US War of 1812 was Attempt to Abolish Original 13th Constitutional Amendment – Banning All Attorneys From Praxis

Money was the tool of destruction by Attorneys.

Shrout: There are certain provisions of NESARA that would prevent sliding into old habits.   And certainly one of the things that’ll be brought forward with the New Republic was the Original 13th Amendment which basically bans Attorneys.

Interviewer: Right, how did they just remove that? […]

Shrout: That’s what the War of 1812 was. They were trying to destroy that.  The British Troops […] tried to burn Washington DC and all existing copies of the original 13th Amendment.  That’s what they were trying to do with the War of 1812.  They didn’t accomplish it because an Original went to every State Legistlature of every State.  And, So eventually they started digging those out after all that time.

In any event, one of the provisions certainly of the New Republic under NESARA is the reinstitution of at least a concept of the original 13th Amendment that would ban the Agents from the City of London Temple Bar from interfering in the internal affairs of the United States of America.

The American Banker Association was the Military Academy of the Monopoly Predatory Military Banking Profession.

The American Bar Association was the Military Academy of Monopoly Predatory Military Legal Profession.

Federal Reserve and Judge Cites Bad Sources in Supporting “Lawful Money” as “Legalized Tender”

The Federal Reserve System website refers to the 1933 Emergency Bankruptcy as to the remedy to confiscation of Gold by making Federal Reserve Notes into “Legal Tender.”  The nature of such a profound legal change -that of outlawing lawful money for the paper ponzi banker debt notes- is such that judges actually had to entirely establish a NEW body of law called Statutory Law in 1933 based on Uniform Commercial Code.

Statutory Law of 1933 is/was the administration of the bankruptcy of the United States Inc from 1933 which made “Fed Notes” into “legal tender.”  The administration of the bankruptcy only needed to be established, which was had in 1938, and thus imposed across the US.

Continue reading Federal Reserve and Judge Cites Bad Sources in Supporting “Lawful Money” as “Legalized Tender”

Corporate U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives that are Israel Dual Citizens

Please note that each SENATOR and REPRESENTATIVE is its own UNIQUE Legal Presence Artificial Person.  That is to say, because of the nature of the OFFICE a suitable Insurance Franchise needs to be created in their “legal fiction” Trade Name.

The stunning thing about this is that the UNITED STATES, INCORPORATED does NOT recognize dual citizenship.  It is a product of the legal presence being a Trade-Name owned by the Governmental Services Corporation.  The Trade-Name is not actually transferable between private international corporations and the reason why they operate a treaty to allow “temporary franchise licenses” called “Visas.”

Continue reading Corporate U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives that are Israel Dual Citizens

Living “Inside” the Temple BAR Association — What Jurisdiction?

Column by Paul Hein.

Exclusive to STR

Income tax day usually falls around Easter, but while many people do not celebrate Easter, nearly all venerate the Internal Revenue Code on April 15. It is a cause for wonderment, since the income tax, being robbery (or theft) ought to rouse massive civil disobedience, rather than slavish adherence.

Of course, in saying that, I run the risk of being placed in the category of the lunatic fringe who question the right of The Rulers to rob us. Very well. But Judge Andrew Napolitano is certainly not of the aforementioned fringe, and he published an essay on LewRockwell.com on April 18, 2013 under the title “Taxation Is Theft.” The esteemed Murray Rothbard, in an article he wrote for The Libertarian magazine on April 15, 1969, declared “Taxation Is Robbery.”

How about evidence from the horse’s mouth, so to speak? Chapter 570 of Missouri Revised Statutes is headed “Stealing and Related Offenses.” At 570.030 we read, “A person commits the crime of stealing if he or she appropriates property or services of another with the purpose to deprive him or her thereof, either without his or her consent or by means of deceit or coercion.”

Continue reading Living “Inside” the Temple BAR Association — What Jurisdiction?