Fake News: The New Scapegoat –Finally, Real Definitions

Fake News is now being used as a scape-goat, an excuse, reason to be unreasonable.  Goldman Sacks is calling the “great stock rotation” fake news for not matching their “designer” financial narratives.  (lol… As if the US BOND BUBBLE that the FEDERAL RESERVE BLEW UP under EXTREME FINANCIAL EMERGENCY ACTIONS for over 8 YEARS in a row called Quantitative Easing (QE) [which is in reality creating hundreds of trillion of dollars in 1s and 0s digital debt and giving it for free to the member banks] and NEAR ZERO INTEREST RATES (that should have been negative; even though negative interest rates are insanity pills) wasn’t a bubble.

Furthermore, the reason why these EXTREME FINANCIAL EMERGENCY ACTIONS were important was because the DEBT AS MONEY system almost self-terminated in the 2007-2008 “financial crisis.”  These EXTREME FINANCIAL EMERGENCY ACTIONS basically are still in effect today….  as the crisis is NOT over.  Now Goldman Sacks is using FAKE NEWS to craft the financial narrative and denigrate any narrative that they cannot 1) control  2) earn mad profits upon  3) regardless of accuracy (as their designer “financial” script/High Frequency Trading manipulation [by Goldman Sacks] is not the end all/be all of markets)

Fake News is anything that is “published” that does not match the narrative trying to be spun.  Corporations have been buying “new-like placements” in the guise of news for decades but FAKE NEWS is far more political and/or life important/critical.  See the following:

Continue reading Fake News: The New Scapegoat –Finally, Real Definitions

JUSTINIAN-DECEPTION: (HIDDEN-FOREIGN-TEXT-KNOWN-AS-DOG-LATIN) The Mother of all Deceptions: The Concept of Modern Day Slavery

JUSTINIAN-DECEPTION: (HIDDEN-FOREIGN-TEXT-KNOWN-AS-DOG-LATIN) The Mother of all Deceptions: The Concept of Modern Day Slavery:

By: Romley Stewart.

This Article is not legal advice in any way, it is a story in relation to research and findings that have been uncovered in relation to such research directed at the grammatical appearance and the grammatical standing of Government, (Or what could be foreign de-facto governments) Court and Banking Contracts and Charges. This article hopefully may alert some of you to the dangers of entering into contracts when you are not aware of the importance of the grammatical appearance of the languages employed within such contracting paper instruments. Is the “legal title” you hold “really” saying what you assumed it to say?

An Account of “Grammatical Crimes” of Corporate Governance, courts and enforcement agencies by the use of DOG-LATIN: a “debased” criminal immoral foreign written language that renders all such DOG-LATIN documents, tendered by such corporate private governments, as “counterfeit”. DOG-LATIN is unhyphenated all uppercase Latin symbolic text that follows the grammatical rules of English and not the grammatical rules of Latin. It is the language of the Illiterate, (Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition) it looks just like English, “IT LOOKS JUST LIKE THIS” but grammatically, it is the deception right under your nose… It is the poison in the text, it is the corruption in the contract. If you hold any part of this debased criminal all uppercase text of the dead corporations, such as your Driver License, you are claiming membership to the Underworld, criminal counterfeit, corrupt, corporate world of the Dead Corporations. You become a criminal.

The “presumption” of a foreign military occupation of our country under the foreign control of Rome:

Continue reading JUSTINIAN-DECEPTION: (HIDDEN-FOREIGN-TEXT-KNOWN-AS-DOG-LATIN) The Mother of all Deceptions: The Concept of Modern Day Slavery

Hague Convention of 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents points to all Member Parties Being Religious Organizations

 

A Vatican flag flys in front of the Reichstag in Berlin on September 21, 2011 ahead of the Pope’s visit . The Pope will hold a mass is Berlin during his 4-day visit to Germany starting on September 22, 2011. AFP PHOTO / KAY NIETFELD GERMANY OUT (Photo credit should read KAY NIETFELD/AFP/Getty Images) ORG XMIT:

The Hague Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents is a very important Treaty between corporations called “States.”  This treaty regulates how “nations” (governmental service corporations) recognize each other’s Passports, Driver’s Licenses, Birth certificates, Death Certificates, Marriage Certificates,  School Diplomas, etc.

The Convention calls each Member a “Contracting State.”  The most basic summary of the contract is that it makes chattel with its “Citizens” out of the Nationals that the People, of every location, truly are.

Placing an “APOSTILLE” on the documents certifies the signature is authenticating for use in a foreign Contracting State.

The UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF STATE issues two different types of documents: 1) Apostille   2) Certificate of Authentication Continue reading Hague Convention of 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents points to all Member Parties Being Religious Organizations

New Republic via GCR — 220 Points of Fact as of May 2016

The Most Important Points:

  • The Treasury Reserve Note is Active and Trading Internationally
  • The UNITED STATES, INC and Federal Reserve [Notes] are not internationally recognized by members of the AIIB (which is just about the rest of the world).
  • The New Republic United States is recognized by 208 “Nations”.  They have gold on lease from the Dragon Families in China held in Reno, Nevada on an Indiana Reservation outside the jurisdiction of the foreclosed UNITED STATES, INC in a free-trade zone.
  • B.A.R. ATTORNEYS (and thus all judges) must renounce their BAR membership.
  • Any crimes by ATTORNEYS shall have remedy under the New Republic
  • NESARA is implemented.  Debt Jubilee.
  • IRS is toast, replaced with a flat transaction tax on NEW items.  Everything Second hand, including houses and cars, are only taxed on the first transaction.

My question here is this: Are they still requiring “Driver’s Licenses” to Exercise our Right To Travel with Impunity?

Continue reading New Republic via GCR — 220 Points of Fact as of May 2016

1982 U.S. Congress violates Constitution First Amendment religious clause

There is a legal code on the books Public Law 97-280, 96 Stat. 1211, 97th Congress, October 4th, 1982:

[S.J.Res.] 165]

Joint Resolution authorizing and requesting the President to proclaim 1983 as the “Year of the Bible.”

Whereas the Bible, the Word of God, has made a unique contribution in shaping the United States as a distinctive and blessed nation and people;

Whereas deeply held religious convictions springing from the Holy Scriptures led to the early settlement of our Nation;

Whereas Biblical teachings inspired concepts of civil government that are contained in our Declaration of Independence and the constitution of the United States;

Whereas many of our great national leaders—among them Presidents Washington, Jackson, Lincoln, and Wilson—paid tribute to the surpassing influence of the Bible in our country’s development, as the words of President Jackson that the Bible is “the rock on which our Republic rests”;

Whereas the history of our Nation clearly illustrates the value of voluntarily applying the teachings of the Scriptures in the lives of individuals, families, and societies;

Whereas this Nation now faces great challenges that will test this Nation as it has never been tested before; and

Whereas that renewing our knowledge of and faith in God through Holy Scripture can strengthen us as a nation and a people: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled , That the President is authorized and requested to designate 1983 as a national “Year of the Bible” in recognition of both the formative influence the Bible has been for our Nation, and our national need to study and apply the teachings of the Holy Scriptures.

Continue reading 1982 U.S. Congress violates Constitution First Amendment religious clause