Digital “Legal Identity” as a Database Entry – A Dream-house Built on Swampy Foundations

The Text below is mainly read aloud in the video. This is a must, there are great tautological arguments here. You are NOT their “legal avatar” for you. Any perception otherwise is the State duping you. If you think that “you are a citizen” or that “you need a Driver’s License to drive”… they already have duped you into thinking of yourself as their database entry.

To start with, let’s look at what the government issued identity is. Etymology of the term identity suggests it’s ‘sameness’, or ‘state of being the same’. Being same as something, even without defining what that thing is, suggests logically existence of two distinct things, one being the same with another. Turning words to action, identifying means ‘to perceive the identity of something’, or ‘to ascertain the identity of something’. It sounds as if the one identifying as a government issued identity is ascertaining oneself as being the same as it, whatever it is. If that’s the case, one should inquire into how this ‘thing’ was created.

Let’s see what the WEF report says on that. On page 14 of the WEF report, discussing the various actors in a digital identity ecosystem, it states: “The controller or delegate of the identity data, typically a trust anchor (such as a government) that issues and/or has the ability to control the identity data.”

If a government issues, that is, creates the identity data, and has the ability to control the data, a government creates and controls the nature of that identity itself. The question of what is it that one is supposed to identify as, just became a lot more interesting.

I don’t have to ‘identify as’ myself, since I am. Identifying as something else, is an acknowledgment, a legal act, of ascertaining oneself as ‘being’ the same as that ‘thing’ created by someone.


Legal Identity has been granted to Dolphins, rivers, mountains, artificial intelligence, and even debt-money, both as credit and debt. As a real non-legal non-fictional human being, you are none of those things that are labelled as a “legal identity”, yet we are expected to identify among those classes of things. “Identifying as” a “legal identity” makes you a thing that is own-able as property, controlled through that “legal identity” presumed to be you. You become their IT by identifying as IT.

Nikki Haley pushes to connect your legal identity-entity/avatar to and as your digital records. Government is outright pushing to make YOU into legally “being”/”appearing”/”manifest” as computer records and accounts. People have been writing under pseudonyms for ever to protect themselves from the government attempting to remove that anonymity of free speech. The following article is extremely important in this particular light…

Continue reading Digital “Legal Identity” as a Database Entry – A Dream-house Built on Swampy Foundations

Acting AS-King: How to Use a Birth Certificate to Purchase Allodial Titles (on vehicles, etc)

Audio Recording of Canadians discussing Allodial Title. Summarized below.

First, a story to set the tone. It may be true, it may not be true, regardless:
A guy in Toronto got the VIN number off a vehicle on a dealership lot. He sent a letter to ____ with the VIN and to put it in his name (via birth certificate). 30 days later, he got the title in the mail. He went to the dealership to pick up the car, but the dealer said he had not been paid. The dealer called the police. The police came and told the dealer to give the man his car. The Dealer finally admitted he had received payment for the car from the Treasury. The cops threatened the guy that he could be prosecuted for making false claims. He was given the keys to the car [kingdom?], and before driving off, he asked if it was OK that he drive without plates. The cops answered, “you are free to do what you want with that title.” He drove away with the car.

Legal Title, better yet title Allodium, has no greater title on a thing. No superior. The province has 0 jurisdiction over the vehicle if you have title. (Ed. The MCO for a car.) The opposite of feudal, by law.

Allodial title is a right.

When the dealer registers the car at purchase, they are surrendering the allodial title, MCO, to the State. You get the Use Title, but the State is the ultimate owner.

Birth Certificates are either:
1) Nothing to do with you. (aka. The state owns allodial title to the name) And you need to return all ID and everything connected to IT.
2) Allodial Title over the name on the birth certificate.

Continue reading Acting AS-King: How to Use a Birth Certificate to Purchase Allodial Titles (on vehicles, etc)

💰e18 – The “Taxpayer Money” Myth – Grace Commission Report💭⚔️ 🐉

I hope this spurs people to action… and inaction, regarding the IRS and “our” voluntary tax “obligations.”

UFO Witness Declaration

As PDF: https://www.bashar.org/UFO_Witness_Declaration.pdf

FACT: From 1982 to 1985, large triangular and boomerang-shaped UFOs were reported over the Hudson Valley by over 7,000 credible witnesses, including police and officials at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant.

FACT: In 1989 and 1990, large triangular and rectangular unidentified flying objects, one the size of an aircraft carrier, were reported over Belgium by over 2,000 witnesses, including police and military personnel.

FACT: In 1997, multiple sightings of a mile long boomerang-shaped UFO were reported over the state of Arizona by over 10,000 witnesses, including police, military personnel and Republican Governor Fife Symington.

We make no claims as to the nature or origin of these UFOs. However, those who have taken the time and effort to conduct serious, in-depth investigations into these reports know that these sightings are of real, physical crafts and are indisputable FACTS. Thousands of such sightings of physical crafts of unknown origin have been reported throughout the world for decades by credible witnesses, yet most who report such sightings are treated with ridicule, disbelief, scorn and even threats.

In light of the facts, we who have witnessed such unexplained crafts no longer accept this cynical mindset as realistic or credible.

Those of us who are witnesses to the UFO phenomenon know they exist for a fact. This is not an issue of speculation for such witnesses. However, we do not insist that non-witnesses must believe such objects exist, only that witnesses be treated with respect and that we deserve the same fairness and courtesy afforded to any individual or group who honestly expresses their point of view without fear of ridicule, punishment or persecution.

Recent polls clearly demonstrate that more than 50% of Americans believe that UFOs are a real phenomenon that deserves legitimate recognition and serious study by open-minded, qualified scientists, rather than being summarily dismissed as misperceptions, fantasies, hoaxes or hallucinations by cynical, unqualified debunkers. Over 36 million Americans have seen a UFO.

To put this statistic in political terms, these witnesses are also voters.

Therefore, we urge all who agree with the spirit of this declaration to send copies of this letter to their representatives, public officials, the media, the police, the military, airline officials, NASA and all candidates running for any public office to assure them that our votes will go only to those who acknowledge the UFO phenomenon as real and deserving of serious scientific investigation and who publicly endorse fairness and respect toward any witness who reports a UFO.

UK GBNews: Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes Exposes The Deep State & Trump’s Legal Defense – The Election Was Rigged – US Space Force “They’ve got the goods”

A very interesting interview with Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes on GBNews was recently broadcast. She spoke of many interesting facts documented here.

From the Interview:

Jan points out that Trump has due process to subpoena people and information because the charges are not (most serious) sedition-treason.

She claims that Biden is the legitimate President of the bankrupt US Corporation. The United States became a corporation in 1871 with the Organic Act separating the territory of District of Columbia and creating a new incorporation to rule it called “United States.” This new “United States” is specified, by law, to have and operate on a second Constitution like the first. This second (incorporated) “Constitution of the United States” supersedes the original actual “Constitution for The United States.”

It is theorized that Trump will use his Executive Order 13848 on foreign election interference to help show that the election was manipulated to the degree that results were changed.

Jan claims that the US Space Force has the real results from the 2020 Presidential Election because of her participation with some Task Force at the Department of Defense. “They’ve got the goods. They’ve got the goods! and Trump knew that if he presented any of the goods early on, we’d have a civil war. That he really felt that the people needed to see how bad it could get.”

Continue reading UK GBNews: Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes Exposes The Deep State & Trump’s Legal Defense – The Election Was Rigged – US Space Force “They’ve got the goods”

Welcome to the New America: Do not question the official fictional narrative… or you will be punished

The users and view counts on this blog, since 2019, has been decimated from censorship and reporting the facts contrary to the “official fictional narrative.” They’ve weaponized money and fund “The Big Lie” of the “official fictional narrative.” They’ve turned off the money for truth tellers and even those questioning.

Asking good questions and not a conservative nor liberal trait/problem. The abuse of the system documented by Andrew Tate affirms my own experiences: the legal system is weaponized against us by “a/the deep state”, UN?, etc?

Hack the Banks – Variable Interest Loans Reset Compounding Interest If $1 Minimum Paid Each Day – Pay No Interest

This documents a great way to “beat the banks.”

This only works with variable interest rate loans. The way it works is that each day the interest compounds, however the interest is reset if paid that day.

By paying $1 each day, this resets the compounding interest rate to 0 so the full payment at the end of each month goes to the principle and not to any interest.

This works for car loans, credit cards, home loans and even student loans. When only paying off the principle, it take reduce the time to full payoff by 70-80%.

The banks do not like this being used and may even try to sue people who use this method.

Australian Taxation Office – 51 824 753 556 – is owned by Blackrock and MP Jim Chalmers?

Is the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) (ABN 51 824 753 566) actually a corporate asset-holding of Blackrock, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Bank of Australia, Quantum Corporation, Tier-3, Trustee for Patricia Holdings, Trustee for Zarina Khan, and MP Jim Chalmers [Australian House of Representatives – Treasurer] (James Edward Chalmers) via Ultimate Holding for All Company?

Who is Zarina Khan and Patricia Holdings? And how can the Australia Taxation Office be their asset?

If “taxes” are overseen by these banks and people, then the UN Member-State Governmental Services Corporation of Australia does not have legitimate tax authority. What relation does the ATO have to the World Bank and IMF? Inquiring minds would like to know.

ChatGPT Illuminates the Differences Between “Legally Driving” and the “Right to Travel”

In my own due diligence of law, I have discovered these facts as well; which is why I share what chatGPT is saying. The problem is that what ChatGPT says runs contrary to the common [mis-]conceptions of driving and the law. Here is what its says:

Prompt: But the right to travel does not apply to legal identities as legal identities have no rights, only privileges.

Answer: That is correct. Legal identities, such as corporations or other entities, do not have the same rights as natural human beings. Their legal status is created by law and they exist solely for legal purposes, such as conducting business transactions or owning property. As such, the right to travel, as a fundamental human right, only applies to natural human beings and not to legal entities. However, legal identities may still be subject to regulations and restrictions on their ability to operate and conduct business in certain locations or under certain circumstances.

Prompt: so how does a legal identity have the right to travel when they only have privileges?

Answer: A legal identity does not have a right to travel as such, but rather they have the privilege to travel under certain conditions, such as possessing a driver’s license. This privilege is granted to them by the state or government, which has the authority to regulate and restrict travel for public safety and other reasons.

However, the right to travel is a fundamental right belonging to natural persons, including those without a legal identity, as recognized under international law and many national legal systems. The right to travel for natural persons cannot be lawfully denied without due process of law, and any such deprivation would be a violation of human rights.

Continue reading ChatGPT Illuminates the Differences Between “Legally Driving” and the “Right to Travel”

The Twelve Presumptions of Court

Canon 3228

A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt:

Continue reading The Twelve Presumptions of Court

Michelle Obama registered to vote as a Man? Blackmail Material?

Make up your own mind on this… “Michelle” Obama apparently registered to vote as a man for many years. Even Obama himself has referred to “her” as “Michael.” This video is citizen reporting. I’m ok with this being true, if it is. I’m not ok with the lies, cover-up, and possibly murder[s?] (Joan Rivers?) to keep it a secret.

In totally absolutely unrelated news… What is on Hunter Biden’s Laptops? Only one was “lost” and made “public” (privatized/legalized/fictionalized by “attorneys-are-asshoe”) to the “FBI-is-asshoe” and friends/foes (who promptly put everything in the deepest darkest cave recess for no one to find), but let’s look-at/consider ALL of Hunter’s laptops… including the ones stolen by Russia/Russian-Mob. Surely, nothing related to Obama or Michelle will be found on them…. right? Ahem: RIGHT???

In further unrelated news: Do the Sheriffs, State Police, Federal policy enforcers, DoJ, et al, realize that they are working for people who are protecting pedophiles with tax payer money? Why are the clients of Epstein not arrested and in prison yet? (put your LEO comments on this below).

Continue reading Michelle Obama registered to vote as a Man? Blackmail Material?

Social Security Administration Denies Maryland Statute FOIA, Claims to be Above State Laws

North America, Jan 20, 2023 – belisoful – I recently attempted to get copies of the Agreements that the Social Security Administration has with the States as defined in 20 CFR 422.103 (b) (2):

(2) Birth registration document. We may enter into an agreement with officials of a State, including, for this purpose, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and New York City, to establish, as part of the official birth registration process, a procedure to assist us in assigning Social Security numbers to newborn children. Where an agreement is in effect, a parent, as part of the official birth registration process, need not complete a prescribed  application and may request that we assign a Social Security number to the newborn child.

Very little has been said about these agreements between SSA and the 50 states, plus DC, Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands, and New York City anywhere.

Wait…. Why is New York City, like DC, not part of the 50 states?!? This law is definitive proof that New York City has the same “foreign corporation” status as District of Columbia. New York City seems to have been taken over by the United Nations. Indeed, the UN NYC Headquarters agreement even explicitly states (in Annex 1) that the UN can “widen” their territory to Manhattan (an international banking zone), New York City (the international “capital of the world” so says Rudy Giuliani), and even to the State of New York [and there is evidence of this too]! (and without any conditions or exceptions.)

Here is what I mean by the State of New York being part of New York City-UN… If a New Yorker lives in New York City, that is enough evidence of being an “in state” person for New York College/University tuition, however, if the New York is outside New York City, students must provide an “Affidavit of State Residency” to legally (read: fictionally) establish “State of New York” identity. New York City/State is the only State that has such bizarre conditions and requirements.

This law is definitive evidence that New York City is NOT part of the State of New York, but that New York City is foreign to the 50 states. Thus, I’d like to see that agreement defined in 20 CFR §422.103 (b)(2) between SSA and New York City and the other States and Jurisdictions (DC, Puerto Rico, Virgin Island).

Has the contract/agreement been standardized? Are there differences in the agreements based upon jurisdiction? Are the 50 State agreements any different than the agreements with DC/NYC?

So, I sent the Social Security Administration (SSA) a FOIA Request to see the agreement between the SSA and New York City and other jurisdictions…

Continue reading Social Security Administration Denies Maryland Statute FOIA, Claims to be Above State Laws

🖋e17 – Solutions: Signature Colors, Copyright ©, and Reserving Rights (w/ UCC §3-402(b)(1) vs. §1-308) 🎨🛠🗺🛟

Knowledge about our signature is critical in this time of lawfare.  It is being used against us but we can take our signature back to be our tool to protect us.  This video goes over various colors of inks for signatures and the meaning behind each color, why copyrighting our signature is so important, and how to reserve our rights with UCC §3-402 (b)(1) Signature by Representative versus UCC §1-308 Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.  This briefly touches upon the US Social Security Administration SS-5 Application for SS Card and reservation of rights versus being the authorized representative (also known as “attorney-in-fact” or “agent”).

Continue reading 🖋e17 – Solutions: Signature Colors, Copyright ©, and Reserving Rights (w/ UCC §3-402(b)(1) vs. §1-308) 🎨🛠🗺🛟