Supp. 823] [(1949) headnote 5, emphasis added]

A person may be a citizen of the United States** and yet be not identified or identifiable as a citizen of any particular state.[Du Vernay v. Ledbetter] [61 So.2d 573, emphasis added]

… citizens of the District of Columbia were not granted the privilege of litigating in the federal courts on the ground of diversity of citizenship. Possibly no better reason for this fact exists than such citizens were not thought of when the judiciary article [III] of the federal Constitution was drafted.  … citizens of the United States** … were also not thought of; but in any event a citizen of the United States**, who is not a citizen of any state, is not within the language of the [federal] Constitution.[Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914]  [emphasis added]

That there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a state, and the privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other is well established by the decisions of the courts of this country. [Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)]
No fortifying authority is necessary to sustain the proposition that in the United States a double citizenship exists. A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the Federal Government and at the same time a citizen of the State in which he resides.  Determination of what is qualified residence within a State is not here necessary. Suffice it to say that one possessing such double citizenship owes allegiance and is entitled to protection from each sovereign to whose jurisdiction he is subject.  [Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp. 383 (USDC/WDMO 1953)]
The privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates any of the Bill of Rights nor protects all rights of individual citizens. See Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1873).  Instead, this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship.
[Jones v. Temmer, 829 F.Supp. 1226 (USDC/DCO 1993)]”  unquote Christopher Chapman.

In conclusion….

Attacking Americans who are not obligated in any way to pay federal income taxes, and certainly not obligated to pay “municipal” taxes merely disguised more generally as “federal” taxes, is against the law, both statutory and Public.  Coercing exempt persons and/or denying their claim of exemption is a criminal act of extortionate racketeering and inland piracy.

There are American state nationals (people who live as non-federal, non-citizens) and American State Citizens (who occupy public offices of the land jurisdiction states).  These are distinctly different groups within one Body Politic which is foreign to the “United States” as defined in Title 26 and throughout Federal Code.

None of them are naturally liable to pay federal income taxes and none of them are subject to territorial or municipal law.  The sooner IRS employees become fully acquainted with these facts and the limitations of their powers and jurisdictions with respect to these Americans, the better for everyone involved.

These facts are unwritten by the most fundamental principles giving rise to the government of this country.  Please note the following:

The limited and exclusive power of legislation conferred on the Congress and the geographic authority of these powers is summed up by these controlling sections of the actual Constitution:

  • “power of personal and subject-matter legislation throughout the Union and upon the high seas at Art, I, § 8, cl. 1-16;
  • “power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation over (what will be) the District of Columbia at Art, I, § 8, cl. 17; and
  • “constructive (implied) power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation at Art. IV, § 3, cl. 2 in the form of ‘Rules and Regulations,’ id., ‘respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States,’ id., i.e., federal territories and enclaves.

Please note that the Constitution confers upon Congress no power of territorial legislation over any person or property anywhere in the Union.

Unless a person is naturally and/or truly voluntarily subject to the Territorial “United States” defined as the District of Columbia in Title 26, they cannot be subjected as a Municipal citizen, either; and Congress has no delegated legislative power allowing it to usurp its territorial or municipal authority upon the actual states and people otherwise.

Read that as—-no means no.  There’s a difference between consensual sex and rape.

When people born on the land of one of the actual organic states claim their non-territorial, non-municipal, non-citizen political status and give evidence of the same intention by issuing an Act of Expatriation from the presumption of Territorial citizenship, and the surrender of the Municipal PERSON issued to them back to the Secretary of the Treasury, and otherwise give Notice of their revocation of election to pay federal income taxes or to otherwise subject themselves and their assets to any territorial or municipal code, that decision must be respected and adhered to by all agents of the territorial and municipal government without question or exception.

You can tax actual federal territorial and municipal employees all you like.  You can tax political asylum seekers and immigrants. You can tax people who are knowingly and voluntarily officers and employees of federally chartered corporations.

What you cannot do is to blindly assume that the existence of a Social Security Number and Masterfile Account establishes any valid basis for presuming (1) the political status of any individual or (2) any basis for assuming and assessing federal tax liabilities or other merely presumed obligations.

This circumstance is the result of self-interested mismanagement of federal agencies and departments for several generations.  It derives from wholesale distribution of Social Security Numbers and accounts by the Social Security Administration without respect for the limitations imposed by the actual law and without full disclosure to applicants.  It derives from purposeful efforts of the Congress to receive income from Americans under false pretenses—the presumption that they are knowingly and willingly acting as “volunteer” Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marine Service.  Most of all, it results from widespread ignorance among Revenue Agents, federal program administrators, and the general public.

All federal employees, all federal Territorial and Municipal citizens, all federal program administrators and managers need to be fully cognizant of these facts and you are encouraged to share them with your staff, your domestic judicial officers, your family and your friends.

Federal service is meant to be an honorable occupation worthy of respect and support, but when it devolves to purposeful racketeering against the people this same service is meant to serve, prosecution and conflict is the inevitable result.

It is important for federal employees –especially revenue agents and federal territorial and municipal judicial officers— to realize that when they misapply the law and contribute to these self-interested confusions they are committing serious crimes of racketeering, unlawful conversion of assets, inland piracy, personage, and barratry against their employers and benefactors.  These international crimes against Americans have been promoted by the federal governmental services corporations under a pretense of war and wartime necessity.  It is therefore necessary to also address this claim.

The Territorial aka “Federal” Government was created in 1868 in the wake of what is misleadingly called the “American Civil War” upon the release of the so-called Federal Constitution. This document, the “Constitution of the United States of America” presents articles of incorporation for a corporation doing business as the “United States of America” cleverly disguised via similar names deceit to resemble the actual Constitution.

Please note that the actual constitution is: “The Constitution for the united States of America”, not “the Constitution of the United States of America”.  And both these documents are different from the municipal constitution called the “Constitution of the United States”.

This conflict, the so-called “Civil War” was in fact an illegal commercial mercenary conflict taking place on our shores.  It was never declared by any action of the united States of America in Congress Assembled, and it was never resolved by any peace treaty.  Instead, President Johnson declared peace on the land jurisdiction via three public declarations creating a binding contract mandating peace—once again underscoring the fact that this was a commercial mercenary action and no form of actual “war” at all.

Ever since then there has been no sovereign government invoked and no competent land jurisdiction Congress of the actual states of the Union has been convened.  As a result, all so-called “wars” have instead been commercial mercenary actions carried out by corporations and/or internal domestic police actions.

Read that as: Congress has no “war powers”.  “War” has specific requirements and definitions under international law, and twist and turn as they might, the members of Congress— as that body has operated since 1860 —cannot declare actual war or take refuge in any claim of war powers or any doctrine of necessity with respect to the actual states and people of the Union.  What began as a fraudulent and illegal commercial mercenary action remains a fraudulent and illegal commercial mercenary action subject to prosecution as fraud.

It should surprise nobody that the actions of Congress seeking to enrich itself and to usurp against the lawful government of the actual United States by bolstering its territorial hegemony and deceptively terming it the [territorial] “United States” as seen in Title 26, is conceived in fraud and word-smithing and similar names deceits going back six generations.

All Territorial (States of States) and Municipal (STATES OF STATES) are merely franchises of self-interested federal commercial corporations.  They have no vested authority related to the American states and people and have fraudulently usurped upon the jurisdiction and property assets of their employers.

Without the ability to engage in actual war these various commercial corporations have rampaged around under false pretenses and have criminally trespassed on the Americans they are supposed to provide with “essential government services”.  They have also caused a great deal of trouble throughout the rest of the world.

As federal employees and as citizens of the Territorial and Municipal “United States” it is very important for you to become fully aware of the limitations of your position of limited delegated authority and the substantially unfavorable circumstances created by these past actions, events, and public policies espoused by these various incorporated entities.

You should also know that there is no “state” immunity available to invoke as protection against your actions as employees of commercial corporations and in most cases, your offices are not properly insured or bonded.  The sovereign government of this country is vested entirely in the American people and their jural assemblies at both the county and state levels.  Their states are the only ones enjoying sovereign immunity.

This Public Notice is provided in the interest of avoiding unnecessary conflicts between Americans and their federal employees.

All legal presumptions regarding political status based on the existence of Social Security Numbers and Masterfile Accounts are being based on insupportable evidences obtained under conditions of non-disclosure and semantic deceit and implemented via the purposeful World War II Victory Tax circumvention of the actual law pertaining to the issuance of Social Security Numbers.

Such presumptions of federal territorial or federal municipal citizenship cannot be maintained in the face of direct objection and reasonable proof of revocation by American state nationals and American State Citizens.

Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents

The American States and People
c/o 1336 Staubbach Circle
Anchorage, Alaska 99508

EINs for the United States, Inc and Child Corporations

These are the EINS of the various Governmental Services Organizations.  This shows that every aspect of the criminal UNITED STATES slavery system is its own corporate entity.

Governmental EINs:

Amazingly, we find that the “United States” has incorporated multiple times, that the Whitehouse, House of Representatives, Congress, and Judiciary are all separate CORPORATIONS with their own EINs, and that the Treasury from 1789 is not the same as the current Treasury.

-E PLURIBUS UNUM- THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:  AG 59880464 A   (the only non-EIN, found via U.C.C. Filed Documents)
UNITED STATES, INC.:  52-1943749
UNITED STATES:  52-2283179
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:  52-1259974
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:  72-0564834
WHITE HOUSE:  52-1413575
WHITE HOUSE ART GALLERY:  52-0799067
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES US:  23-7358951
HOUSE DC INC:  30-0117990   (This is the House of Representatives for the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION)
SENATE UNITED STATES:  52-1085802
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT COURTS US:  52-2283179
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT COURTS US:  23-7420574
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE:  53-0205205
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY:  54-9139651
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 1789:  54-9139651

NATIONAL INISTITUTE FOR HEALTH:  52-2102558
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY:  56-2634924
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF NAVY:  54-6140537
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF NAVY:  54-1717223
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF NAVY:  52-1767199
UNITED STATES SPACE FOUNDATION:  31-1653556
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE:  53-0056498
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE:  52-2080384
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE:  53-0196642
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE:  52-1313593
UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY:  05-1332630
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD:  23-7420063
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE:  52-2200788
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE:  65-0200168
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION:  53-6009326
GENERAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATORS[, INC.]:  59-3686238
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE:  52-6037440
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION:  26-2750394

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION:  91-2021627
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION:  52-1582182
CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL:  04-3797580
UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE:  52-1503251
UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE:  52-0886646

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE:  52-1535613
FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY, INC. AKA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES:  04-2527432

Only Kentucky, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Northern Mariana Islands, and Puerto Rico are actual Commonwealths in the United States, Inc.  The others, such as New Jersey and Florida, are not supposed to be Commonwealths and require more investigation.

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA:  13-3171852  (Why is a foreign country a Commonwealth Incorporated through the US via EIN?)
COMMONWEALTH OF AMERICA:  59-3197049
COMMONWEALTH OF DELRAY INC:  38-6068927
COMMONWEALTH OF FLORIDA INC:  00-0000000  [unlisted]
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY:  61-1257717
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY:  61-0600439
COMMONWEALTH OF LATIN AMERICA INC:  04-3163688
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS:  04-2783194
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS:  04-3186063
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS:  04-6002284
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE:  04-3476924
COMMONWEALTH OF NEW JERSEY INC:  22-2560971
COMMONWEALTH OF NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS:  98-6019463
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO:  13-6002941

The Federal Reserve System EINs:

FEDERAL RESERVE, INC. [FRISCO, TX]:  80-0153784
FEDERAL RESERVE HOLDINGS, LLC [NAPLES, FL]:  27-0786194
FEDERAL RESERVE CLUB OF NY:  13-6127548
FEDERAL RESERVE ASSOCIATION OF FITE & CO. HOLDINGS [DC]:  90-6198337

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO:  94-1160748
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA:  58-0561269
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF BOSTON:  04-2111360
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK [BOSTON, MA]:  04-2854387
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF BOSTON:  04-3254861
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK [WINDSOR LOCKS CT]:  20-0342029
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS:  75-0793101
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF HOUSTON:  52-2117007
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CLEVELAND:  36-2195077
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CLEVELAND:  34-0715730
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY:  44-0545874
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND [VA]:  54-0516007
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS:  41-0696292
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA:  23-1357092
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST LOUIS [MO]:  43-0658373
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DETROIT:  38-1358845
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK [LOUISVILLE,  KY]:  61-0449595
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK [LITTLE ROCK, AR]: 71-0239730

 

Largest Legal Firms & BARs EINs operating the Unconstitutional Slavery System:

Bar Associations are owned and operated by Northern Trust.

BAKER AND MCKENZIE LLP:  36-2137456
BAKER AND MCKENZIE FOUNDATION
:  51-0200280
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP:  95-2018373
REED SMITH LLP:  25-0749630
SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM PLLC:  13-1777230
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA INC:  94-3104546
INDIANA BAR FOUNDATION:  35-6032377
STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN:  38-6006823
STATE BAR OF TEXAS:  74-6000148
FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION:  53-0182821

Corporate Operaters EINs:

DTCC is the warehouse for most Birth Certificates.  Travelers is a primary insurance group providing PUBLIC OFFICIAL BONDS for many (if not most) [INCORPORATED] COUNTIES across the UNITED STATES.  The Food companies are listed because they conspire with Monsanto to ensure food across the UNITED STATES, INC is laden with Genetically Modified Organisms (rather than actual food), toxic chemicals, additives, MSG, fluoride, etc.

THE DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION:  22-3725387
DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORPORATION:  13-4086405
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC:  13-2592361
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC:  13-4019460
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.:  13-2624428
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION:  13-2614959
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION:  56-0906609
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION:  54-1719854
CITIGROUP INC:  52-1568099
HSBC USA INC:  13-2764867
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC:  25-1435979
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK (TD):  13-5640479
US BANCORP:  41-0255900
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY:  41-0449260
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION:  52-1000130
AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE ASSOCIATION:  52-2062833
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION:  52-1001304
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION:  20-0161441
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION:  32-0016144
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION:  59-2626656
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION:  36-1897980

TRAVELERS INSURANCE:  23-2643432
TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO:  23-6250429
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY RETIREES CLUB:  06-0961177
TRAVELERS INSURANCE AGENCY:  87-0271332
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY:  23-1624911
TRAVELERS INSURANCE GROUP HOLDINGS INC:  06-1445591
TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO:  06-0566090
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANIES CLAIMS SERVICE:  06-1286274
TRAVELERS INSURANCE:  35-1838079
TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO:  41-0518860

MONSANTO COMPANY:  43-1878297
GENERAL MILLS INC
:  41-0274440
KRAFT [HEINZ] FOOD INC:  52-2284372
PEPSICO INC:  13-1584302
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY:  38-1285128
AT&T INC:  43-1301883

International Organizations EINs:

These people print debt out of nothing then call it “money” by semantic deception.  See: Confessions of an Economic Hitman.

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND:  91-9979482
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND:  52-1323228
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, INC.:  59-3283287
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY CORPORATION:  20-3347968
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FOREX, INC.:  20-464896
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY GROUP, INC.:  65-0784597

Secret Societies & Cults EINs:  (not so secret)

Many upper echelon politicians, attorneys, bankers, and elite are members of these organizations.  John Kerry, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush are known Skull and Bones Members.  Scientology members sign BILLION YEAR contracts.

SKULL & BONES, INC:  20-5047509
SKULL & CROSSBONES LLC: 20-4659899
SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INC: 52-1144999
SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION SOUTHERN JURISDICTION USA INC:  52-6054737
SCOTTISH RITE RESEARCH SOCIETY:  52-1737035
SCOTTISH RITE TEMPLE:  52-0027293
ROSICRUCIAN CENTER TUCSON:  23-7047513
ROSICRUCIAN FELLOWSHIP PASADENA CENTER:  95-3752756
ROSICRUCIAN FELLOWSHIP LAS VEGAS: 88-0175543
ROSICRUCIAN FELLOWSHIP: 95-1855670
ROSICRUCIAN ORDER LA LOD:  95-6134231
ROSICRUCIAN ORDER:  94-1156620
ROSICRUCIAN ORDER:  02-0690772
ROSICRUCIAN ORDER OF THE HERMETIC GOLD AND ROSE CROSS:  68-0664246
ROSICRUCIAN ORDER AMORC:  04-6054361
ROSICRUCIAN ORDER:  75-2862663
ROSICRUCIAN ORDER AMORC:  93-1210115
ROSICRUCIAN (AMORC) TEMPLE OF BOSTON INC., THE:  04-6054361

SCIENTOLOGY & DIANETICS CHURCH:  84-1243498
SCIENTOLOGY MISSION OF BOULDER:  84-0700610
SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL RESERVES TR:  98-6041576
SCIENTOLOGY MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL:  95-3739098
SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF ORLANDO:  59-2153243
SCIENTOLOGY ORLANDO, INC.:  59-1493679
SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF SACRAMENTO:  94-2274298
SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF BATON ROUGE:  72-1104649
SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH OF NEW HAVEN:  06-1077361
SCIENTOLOGY BOOKSTORE:  38-6087810
SCIENTOLOGY DIANETICS OF NEW JERSEY:  36-4349863

Lawful suit upon US Department of Justice to answer questions about fraudulent nature of IRS

WAKE UP!!!

Thanks to David Johnson:

I.R.S. is an agency of the Zionist Rothschild CROWN/VATICAN/SWISS Banking Cabal. It was set up in 1913 to tax/burden all U.S. corporations, to run up debt by design, and to enslave anyone stupid enough to think that they’re a U.S. citizen. If you pay “income” taxes on your pay for labor, you are a 10, on the 1-10 scale, dumb. The very top pinned post on this page explains your way out. If you have not watched and used that video, run to the mirror to look at the problem. WATCH THE VIDEO!!!! FRNs are MILITARY SCRIP for P.O.W./Enemies of the State/U.S. citizen/U.S. Government Employees.

Document No. 201-06182015-1

This printed side represents consideration to/of both public and private sides in things Lawful/Legal.

Without Prejudice :David-Lee: Buess. Non-Corporation Private Attorney General
Crime Victim, Corpus Delicti
~22014 Delaware Township Road 184
~Arlington, Ohio ~45814-9998
Phone: 419 694 5796

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20500

Madam Attorney General:

Problem 1
There is a conflict as to rule of law for all in forma pauperis filings and paperwork. The paperwork does not reflect the Key Case ruling of the United States Supreme Court re the Definition of “income” (1913) Stratton Indep. v. Howbert 231 U.S. 399 …the gain arrived from Capital, from labor or from both combined, provided it includes profit gained from the sale of a capital asset. This for all Tax legislation and IRC CODE and U.S. Code.

Problem 2
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act 3500 – 3520 Specifically 3512 Public Protection the in forma pauperis paperwork does not contain a valid OMB number and the court is not informing the plaintiff(s) that they are not under obligation to fill out the paperwork. These documents are fraud by trickery to get the plaintiff/defendants to admit to having “income” not lawfully defined in any of these documents: 1) INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
U. S. CODE 3) all in forma pauperis forms 4) INTERNAL REVENUE TAX forms.

Problem 3
The rules of the court are not written in simple English and are using “Latin” or some other terminology I do not understand. The first rule of law is “any law written which is not fully understandable by the reader is void for vagueness. Thus applying to the rules of Court.

Problem 4
Nowhere in the rules of court is there mention of the right of a Private Attorney General to file proceedings in this court, aka, closed shop In violation of the Taft Hartley Act on Monopolies. The rules therefore only apply to the B.A.R.

Problem 5
There are some 60 Key Case rulings by the High Court that are not found in the IRS CODE nor U.S. Code which relate to tax law– shall we say intentional fraud. Who’s job is it to see that once the Court has ruled that ruling is immediately placed in the tax laws? In my opinion that would fall to the office of the Clerk of Court.

Problem 6
In 1935 the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE was ruled un-constitutional by the Supreme Court whereas prohibition had been repealed. U.S. v. Constantine 296 U.S. 287 thus have no subject matter jurisdiction within these union States now 50. See 26 IRC § 6331 (A) Authority of the Secretary. Any supposed jurisdiction could only fall within the Federal Zone, U.S. Citizens, Washington, District of Columbia, New York City, NY and the holding territories belonging to the United States, ie, Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau. No person, in a union State, can be forced into a false citizenship whereas he/she is a lawful resident of a union State. Voter registration and other government web sites only ask are you a U.S. Citizen – why – fraud by trickery.Compared to what? African American, American National, Lawful American Citizen-see Constitution, Native American, et al. The authority of the Secretary, 26 IRC 6331(A), therefore only applies to the Federal Zone and not the union States 50 and their domicilees.

Problem 7
The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al.~ CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.) Note Added: A collections agency out of Puerto Rico operating under French Law; AKA Foreign Agents – CORRECT? This now falls under criminal law – government imposters. The Treaty of 1213 does not apply to these union states now 50 nor to the 1778 ratified Constitution for the United States of America. Every law written by Congress for these union States must be Constitutional – ab inito thereof.

Problem 8
Produce [DAVID L BUESS],[DAVID LEE BUESS], [SIR DAVID-LEE DBA]=STRAW MAN, TRADE NAME, CORPORATION, COMPANY. Identity theft fraud scheme relating to Certificate of Live Birth and BIRTH CERTIFICATE, enslavement, and a $1,000,000.00 Bond. Fraud by trickery is still intentional fraud.

The IMF have now forced the Assignment of a Social Security number upon every new born child. This may well be so as to provide accurate information for census however it is unconstitutional for that organization to use a Social Security number to spy and collect financial information upon any living man, woman or child and then report that information to the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE/IMF. This unlawful gathering of undefined “income” is now causing mass tax fraud in America. Get your acts together.

Problem 9
Arrest warrants have been issued to the HANCOCK COUNTY OHIO SHERIFF MIKE HELDMAN by me and to the Clerk of the Court KATHY PROSSER WILCOX for all IRS agents within these union States for tax fraud. This warrant was in accordance to law signed by 3 Notary Public which equal a judge. I highly recommend your office issue an immediate arrest warrant for these entities for obstruction of justice in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1001.

Problem 10
Criminal Complaints filed with the U.S. Attorney’s Office 555 4th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20530 are being intentionally ignored – obstruction of justice: 18 U.S. C. 1001. These warrants were filed in Admiralty now un-rebutted.

Problem 11
Conflict: The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is entitled to free access to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State in the Union (2 Black 620, see also Crandell v. Nevada, 6 Wall 35. Plaintiff should not be charged fees, or costs for the lawful and constitutional right to petition this court in this matter in which he is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of the State and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief. Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43].
[DAVID L BUESS]=FICTION David-Lee: Buess. =natural individual – get it? Now the Courts are demanding filing fees? In forma pauperis? Refuse to allow cases to be filed into their courts under FRCP Rule 55(1) Default as in my cases. Thrown out because I refused to pay the fees in accordance to this ruling of the court and the in forma pauperis paperwork had no OMB numbers nor the lawful definition of “income”.

(1920) Eisner v. Mcomber 252 U.S. 189, 206 “Congress cannot by any definition it may adopt conclude what income is, since it by legislation cannot alter the Constitution from which it derives it’s power to legislate and within who’s limitations alone that power can be lawfully exercised.” Now what Jackass is defining income? The Center on Foreign Relations?

Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103:..wages are not income within the meaning of the income tax amendment to the Constitution, or any other provision of the Constitution.

Problem 12
Care to explain this tax fraud scheme? J16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd Ed. Section 177:
The “Trade or Business” Scam -shows how I.R.C. Subtitle A is a tax primarily upon “public offices”, which ~26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26) calls a “trade or business”
• PDF Why Your Government is Either a Thief or you are a “Public Officer” for Income Tax Purposes, Form ~#05.008 (OFFSITE LINK)- SEDM Forms page
• PDF Why Statutory Civil Law is Law for Government and Not Private Persons, Form ~#05.037 (OFFSITE LINK)- SEDM Forms page
• PDF De Facto Government Scam, Form ~#05.043 (OFFSITE LINK)- SEDM Forms page. Proof that we don’t have a government anymore, but simply a huge corporation in which “citizens” are really just “employees” and officers of a corporation. This arrangement is called a “de facto government” and a “sham trust” instead of a public trust. (CLEARFIELD DOCTRINE AND TREASON AGAINST THE 1776 CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THEREOF)
• PDF Resignation of Compelled Social Security Trustee -how to abandon your job as a federal “employee” or “contractor”
• PDF State Income Taxes, Form ~#05.031 (OFFSITE LINK) -SEDM Forms page. Explains how all state income taxes are based on the Buck Act, which is a tax upon federal “public officials” and employees
Cites By Topic: “public office” •Proof that I.R.C. Subtitle A is a Federal Employee Kickback and not a “Tax”
Great IRS Hoax, section 5.6.10 entitled “The Federal Employee Kickback Position”
Public Salary Tax Act of 1939-foundation of the modern income tax
Buck Act of ~1940, 4 U.S.C. Chapter ~4 (OFFSITE LINK) – federal government consents to state taxation of its “public officials” on federal territory. All state income taxes are based on this act.
Income tax ruled unconstitutional by the USSC in 1895 and not shown to be overturned. 16th Amendment XVI was never ratified and there are 17,000 certified documents to prove it taken from state and federal archives. U.S.v.Bill Benson. Congress refused to amend this to VOID – intentional fraud.
I demand that All Truth(s) be self evident, the response to this instrument be in writing by obligation. You have only 20-days to respond whereas 28 U.S.C. §3002 Definition 15) United States means A) A Federal Corporation.
With clean hands, I come in peace.
Disclaimer on file.
Autograph: _______________________________________
David-Lee: Buess. Non-corporation, P.A.G.

Notice of Service: On this the 18th day of June 2015 this document was sent 1st class mail United States Post Office to the U.S. Attorney General.