U.S. Public Servant Questionnaire: First Line of Defense against unlawful Police

Every time a Police Officer talks, they are speaking through their LEGAL [fictional] ARTIFICIAL PERSON CORPORATION ENTITY construct.

When they ask for a name, that name is AUTOMATICALLY legalized into its UPPER CASE representation.

Police do NOT tell us that every time they talk to anyone, the “person” they talk to is already under suspicion BY LAW.  Such full terms and conditions are required to be disclosed by the TRUTH IN LENDING ACT -where the insurance franchise they are assuming exists is debt loaned into existence from nothing and thus covered by the TRUTH IN LENDING ACT-.

By Law, every time a Corporate AGENT/OFFICER speaks, they are to treat the human being as if they are GUILTY until PROVEN INNOCENT, by way of the still enforced LIEBER CODE, along with the TRADING IN THE ENEMY ACT, makes all human beings enemies of the Corporate “State“!

With this in mind, every time a Corporate POLICY ENFORCER opens their mouth, they are to automatically treat the human as a legal fictional criminal.  Indeed, just stopping someone in their policy enforcement car automatically puts the “driver” under administrative arrest.  They are required to say the Miranda Warning first thing when talking to a “driver,” yet most policy enforcers break these codes EVERY TIME.

In the STATE OF MICHIGAN, their APPLICATION FOR DRIVER’S LICENSE claim as legal language above the signature, “I certify under the penalty for perjury that I am a legal Michigan resident, the statements made on this application are true, and that a court is not holding my license.”  the first two “I”s refer to the human being, then the human is “fit” into a “legal Michigan resident” which is the “legal presence artificial ‘person’ corporation trust trade-name insurance franchise” that is corporate property owned by the STATE.

This legal language makes claiming to be a human over a “corporation” a felony crime..  just for having a Driver’s License.  This is what clergy would call “Original Sin.”  It is the first commission of a crime by temptation and suggestion.  The simple idea that a human being “needs” a Driver’s License to “Drive” is Neuro-Linguistic Programming, start to finish, birth to death within the LEGAL SOCIETY of ARTIFICIAL PERSONS.  The Right to Travel is independent, immutable, inviolatable, and may be used with IMPUNITY (total disregard for the violence that criminal mistrained corporate policy enforcers, as it is the violence that is the crime).

Policy Enforcement AGENTS depend upon this original commission of claiming to be NON-HUMAN to treat us as just that.

By way of WITH PREJUDICE, every officer may simply ASSUME (especially by POWER OF ASSUMPTION!!!) that these unlawful adhesion contracts exist and may be acted upon even if it is NOT true!

With that, the first line of defense is to have the PUBLIC SERVANT fill out the following questionnaire before they even open their mouth (but after they have placed your artificial person under administrative arrest by talking to “it”).

This form presents the PUBLIC SERVANT with the knowledge that the “person” they are talking to is the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, and not the ARTIFICIAL PERSON representing the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

This form was originally given to me and then edited for AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE information; as that is one of the most authoritative positions to be in according to statutory code.  U.C.C. Article 3 §3-402 (b) (1) clearly indicates that the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE cannot be held accountable for the debts of the ARTIFICIAL PERSON!

Print this form out and use it any time a POLICY ENFORCER attempts to engage with you as an ARTIFICIAL PERSON.

Public Servant Questionnaire PDF

Instructions for Use

Print this form out and Carry this with you at all times.  Present it to any PUBLIC SERVANT who decides to get cheeky with their job and fictional “authority.”

Have this ready whenever they talk to you.  When they approach, give the form to them and say, “YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED.”

Refuse to answer any questions until it is filled out.  just say and repeat: “I don’t answer any questions.  Please fill the form out.”

DO NOT FOLLOW ANY ORDERS, as the orders do not have any authority nor standing until such authority/standing is PROVEN by a completed questionnaire.  It is recommended that we force policy enforcers to act in violent, combative, and belligerent ways rather than just comply with their unlawful orders.  (all orders by policy enforcers are unlawful, especially in light of the WRIT MANDAMUS issued at the COMMON LAW preventing all COLOR OF LAW actions.)

This is just one of many real-time solutions for dealing with unlawful POLICY ENFORCERS…  which is all of them.

This form works for non-legal human beings, assumed artificial persons (which is the primary job of policy enforcers), and World Citizens.

Study: Police-Inflicted Injuries Send More than 50,000 to Emergency Rooms EVERY YEAR

Study: Police-Inflicted Injuries Send More than 50,000 to Emergency Rooms EVERY YEAR

police brutality

A new study published by JAMA Surgery found that from 2006 to 2012, there were approximately 51,000 emergency department visits per year for patients injured by [legal corporation] enforcement in the United States, with this number stable over this time period.

From the press release:

During this time period, there were 355,677 ED visits for injuries by law enforcement, and frequencies did not increase over time. Of these visits, 0.3 percent (n = 1,202) resulted in death. More than 80 percent of patients were men, and the average age of patients was 32 years. Most lived in zip codes with median household income less than the national average, and 81 percent lived in urban areas. Injuries by law enforcement were more common in the South and West and less common in the Northeast and Midwest. Most injuries by law enforcement resulted from being struck, with gunshot and stab wounds accounting for fewer than seven percent. Most injuries were minor. Medically identified substance abuse was common in patients injured by police, as was mental illness.

The most common cause of injury was “being struck by or against” which accounted for approximately 77 percent of the ER visits.

Lead study author Dr. Elinore Kaufman, a surgical resident at New York-Presbyterian Hospital Weill Cornell Medical Center in New York City, told Live Science that mental illness was common, affecting 20 percent of people injured. She added that the study’s estimate of 51,000 emergency room visits per year does not include deaths that occur at crime scenes or people who are injured but do not seek medical attention.

Of the findings, the study authors wrote,

While public attention has surged in recent years, we found these frequencies [approximately 51,000 ED visits per year] to be stable over 7 years, indicating that this has been a longer-term phenomenon.

While it is impossible to classify how many of these injuries are avoidable, these data can serve as a baseline to evaluate the outcomes of national and regional efforts to reduce law enforcement-related injury.

According to The Counted, a database maintained by The Guardian, 1,146 people were killed by police in the US in 2015, and 1,092 lost their lives to law enforcement in 2016.

The Washington Post maintains a database called Fatal Force that tracks police shootings. So far in 2017, according to the database, 295 people have been fatally shot by police in the US.

A website called Killed By Police lists people who have been killed by police by all means, including gunshot, taser, restraint/physical force, chemical, vehicle, and “other.” The site is updated regularly, and as of the time of this writing, 343 deaths by law enforcement are documented.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

Contributed by Lily Dane of The Daily Sheeple.

Lily Dane is a staff writer for The Daily Sheeple. Her goal is to help people to “Wake the Flock Up!”

Save The People… Read The Sheeple!

Join over one million free thinkers who read our newsletter monthly. Stay up to date with breaking news, trending videos and important information sent to you a few times a week.

TED Talk: Trevor Aaronson: How this FBI strategy is actually creating US-based terrorists

These Policy Enforcers are CRIMINALS for creating crimes where there is NO CRIME.

As a reminder, creating criminals is a violation of law on many levels.  The fact that this video exists exposes that the FBI is NOT who or what they say they are.

Funding terrorists is against the statutory corporate code, yet the FBI funding terrorists.  There are statutory codes that make funding terrorists is a crime.  How is the FBI and their “individual agents” exempt from terrorist laws?   Is it that they enforce terrorism laws so thus obviously they are permitted to engage in such funding of terrorism to “catch the terrorists”?

Well, if we assume that “taxes” actually go to the government -which President Ronald Reagan commissioned the Grace Commission Report proved that it is 100% of all tax revenue is syphoned off before reaching any “government function”- then taxes that fund the FBI is a crime as the FBI fund terrorists… literally.   It is a crime to pay any portion of taxes to a government that supports the FBI due to the FBI’s creation of terrorism.

The only issue is that the UNITED STATES, INC has basically redefined “terrorism” as violence that any “person” and/or “state” engages in to sway government function (and even policy!) with the exception of the UNITED STATES.  The United States exempts themselves from being terrorists because they are the worst offenders of “state terrorism.”

The “state terrorism” has gotten so bad in the UNITED STATES, INC that citizens and non-citizens are not allowed to own private property, nor exercise any right to travel, nor expatriate…  each of these being basic human rights DEFINED by the UNITED NATIONS (INC).

All rights are seen as benefits by the AGENTS and OFFICERS of and in the UNITED STATES, INCORPORATED.

Study Shows Police Crime is Rampant — 3 Cops Arrested a Day, Over 1,100 Every Year

This would be why the general population is seriously upset with CORPORATE POLICY ENFORCERS.

A STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY Corporate Policy Enforcers stole this author’s private property automobile over a year ago and yet the Sheriff and co-conspirators continue committing their crimes.   There are no policy enforcers for the policy enforcers.  The legal fiction judges simply re-enforce policy enforcers delusional beliefs because the judges are attempting to defer their own HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS/CRIMES.

Study Shows Police Crime is Rampant — 3 Cops Arrested a Day, Over 1,100 Every Year

 June 23, 2016

… our data directly contradicts some of the prevailing assumptions and the proposition that only a small group of rotten apples perpetrate the vast majority of police crime.

A new study tracking criminal activity perpetrated by police found, on average, three law enforcement officers are arrested each day — around 1,100 cops every year — and, more pointedly, this is not the case of a few rotten apples.

“The most common crimes were simple assault, drunken driving and aggravated assault, and significant numbers of sex crimes were also found. About 72 percent of officers charged are convicted, more than 40 percent of the crimes are committed on duty, and nearly 95 percent of the officers charged are men,” the Washington Post summarized.

Researchers from Bowling Green State University received funding from the Department of Justice for the study, aptly titled “Police Integrity Lost: A Study of Law Enforcement Officers Arrested.”

Analyzing data from 2005 through 2011, researchers sought to provide “guidance” in three areas, as the report explains:

“First, the study provides agencies information on the types of crime that are most frequently perpetrated by police officers. Second, the research provides information on the relationship between police crimes and other types of behavior that collectively comprise the problem officer. Third, nationwide data on police crimes and the manner in which arrested officers are organizationally sanctioned provides points of comparison for law enforcement agencies that confront these problems, as well as information on the degree to which law enforcement agencies tend to sanction or ignore certain crimes committed by officers.”

As study authors note, similar to the lack of a national reporting requirement for killings by police, no database currently exists to aggregate national statistics about any criminal activity by law enforcement officers.

During the period studied, researchers analyzed over 6,700 crimes, including a number of officers with multiple offenses. About 60 percent of the police crime was carried out while the officer was “technically” off-duty, but often employed the cloak of authority — such as producing a badge or service weapon — to commit the offense.

Though the crime rate among police is markedly lower than in the civilian population — 1.7 arrests of state and local police per 100,000 versus 3,888 per 100,000 among civilians — the research shattered some long-held myths about policing in the United States.

For starters, wrote study lead researcher, Philip M. Stinson, “police crimes are not uncommon.”

And though “only a small percentage of the total number of law enforcement officers will ever be arrested for a criminal offense … our data directly contradicts some of the prevailing assumptions and the proposition that only a small group of rotten apples perpetrate the vast majority of police crime.”

In fact, the report continues, “The assumption that only a small group of rogue officers perpetrate crimes … presumably stems from traditional notions and public expectations regarding the straight-laced, law-abiding police persona. In contrast, our method provided for the identification of an unprecedented number of police crimes that occurred within virtually every sort of place […] The data demonstrate that police crimes are not isolated events, and that hundreds of police officers every year get arrested for crimes including assault, rape, robbery, and murder across the United States.”

Several findings should sound the alarm for the public to snap out of its idolization of police — particularly in the area of sex crimes committed by cops. Nearly half of all sex crimes perpetrated by cops were committed against underage victims — children — though police convicted in those cases were 2.8 times more likely to lose their jobs.

Of the most egregious sex crimes perpetrated by officers, there “were a total of 422 forcible and statutory rapes, 352 cases of forcible fondling, and 94 sodomy cases. The proportion of cases that involved sexual violence and the most serious kinds of sex-related offenses was larger than expected.”

Indeed, “the sheer number of egregious cases constitutes prima facie evidence that these are not isolated events,” thus need closer scrutiny and further examination.

Previous studies about criminal activity among cops, the authors note, could have been particularly skewed through generalizations of language and scope — i.e., lumping assorted crimes under the heading “misconduct,” rather than specific topics like rape or theft.

Researchers urged further detailed study of police violence with an eye for understanding how police culture and socialization might influence the acceptability or normalization of criminal activity among cops.

In a summary conclusion, researchers surmised implementing specific measures could alleviate police criminal activity to rein in the apparently sizable problem.

It is also important to note that police employ a code of silence. Unlike the civilian population, police officers can cover for each other by investigating themselves. As we’ve pointed out in the past, police will protect even the vilest officers within their ranks as not to violate the blue code of silence. What’s more, those good officers who attempt to point out criminal behavior within their own departments are often met with ridicule, demotions, job loss, death threats, or worse.

Departments would be well-served by written policies for mandatory disclosure when an officer is arrested, compulsory annual criminal background checks of all sworn officers, documented and standardized procedures concerning officer discipline following an arrest, and tracking officer stress indicators to provide early assistance when necessary.

At last, the mythic and impenetrable illusion of a few bad apple cops has been shredded — whether the research will be taken to heart by departments across the U.S. is yet to be seen.

Cops vs Humanity: Comply or Die

Compliance is no longer enough to “be safe” when interacting with legal fictional CORPORATE POLICY ENFORCERS.  They take their job of  BEING THREATENED and KILLING PEOPLE (aka: an egocentric projection of the policy enforcers threatening everyone around them, including those who comply).  Some Policy Enforcers stole this author’s private property automobile…  They are a direct threat to capitalism if they refuse to protect/enforce/allow private property by stealing all private property (by legalizing it, under color of law [1873] /statutory code [1933/1938]/marshal law-Leiber Code [1863])

When compliance itself could mean death, what authority do these policy enforcers have?  Who investigates and puts policy enforcers on trial?  The Government has a vested interest in ALLOWING maximal abuse upon its citizenry (which is actually literal slavery, maybe with extra steps).  There is no “self-defense” allowed against policy enforcers whom are mere DEBT COLLECTORS for a criminal and corrupt legal system of the UNITED STATES, INC…  who operate the governmental services corporation slavery system.  Furthermore, it has become increasingly enforced as illegal to expose any illegal behavior of a “governmental services corporation agent/official.”  The governmental agencies refuse to look into any criminal actions as finding any would harm the image of authority, and there is so much!

If both non-compliance and compliance could be death, then how about we get back to basic human rights?  Such as the right to private property?

These policy enforcers “feeling threatened” and killing has an root presumption: The State owns our physical body.  This is technically true- if we attach to their insurance franchise system by having a STATE/NATION issued Birth Certificate, Driver’s License, Social Security, Passport, Voter ID Card, etc, then the physical body is pledged as SURETY for the ARTIFICIAL PERSON-TRADE NAME.  The signature is -by default- WITH PREJUDICE that allows the Corporation pretending to be a GOVERNMENT to apply any and all rules in any ways they see fit regardless of “justice,” “reason,” “evidence,” “fairness,” and “democracy.”  Our signature on these State Issued IDs -which are the artificial person- enables an illegal “invisible” adhesion contract with you AS THAT Artificial Person Corporate Insurance Franchise.  By having an illegal adhesion contract, the Physical Body goes from private property to personal property.  Private property is owned by the human-consciousness-entity without anyone/anything in between.  Personal property is owned by the Governmental Services Corporation (GSC) and only represents ownership, as it is the legal presence artificial person that “owns” the property, and the GSC owns the artificial person corporation.

To see how institutionalize the requirement to sign the way THEY need the signature to be (“with prejudice”), many United States STATE Corporations and the Social Security Administration will reject all applications for “Social Security”/”Driver’s License Identity”/etc if the application is signed “WITHOUT PREJUDICE (U.C.C. 1-308.)”  It is specific explicit policy/regulation to reject applications containing “Without Prejudice” above the signature.

The nature of the signature is important.  The Governmental Services Corporation itself RECOGNIZES the significance, nature, qualities of different kinds of signatures and “statements” around the signature.

Knowledge is power.  By signing documents “without prejudice” it is a small step in receiving our power back.  Legal is no longer an option.  Most American commit 3 felonies a day!  Illegal is also not an option as the criminalization of the entire population “allows” a governmental services corporation to commit heinous crimes upon their population.  And it has already happened!  All American Nationals are Enemies of the State for using a foreign private “bank currency” called FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

Cops Record Themselves Fabricating Charges with Victim’s Camera

NOTE: Policy Enforcers across the UNITED STATES, INC fabricate charges in most instances as there is no victim/no hurt party.  The Policy Enforcers unlawfully create criminals by claiming the STATE has been hurt when the STATE is a non-corporeal “corporation” that cannot actually be harmed.  It is a crime for policy enforcers to victimize people when the people have harmed no one:  Common Law states that there must be an injured party…  and Cops’ egos and propensity for violence are not defensible as “injured” for creating crimes where none exist.

One of the most common fabricated charges is assault.  If anyone simply TOUCHES a policy enforcer, that is assault.  The issue is that this goes 180  degrees as well, meaning that if they TOUCH us, that is assault.  Officers assault human beings all the time and get away with it.  Indeed, Policy Enforcers reverse the “charges” by saying that their need to touch us is an assault on them!

Policy Enforcers are/were merely glorified debt collectors with unlimited capacity (and stupidity) for violence.  The Human Body is “SURETY” for the artificial person.  So when policy enforcers ARREST people, it is because they are LIENING the artificial person insurance franchise.  The LIEN is extended to the SURETY, the human body; which was established by unlawful adhesion contracts via Birth Certificate, Social Security, Driver’s License, etc.

The Attorneys and cops do everything in their power to make it illegal to NOT have one of their UNLAWFUL ADHESION CONTRACTS.  Attorneys use the Power of Assumption to assume that people have willfully, intentionally, and voluntarily claimed that they are ARTIFICIAL PERSONS under penalty of perjury!  By virtue of signing the contract to get these illegal adhesion contracts, people are committing a crime of claiming to BE the state owned artificial person that represents them as human beings.  This itself is a crime by attorneys and cops.

Cops record themselves allegedly fabricating charges with suspect’s camera

In a US federal civil rights lawsuit, a Connecticut man has shared footage to bolster his claims that police illegally confronted the pedestrian because he was filming one of them. Authorities seized Michael Picard’s camera and his permitted pistol, and the officers involved then accidentally recorded themselves allegedly fabricating charges against the man.

Picard’s police encounter began as he was protesting a sobriety checkpoint while lawfully carrying a handgun in a holster. The plaintiff often protests near sobriety checkpoints in the Hartford region and is known by locals and police in the area, according to court documents. “Cops Ahead: Keep Calm and Remain Silent,” read the 3-foot-by-2-foot sign Picard held up to motorists ahead of the checkpoint in West Hartford last year.

According to the lawsuit, trooper John Barone walked up to Picard and said “someone called in” a complaint about a man “waving a gun and pointing it at people.” It’s a claim the lawsuit alleges is fabricated. The lawsuit also states that Barone “swatted” the digital camera out of Picard’s hands and onto the ground, at which point the battery dislodged. Barone seized Picard’s pistol and “took the handgun permit out of Picard’s pants pocket,” according to the suit.

The officer briefly walked away to a patrol car, and Picard picked up his camera, inserted the battery and began filming again, according to the suit.

“It’s illegal to take my picture,” the officer is overheard saying on the video.

“No, it isn’t,” Picard replies.

“It’s illegal to take my picture. Personally, it is illegal,” Barone says before taking the camera. “I got the camera,” he tells fellow officers.

The officer next put the camera on the light bar on the roof of a patrol car, pointed skyward. It was still running. There likely would be no lawsuit without the footage, Picard’s lawyer told Ars.

According to the lawsuit: “Unbeknownst to the defendants, Mr. Picard had been using the camera to record video and audio, not still photographs, and the camera continued recording until it was returned to Mr. Picard.”

After taking the camera, Barone started speaking with fellow troopers Patrick Torneo and John Jacobi, according to the tape and the federal lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union. The trio didn’t know this conversation was being recorded. After the brief encounter, Picard was given back his device, but not before he received two citations the lawsuit claims are unjustified.

According to the footage, when Barone checks to see if Picard has a permit for his weapon, he finds out from somebody on the radio that it’s “valid.” On the tape, you hear a big “ugh” from Barone, who seems upset that Picard is lawfully carrying a weapon.

The officers want to know if the lieutenant in the area has “any grudges” against Picard. Barone is next overheard saying that we “Gotta cover our ass.” The officers then allegedly plot other charges.

Jacobi: “So, we can hit him with reckless use of the highway by a pedestrian and creating a public disturbance….”

Barone: “Yeah.”

Jacobi: “[That’s] two tickets.”

Trooper Torneo is overheard on the footage saying they could “claim” that motorists complained about a man waving a gun “but that no one wanted to stop and give a statement.”

The tickets Picard got were for the alleged use of a highway by a pedestrian and for allegedly creating a public disturbance for carrying an “exposed loaded sidearm in plain view of passing motorists.” The authorities eventually dismissed the tickets.

Picard’s attorney, Dan Barrett of the ACLU, said his client likely wouldn’t have much of a case without this video evidence.

“It would be very tough,” the attorney told Ars. “It’s not always the way police say it is.”

How did the camera—and the unexpected footage—end up back with Picard? According to the suit:

After Mr. Picard had been given the tickets, defendant Torneo drove away from the scene with Mr. Picard’s camera still on the light bar of his cruiser. It fell onto the hood of the car, and Torneo stopped and instructed defendant Jacobi to give the camera back to Mr. Picard. Jacobi did so.

The suit claims violations of Picard’s First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights. Connecticut state police said they opened an internal investigation into the matter. The Connecticut State Police Union said the lawsuit is “frivolous and will ultimately be dismissed.”

Listing image by ACLU

The Shockingly Corrupt Oakland Police Department Destroyed In 16 Tweets

by Tyler Durden in Zerohedge

While the mainstream media attacked Donald Trump over his comments regarding Oakland, it appears the second most dangerous city in America is making headlines for even worse reasons. Confirming every stereotype of corrupt officialdom and the “above the law” mantra of today’s American cop, Oakland police department has been buried with bombshells in the last week. As summed up perfectly in these 16 tweets, Oakland cops and their “toxic, macho culture” are accused of everything from racist texts to child trafficking, and from murder cover-ups to under-age sex

But apart from that, trust the police, trust the process, trust in public officials. We are sure all of those involved in these various actions are just “lone wolves” and do not represent the great American police force at all.

And for those who were wondering, here is the lovely young lady  – Celeste Gaup –  who has had a physical relationship with around a dozen officers. According to the reports, she started when she was just 16.