Here is the article we are going to deconstruct: ‘Sovereign citizen’ movement threatens society as modern-day outlaws ignore government’s legitimacy
First, the term “Sovereign Citizen” is a term only legal idiots use, both for themselves and/or against others. Using it against others is simply abusive. It’s a non-sequitur term. It means nothing. It is a contradiction in itself. One cannot be a “sovereign” and a “citizen” at the same time. Anna von Reitz even points out that legal “sovereignty” is a legal condition of a public office/government employee.
This article is beginning from the context that the term itself is legally defined… when it’s not. That’s why it’s not a valid term. They go on to define the term, without any basis in law: “people who believe they owe no allegiance to any government and are not required to obey laws.”
This phrase is a direct misunderstanding of law and conflates the “legal identity/person” with the real actual wo/man. By default, actual real people do NOT owe any allegiance to any government, however “legal identity/person” always owes allegiance because it is a THING that the government, itself, created, owns, and manages. IT is not YOU, even when they call it a “person”, or a collection of IT as “people.” Someone BELIEF that they are an IT doesn’t make them into IT.
Governmental Services Corporation Watch 