USCode Proves All U.S., Inc Child Support Orders are Pre-Paid by the Court

NOW, THEREFORE, THE UNDERSIGNED ARBITRATOR…. Arbitrators determine remedy in these unconstitutional courts. Not a jury of peers.

There are so many children harmed in family separations in the UNITED STATES, INC. One of the many harmful aspects is when one parent does not and/or cannot pay for Child Support.  From stories I have heard from friends, these courts tend to PRE-position themselves as the man is “wrong” and “harmful” with a severe anti-masculine bias.

The courts likely do this to stop any direct action that men tend perform as negative to access to their children.  That itself was very disturbing a psychological pattern of the court agents/officers and agencies.

One way that we would put our foot down for the betterment of child, the betterment of our ex’s, the betterment of the situation, and even the betterment of the court, is to READ THIS ONE LAW:

Title 28 U.S. Code §1738B – Full faith and credit.

Full Faith and Credit is a term of art and is underwriting.  Anything that requires the FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE UNITED STATES is a debt negotiable instrument worth itself as an accounting line item.

(b)DEFINITIONS.In this section:
  (1)The term “child” means—
    (A) a person under 18 years of age; and
(B) a person 18 or more years of age with respect to whom a child support order has been issued pursuant to the laws of a State.

Clearly, a “child” means a legal “PERSON” -which means an artificial corporate trade name insurance franchise.

Also, We find that Child Support Orders are Issued, as in like negotiable instruments are ORDERED and ISSUED, by U.C.C. Article 3 – Negotiable Instruments § 3-104 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT and § 3-105 ISSUE OF INSTRUMENT.

Compounding, we next see that all these WORDS in the “LEGAL CODE” are UPPER CASE, pointing to DOG LATIN, BASTARDIZED ENGLISH – The Justinian Deception.

(2) The term “child’s State” means the State in which a child resides.

This translates into The Child is Property of the State because they have a LEGAL FICTIONAL PRESENCE that “resides” in the DC Municipal Corporation of THE STATE.  The child is property of the State.  We see how this is true in the full disclosure meaning of a MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE.

All the human rights abuses that occur by U.S. Child Protective Services is all the reason to have them completely shut down forever.  Those “agencies” are kidnapping for profit, no joke.

(4)The term “child support” means a payment of money, continuing support, or arrearages or the provision of a benefit (including payment of health insurance, child care, and educational expenses) for the support of a child.

We know that MONEY means LEGAL TENDER via Title 31 U.S.C. §5103, and the Washtenaw County PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND Insurance Coverage Documentation.

(5)The term “child support order”—
  (A) means a judgment, decree, or order of a court requiring the payment of child support in periodic amounts or in a lump sum; and
    (i) a permanent or temporary order; and
    (ii) an initial order or a modification of an order.

Another name for an “Order of a Court” is called a WARRANT.  An “order of a Court” is literally a “Money” Order -by U.C.C. Article 3 -Negotiable Instruments!

According to the State of Washington Department of Treasury:

A warrant — or check — is a legal, negotiable instrument drawn against the state treasury in place of a commercial bank. State agencies disburse funds to vendors or other payees by issuing warrants from the state treasury that bear the State Treasurer’s unique Routing Number and are signed by the State Treasurer.

Because the responsibility for authorizing and producing warrants resides with individual state agencies, inquiries about a payment made by a state agency should be directed to the issuing agency.

The Child Support Order is an order of the Court (the state agency) disbursing funds (child support money order checks) to vendors (contestants/defendants/plaintiffs) by issuing (28 U.S.C. § 1738B) a warrant (the child support order) from the state treasury.  Every Child Support Order has the State Treasurer’s unique Routing Numbers attached.

The authority for issuing debt against the “STATE STATUTORY CITIZENS” and producing warrants (child support money orders) resides with the highly unconstitutional family courtrooms (which are NOT courts; as they are merely administrative bankers offices).

(6)The term “contestant” means—
  (A)a person (including a parent) who—
    (i) claims a right to receive child support;
    (ii) is a party to a proceeding that may result in the issuance of a child support order; or
    (iii)  is under a child support order; and
  (B) a State or political subdivision of a State to which the right to obtain child support has been assigned.

This section of the legal code is highly disturbing.  It calls everyone a CONTESTANT, as if the child’s life were some kind of fictional game.

Furthermore, the state has the authority to pay itself for anything it deems reasonable no matter how unreasonable.  There does not seem to be any recourse to criminality in the system designed into the legal code here.  The State seems to be enabling itself to issue unlimited amounts of debt to itself against the “STATUTORY CITIZENS” of the state.

(7)The term “court” means a court or administrative agency of a State that is authorized by State law to establish the amount of child support payable by a contestant or make a modification of a child support order.

A “court” refers to a “real” common law court that simply does not exist in the UNITED STATES, INC.   so “court” was crossed out for clarity purposes.  These “family courtrooms” are ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES!!!  They have no lawful “judicial” jurisdiction.

We move out of DEFINITIONS into other Processes and Arrangements.

(c) Requirements of Child Support Orders.A child support order made by a court of a State is made consistently with this section if—
  (1) a court that makes the order, pursuant to the laws of the State in which the court is located and subsections (e), (f), and (g)—
    (A) has subject matter jurisdiction to hear the matter and enter such an order; and
    (B) has personal jurisdiction over the contestants; and
  (2) reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard is given to the contestants.

Court of a State does not have jurisdiction to ENTER such a MONEY ORDER, however, if it does, the court is simply issuing   a debt ON BEHALF OF THE CONTESTANT!!!!   It is the Contestants job to deposit the CHILD SUPPORT MONEY ORDER IN THE BANK…  the funds are literally drawn against the STATE TREASURY DEBT UNDERWRITING FACILITY -as documented by the STATE OF WASHINGTON – TREASURY.

The word PERSONal -is in “PERSONAL JURISDICTION”- refers to the artificial corporation person.  PERSON is another name for an INSURANCE FRANCHISE of operating a HUMAN BEING within their fraudulent legal fictional debt slavery system.


This entire section refers to “ISSUING” warrant money orders against the State Treasury 10 times.

In a proceeding to establish, modify, or enforce a child support order, the forum State’s law shall apply except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3).

In interpreting a child support order including the duration of current payments and other obligations of support, a court shall apply the law of the State of the court that issued the order.

In an action to enforce arrears under a child support order, a court shall apply the statute of limitation of the forum State or the State of the court that issued the order, whichever statute provides the longer period of limitation.

First, CHOICE OF LAW refers to the fact that Family Courts are ENTIRELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL and that using a Family Court is ENTIRELY the choice of the contestants.

Second, IN GENERAL refers to the Family Courtroom as a MILITARY PROCEEDING.  They have Gold Fringed Flags meaning statutory commercial military.

Third, the Family Courtroom is referred to as merely a FORUM for STATE’S “legal code.”  And yes, there you have in folks, in their own words.

Next, “a court shall apply the law of the State of the court that issued the order.”  Here is definitive evidence that the LAW OF STATE OF ISSUANCE OF ORDER is a CHOICE OF LAW.  It is not REQUIRED to be followed…  it can only be followed voluntarily.  Again, they issued these negotiable instruments for out benefit, so we need to use them.

and lastly, “a court shall apply the statute of limitation of the forum State or the State of the court that issued the order…” means that we only have a limited amount of time to collect the state issued warrant to pay for the child support.


If you have an attorney, you may ask and they are required by law to tell you how to do it.  If they don’t and/or they can’t, their legal incompetence is no excuse.  Either Attorneys are knowingly committing these scams or their are criminally negligent of the scam the courts are committing.

Next, Get a copy of the CHILD SUPPORT MONEY ORDER.  It can be tendered with ANY of the following institutions:

  • any Federal Reserve Bank
  • the State Treasury
  • any bill (which they are required to return the over payment).
  • and with the ISSUING FAMILY COURT.

These should be made via U.C.C. Article 3 Negotiable Instruments – §3-501 PRESENTMENT.  This is done the same way as depositing any “check” as every check is a “warrant” if it came from the state!

To deposit a CHILD SUPPORT MONEY ORDER, sign the back:

without prejudice, all rights reserved
by:/s/   (your autograph)©/, in propria persona
(first)-(m.i./middle): (last name), in propria persona, American National, authorized representative U.C.C. 3-402b1

All these autograph additions are important BTW.  If you don’t know them, you should.

“without prejudice” means that the government corporation cannot apply codes that you haven’t explicitly agreed to.

“all rights reserved” means that your basic human rights are not waived for any reason.

“by:/s/” means that you are a living breathing human being.  placing your signature before an “X:” means that one is deceased.

“©” always copyright ones signature as it is the copyrighted artwork that makes debt worth anything, according to law.  and Attorneys use WITH PREJUDICE to steal the signature artwork on WARRANTS such as explicitly as Family Courts do!

“in propria persona” means that one is signing “in our proper human-identity.”

Lawful names are formatted NOT in upper case.  UPPER CASE NAMES are reserved for legal fictions.  so the name JOHN QUINCY DOE would become john-quincy: doe.

Finally “authorized representative U.C.C. 3-402b1” has so much importance in cannot even be described with words.  This means that you -as the human being- are not responsible for the debts of the ARTIFICIAL PERSON CONTESTANT.

Why this is important is that all CHILD SUPPORT ORDER is issued against the ARTIFICIAL PERSON CONTESTANT.  But the warrants-orders are also worth the debt they claim on them.  So, being the authorized representative of the warrant means that the ARTIFICIAL PERSON is liable for “paying it” rather than the Human Authorized Representative.

Put another way, The ARTIFICIAL PERSON CONTESTANT is a second you.  It is a corporation that is designed to Represent you within their LEGAL FICTIONAL game.  They even call people CONTESTANTS like a game.  The second corporate “you” is a trade name.   It acts in DEBT COMMERCE so you don’t have to.  Their ARTIFICIAL PERSON represents you within THEIR legal debt slavery system.

Being AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE means that they court CANNOT hold anything but the ARTIFICIAL PERSON accountable for the DEBT…  and issuing debt is very very easy.  Anyone can issue any amount they want.  Debt is just an accounting line item.

So, call the courtrooms out.  Call the Attorneys out of their scam.  Make a U.C.C. Article 3 § 3-501 Presentment of the CHILD SUPPORT MONEY ORDER to the FORUM of STATE LAW.

The FAMILY COURTROOM FORUM OF STATE LAW created the debt, they are liable for it…   for the benefit of your child.

Marriage Licenses: The Real Truth about Marriage Certificates

The nature of MARRIAGE LICENSES in this article applies to EVERY nation operating as a CORPORATION with BAR Attorneys.

And congratulations to all LGBTQx: we have won the right for non-sexual ARTIFICIAL PERSON CORPORATE TRADE NAMES to now form a business “partner”-ship (of state) together for the benefit of the corporation pretending to be a government.

These “marriage licenses” are merely debt insurance products enabling the STATE CORPORATION to create as much debt-money-tender from the negotiable instrument as possible…  and in the process steal our relationship energies!  That’s why relationship become noticeable more difficult after marriage….  the STATE CORPORATION is draining the relationship energy by being a third party, and acting uncaringly (rehypothecating the debt to near unlimited amounts) -quite literally- against the other two parties to the marriage license contract; parties that are mere artificial person corporations for being UPPER CASE NAMES.

Marriage Licenses: The Real Truth about Marriage Certificates

Marriage Licenses: The Real Truth
by Virgil Cooper

Distributed under Fair Use for documenting what a (Same Sex) MARRIAGE LICENSE is and looks like: a Bank Note

Enlightening Conversation with a Marriage License Bureau….

About 15 years ago, my former wife of 26½ years, filed for divorce. We had seven (7) children: five (5) daughters and two (2) sons. Our youngest at the time, our second son, was five years old. At the time, I prepared a counterclaim to the Petition for Dissolution her attorney filed in Domestic Relations (DR) court.

I met one afternoon with the head of the Maricopa County Superior Court, Marriage License Bureau, in downtown Phoenix. The marriage license bureau was headed by a young woman of about age 25. I asked her to explain to me the general and statutory implications of the marriage license. She was very cooperative, and called in an Assistant, a tall Black man who at the time was working on an Operations Manual for internal departmental use.

She deferred for most technical explanations to her Assistant. He walked through the technicalities of the marriage license as it operates in Arizona. He mentioned that marriage licensing is pretty much the same in the other states — but there are differences. One significant difference he mentioned was that Arizona is one of eight western states that are Community Property states. The other states are Common Law states, including Utah, with the exception of Louisiana which is a Napoleonic Code state.

He then explained some of the technicalities of the marriage license. He said, first of all, the marriage license is Secular Contract between the parties and the State. The State is the principal party in that Secular Contract. The husband and wife are secondary or inferior parties. The Secular Contract is a three-way contract between the State, as Principal, and the husband and wife as the other two legs of the Contract.

He said, in the traditional sense a marriage is a covenant between the husband and wife and God. But in the Secular Contract with the state, reference to God is a dotted line, and NOT officially considered included in the Secular Contract at all.

He said, if the husband and wife wish to include God as a party in their marriage, that is a “dotted line” they will have to add in their own minds. The state’s marriage license is “strictly secular,” he said. He said further, that what he meant by the relationship to God being a “dotted line” meant that the State regards any mention of God as irrelevant, even meaningless.

In his description of the marriage license contract, the related one other “dotted line.” He said in the traditional religious context, marriage was a covenant between the husband and wife and God with husband and wife joined as one. This is not the case in the secular realm of the state’s marriage license contract. The State is the Principal or dominant party. The husband and wife are merely contractually “joined” as business partners, not in any religious union. They may even be considered, he said, connected to each other by another “dotted line.”

The picture he was trying to “paint” was that of a triangle with the State at the top and a solid line extending from the apex, the State, down the left side to the husband, and a separate solid line extending down the right side to the wife, a “dotted line” merely showing that they consider themselves to have entered into a religious union of some sort that is irrelevant to the State.

Marriage License
Secular Contract Diagram
(primary party)
(secondary party) (secondary party) .

He further mentioned that this “religious overtone” is recognized by the State by requiring that the marriage must be solemnized either by a state official or by a minister of religion that has been “deputized” by the State to perform the marriage ceremony and make a return of the signed and executed marriage license to the State.

Again, he emphasized that marriage is a strictly secular relationship so far as the State is concerned and because it is looked upon as a “privileged business enterprise” various tax advantages and other political privileges have become attached to the marriage license contract that have nothing at all to do with marriage as a religious covenant or bond between God and a man and a woman.

By way of reference, if you would like to read a legal treatise on marriage, one of the best is “Principles of Community Property,” by William Defuniak. At the outset, he explains that Community Property law descends from Roman Civil Law through the Spanish Codes, 600 A.D., written by the Spanish juris consults.

In the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a for-profit venture or profit-making venture (even though it may never actually produce a profit in operation) and as the wife goes out to the local market to purchase food stuffs and other supplies for the marriage household, she is replenishing the stocks of the business. To restate: In the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a business venture, that is, a for-profit business venture. Moreover, as children come into the marriage household, the business venture is considered to have “borne fruit.”

Now, back to the explanation by the Maricopa County Superior Court, Marriage Bureau’s administrative Assistant. He went on to explain that every contract must have consideration. The State offers consideration in the form of the actual license itself – the piece of paper, the Certificate of Marriage. The other part of consideration by the State is “the privilege to be regulated by statute.” He added that this privilege to be regulated by statute includes all related statutes,and all court cases as they are ruled on by the courts, and all statutes and regulations into the future in the years following the commencement of the

marriage. He said in a way the marriage license contract is a dynamic or flexible, ever-changing contract as time goes along – even though the husband and wife didn’t realize that.

My thought on this is can it really be considered a true contract as one becomes aware of the failure by the State to make full disclosure of the terms and conditions. A contract must be entered into knowingly, intelligently, intentionally, and with fully informed consent. Otherwise, technically there is no contract.

Another way to look as the marriage license contract with the State is as a contract of adhesion, a contract between two disparate, unequal parties. Again, a flawed “contract.” Such a contract with the State is said to be a “specific performance” contract as to the privileges, duties and responsibilities that attach.

Consideration on the part of the husband and wife is the actual fee paid and the implied agreement to be subject to the state’s statutes, rules, and regulations and all court cases ruled on related to marriage law, family law, children, and property. He emphasized that this contractual consideration by the bride and groom places them in a definite and defined-by-law position inferior and subject to the State. He commented that very few people realize this.

He also said that it is very important to understand that children born to the marriage are considered by law as “the contract bearing fruit” – meaning the children primarily belong to the State, even though the law never comes out and says so in so many words.

In this regard, children born to the contract regarded as “the contract bearing fruit,” he said it is vitally important for parents to understand two doctrines that became established in the United States during the 1930s. The first is the Doctrine of Parens Patriae. The second is the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis.

Parens Patriae means literally “the parent of the country” or to state it more bluntly – the State is the undisclosed true parent. Along this line, a 1930s Arizona Supreme Court case states that parents have no property right in their children, and have custody of their children during good behavior at the sufferance of the State. This means that parents may raise their children and maintain custody of their children as long as they don’t offend the State, but if they in some manner displease the State, the State can step in at any time and exercise its superior status and take custody and control of its children – the parents are only conditional caretakers. [Thus the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis.]

He also added a few more technical details. The marriage license is an ongoing contractual relationship with the State. Technically, the marriage license is a business license allowing the husband and wife, in the name of the marriage, to enter into contracts with third parties and contract mortgages and debts. They can get car loans, home mortgages, and installment debts in the name of the marriage because it is not only a secular enterprise, but it is looked upon by the State as a privileged business enterprise as well as a for-profit business enterprise. The marriage contract acquires property through out its existence and over time, it is hoped, increases in value.

Also, the marriage contract “bears fruit” by adding children. If sometime later, the marriage fails, and a “divorce” results the contract continues in existence. The “divorce” is merely a contractual dissolution or amendment of the terms and

conditions of the contract. Jurisdiction of the State over the marriage, over the husband and wife, now separated, continues and continues over all aspects of the marriage, over marital property and over children brought into the marriage.

That is why family law and the Domestic Relations court calls “divorce” a dissolution of the marriage because the contract continues in operation but in amended or modified form. He also pointed out that the marriage license contract is one of the strongest, most binding contractual relationships the State has on people.

At the end of our hour-long meeting, I somewhat humorously asked if other people had come in and asked the questions I was asking? The Assistant replied that in the several years he had worked there, he was not aware of anyone else asking these questions. He added that he was very glad to see someone interested in the legal implications of the marriage license and the contractual relationship it creates with the State.

His boss, the young woman Marriage Bureau department head stated, “You have to understand that people who come in here to get a marriage license are in heat. The last thing they want to know is technical, legal and statutory implications of the marriage license.”

I hope this is helpful information to anyone interested in getting more familiar with the contractual implications of the marriage license. The marriage license as we know it didn’t come into existence until after the Civil War and didn’t become standard practice in all the states until after 1900, becoming firmly established by 1920. In effect, the states or governments appropriated or usurped control of marriages in secular form and in the process declared Common Law applicable to marriages “abrogated.”

Please pass this information along and share it as widely as possible.

Original message from Virgil Cooper:

Ron Paul Interviews Julian Assange: “Going After Wikileaks Because They Humiliated the CIA”

Wikileaks is being called a NON-STATE Intelligence Service.  Investigative Journalists investigating Human Right Crimes and analyzing it is called JOURNALISM.

By this new definition of “INTELLIGENCE SERVICES” as meaning “FREEDOM OF SPEECH,”  all news -e.g. Huffington Post, New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times, FOX News, CNN, RT, BBC, Al-Jeezira, etc- are Intelligence Services.

Investigative Journalists publish news publicly and use it for exposing criminal governmental service corporations.

INTELLIGENCE SERVICES keep the news private and use it for their own advantages.

For the reason that these NEWS ORGANIZATIONS, are INCORPORATED within a Parent governmental corporation, e.g. UNITED STATES INC, RUSSIA INC, ENGLAND INC, CHINA INC, etc, then these NEWS ORGANIZATIONS not reporting the full extent of governmental crimes for their own benefit would be thus a STATE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE.

Freedom of Speech -as defined by the Constitution- is about human speech.  However, moving from the Lawful system to the STATUTORY CORPORATE LEGAL FICTIONAL SYSTEM (with their own Incorporated Constitution from 1871, and Statutory Constitution from 1938), the Freedom of Speech has been re-defined as the “right to issue debt”, as per CITIZENS UNITED v F.E.C.  Debt is the only “freedom of speech” that there is within the legal system.  Everything is made into DEBT-EQUITY by attorneys world wide, and they simply assume that Corporate Personhood and/or DEBT can/will protect them from the obviousness of the human rights abuses of what debt actually is: SLAVERY.

The Attorneys for the “News Organizations” State Intelligence Services are provenly primarily working for THE STATE CORPORATION.  For this reason, all NEWS ORGANIZATION ATTORNEYS literally refuse to let anything TOO criminal to come out about attorneys lest it expose their position as colluding to keep news from the public.

Ron Paul Interviews Julian Assange: “Going After Wikileaks Because They Humiliated the CIA”

Mac Slavo    April 28th, 2017


Dr. Ron Paul puts things in perspective – the outlaw Julian Assange, and his often-targeted Wikileaks organization, are not a threat against national security, but an embarrassment to its many shady dealings.

via the Ron Paul Institute:

Wikileaks Founder and Editor-in-Chief Julian Assange joins the Liberty Report to discuss the latest push by the Trump Administration to bring charges against him and his organization for publishing US Government documents. How will they get around the First Amendment and the Espionage Act? The US government and the mainstream media — some of which gladly publish Wikileaks documents — are pushing to demonize Assange in the court of public opinion. Wikileaks is registered as a 501(c)3 organization in the US. Find out more about the organization and how you can help:

Julian Assange Speaks Out: The War On The Truth

Read more:

Ron Paul Defends Assange: “Don’t Allow This President To Declare War On the Truth”

The Mystery of Wikileaks’ Cryptic “Vault 7”: Do You Know What This Means?

BREAKING: Julian Assange Suggests MURDERED DNC STAFFER Seth Rich Was Wikileaks Source: “We Have To Understand How High The Stakes Are In the United States”

Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.

NYTimes: People Are Seeing U.F.O.s Everywhere, and This Book Proves It

This GSC blog writer has seen several ET crafts.  One was a group of 6 lights that move across the sky, then formed a triangle.  The triangle rotated in 3D, then the crafts literally fizzled away into the darkness as they were performing 3d Triangle acrobatics.  There were no red/white “blinking” lights.  The colors were magnificently rainbow multicolor.  Words cannot describe the color patternings.

That is just one of several experiences.  It is happening.  Just look up into the sky.  They are out space brothers and sisters.

People Are Seeing U.F.O.s Everywhere, and This Book Proves It

A protest in Washington, D.C., in 1995 outside the offices of the General Accounting Office. Joshua Roberts/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

SYRACUSE — Why have sightings of unidentified flying objects around the nation more than tripled since 2001? Why is July the busiest month for U.F.O. sightings? Why did they spike in Texas in 2008, or in New Mexico in September 2015?

And how in the world, or out of it, has Manhattan racked up New York State’s second-highest tally of U.F.O. sightings in this century?

These questions and many others emerge from the first comprehensive statistical summary of so-called close encounters: 121,036 eyewitness accounts, organized county by county in each state and the District of Columbia, from 2001 to 2015.

The unlikely compendium, “U.F.O. Sightings Desk Reference,” is the work of a couple in Syracuse, who crunched unruly data on U.F.O. reports collected by two volunteer organizations: the Mutual U.F.O. Network, or Mufon, and the National U.F.O. Reporting Center, or Nuforc.

It is the reference “U.F.O. researchers dreamed of having,” Gordon G. Spear, emeritus professor of physics and astronomy at Sonoma State University in California, writes in the foreword.

The book contains no narrative or anecdotal accounts, just 371 pages of charts and graphs that slice and dice the geography and timing of the incidents and the various shapes that witnesses reported: flying circles, spheres, triangles, discs, ovals, cigars.

Many of the sightings turn out to be explainable, the authors say, but a small percentage defy resolution.

The authors are Cheryl Costa, 65, a former military technician and aerospace analyst, and her wife, Linda Miller Costa, 62, a librarian at Le Moyne College and a former librarian at the National Academy of Sciences, NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency.

Working on PCs amid sewing tables in the upstairs parlor — the warmest room in their hundred-year-old house — the two spent weekends for the last 16 months extrapolating figures from sightings reports and laying out the graphics.

Cheryl Costa was writing New York Skies, a U.F.O. blog for The Syracuse New Times, when the Costas decided to expand their tallies of U.F.O. sightings nationwide. “We wanted to do our bit for disclosure,” she said. “It’s something the government should have been doing.”

The Costas realize some might find this a strange way to spend weekends. But both say they have spotted U.F.O.s themselves and want to detoxify the subject.

“We’re doing scientific research,” Cheryl Costa said. “What’s crazy is not being willing to look at research.”

She came to the collaboration roundabout, having served as a cable lineman in the Air Force in Vietnam, and afterward in the Navy’s submarine service, as a man before undergoing gender-reassignment surgery in the 1980s. Ordained as a Buddhist nun, she was running a theater group in Maryland when she met Linda. They wed in 2011.

U.F.O. trackers welcomed their publication.

“With this compendium, Cheryl and Linda Costa have reminded the public and the media the extraterrestrial phenomenon continues unabated,” said Stephen Bassett, founder and executive director of the Paradigm Research Group, which lobbies for disclosure of official U.F.O. records.

Cheryl Costa, left, and Linda Miller Costa, the authors of “U.F.O. Sightings Desk Reference.” Heather Ainsworth for The New York Times

Rebutting a common perception that U.F.O. sightings are on the wane, the Costas’ book shows that sightings have risen in waves, to 11,868 nationwide in 2015 from 3,479 in 2001. Only a small fraction of sightings are actually reported to Mufon or Nuforc.

Their labor of love is about the numbers, just the numbers, and the Costas refrain from speculating on what exactly is happening. “We really don’t know,” Linda Costa said. “But all these people are seeing these things.”

The government officially quit the U.F.O. business in 1968, with the finding in the Condon report from the University of Colorado that there was nothing significant to investigate, although some 30 percent of the incidents were unexplained.

Mufon’s 500 volunteer investigators, however, continue to check out many of the sightings reported to the group. Roger Marsh, a Mufon spokesman, said that of the 270 cases his group investigated in Manhattan from 2002 through 2016, 44 eluded explanation and remained “unknown.”

One of the most intriguing occurred on the afternoon of Sept. 17, 2011, when a man on the roof terrace of the New Museum on the Bowery photographed a fast-moving diamond-shaped object with windows and flashing blue and red lights against the TriBeCa skyline.

According to Mufon, it resembled an unknown flying object photographed in Round Rock, Tex., two weeks earlier.

The Costas listed 426 sightings in New York County from 2001 to 2015, second in the state’s tallies only to Suffolk County, on the tip of Long Island, with 554. How so many sightings in the nation’s densest core and around its toniest beach resorts have escaped wider notoriety is just part of the mystery.

For the U.F.O. enthusiast, the pages of graphs and charts are a treasure trove of hard-to-find detail.

The District of Columbia, with 9,856 people per square mile, had the fewest sightings: 154. (A political snub from deep space?) Wyoming, with 5.8 people per square mile, had more than twice as many: 337.

Fireballs made up nearly 8 percent of the sightings in Indiana (230) and fewer than 5 percent in Colorado (157).

California, the most populous state, led the nation in U.F.O. reports (15,836, more than the next two states, Florida and Texas, combined). Los Angeles County alone had more sightings than 40 states, followed by Maricopa County, Ariz., which includes Phoenix.

Population fails to explain the figures conclusively, the Costas said. Washington State, with 6.7 million people according to the 2010 census, ranks No. 4 in sightings, ahead of Pennsylvania, with 12.7 million people, and New York State, with 19 million.

Rather, the Costas theorize, the figures may reflect good West Coast weather, which draws more people outside where they may spot U.F.O.s. Nationwide sightings peak in July, they found, and drop off between December and February.

Still, in Mississippi, U.F.O. reports spike in January and November; in New Mexico, in September.

The arduous breakdown by the nation’s more than 3,000 counties was notable for revealing clusters of sightings in remote regions, places where U.F.O.s are almost never mentioned. But every county in the United States appears to have seen at least one U.F.O.

In the end, the Costas noted, the spikes may have a lot to do with media coverage.

Venezuela On The Verge Of Revolution: A Quick Overview

Venezuela On The Verge Of Revolution: A Quick Overview

By James Holbrooks

Venezuela, a country with only $10 billion left in reserves to run on, is in trouble. The people are starving. The government has gone full-on authoritarian, and now desperate human beings are dying in the streets.

From an Associated Press report on Friday:

Authorities in Venezuela say 12 people were killed overnight following looting and violence in the South American nation’s capital amid a spiraling political crisis.

Continuing, the report further highlighted the gravity of the situation:

Most of the deaths took place in El Valle, where opposition leaders say 13 people were hit with an electrical current while trying to loot a bakery protected by an electric fence.

These are people without options, forced to turn to thievery to stay alive. And they died because of it.

On April 6, The Economist reported that over the past year, 74 percent of Venezuelans lost an average of 20 pounds. Venezuela, incidentally, has topped Bloomberg’s Economic Misery Index for the past three years.

The country began its slide downward into chaos with the election of President Nicolas Maduro, who immediately began implementing socialist programs and has since taken extreme measures to secure his position.

At the end of March, for instance, Maduro effectively shut down Venezuela’s congress — his primary political opposition — and gave those legislative duties to his puppet Supreme Court.

The latest news coming out of the South American nation — aside from the deaths of people trying to steal bread to live — is that General Motors, whose Venezuelan production facility was overtaken by local authorities, has now ceased all operations in the country.

To put that in perspective, consider that in 2016, only 3,000 vehicles were sold in Venezuela, a country of 30 million people.

The U.S. Southern Command has floated the idea of using the United States’ military to contain unrest in Venezuela, though historically American intervention in South America is both widely unpopular in the region and wildly unsuccessful.

As we look on at the continuing horrors in the Middle East and what seems, at the moment, to be the makings of World War III in Asia, let’s not lose sight of the fact that right now, the people of Venezuela are in pain.

Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo

U.S. Public Servant Questionnaire: First Line of Defense against unlawful Police

Every time a Police Officer talks, they are speaking through their LEGAL [fictional] ARTIFICIAL PERSON CORPORATION ENTITY construct.

When they ask for a name, that name is AUTOMATICALLY legalized into its UPPER CASE representation.

Police do NOT tell us that every time they talk to anyone, the “person” they talk to is already under suspicion BY LAW.  Such full terms and conditions are required to be disclosed by the TRUTH IN LENDING ACT -where the insurance franchise they are assuming exists is debt loaned into existence from nothing and thus covered by the TRUTH IN LENDING ACT-.

By Law, every time a Corporate AGENT/OFFICER speaks, they are to treat the human being as if they are GUILTY until PROVEN INNOCENT, by way of the still enforced LIEBER CODE, along with the TRADING IN THE ENEMY ACT, makes all human beings enemies of the Corporate “State“!

With this in mind, every time a Corporate POLICY ENFORCER opens their mouth, they are to automatically treat the human as a legal fictional criminal.  Indeed, just stopping someone in their policy enforcement car automatically puts the “driver” under administrative arrest.  They are required to say the Miranda Warning first thing when talking to a “driver,” yet most policy enforcers break these codes EVERY TIME.

In the STATE OF MICHIGAN, their APPLICATION FOR DRIVER’S LICENSE claim as legal language above the signature, “I certify under the penalty for perjury that I am a legal Michigan resident, the statements made on this application are true, and that a court is not holding my license.”  the first two “I”s refer to the human being, then the human is “fit” into a “legal Michigan resident” which is the “legal presence artificial ‘person’ corporation trust trade-name insurance franchise” that is corporate property owned by the STATE.

This legal language makes claiming to be a human over a “corporation” a felony crime..  just for having a Driver’s License.  This is what clergy would call “Original Sin.”  It is the first commission of a crime by temptation and suggestion.  The simple idea that a human being “needs” a Driver’s License to “Drive” is Neuro-Linguistic Programming, start to finish, birth to death within the LEGAL SOCIETY of ARTIFICIAL PERSONS.  The Right to Travel is independent, immutable, inviolatable, and may be used with IMPUNITY (total disregard for the violence that criminal mistrained corporate policy enforcers, as it is the violence that is the crime).

Policy Enforcement AGENTS depend upon this original commission of claiming to be NON-HUMAN to treat us as just that.

By way of WITH PREJUDICE, every officer may simply ASSUME (especially by POWER OF ASSUMPTION!!!) that these unlawful adhesion contracts exist and may be acted upon even if it is NOT true!

With that, the first line of defense is to have the PUBLIC SERVANT fill out the following questionnaire before they even open their mouth (but after they have placed your artificial person under administrative arrest by talking to “it”).

This form presents the PUBLIC SERVANT with the knowledge that the “person” they are talking to is the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, and not the ARTIFICIAL PERSON representing the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

This form was originally given to me and then edited for AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE information; as that is one of the most authoritative positions to be in according to statutory code.  U.C.C. Article 3 §3-402 (b) (1) clearly indicates that the AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE cannot be held accountable for the debts of the ARTIFICIAL PERSON!

Print this form out and use it any time a POLICY ENFORCER attempts to engage with you as an ARTIFICIAL PERSON.

Public Servant Questionnaire PDF

Instructions for Use

Print this form out and Carry this with you at all times.  Present it to any PUBLIC SERVANT who decides to get cheeky with their job and fictional “authority.”

Have this ready whenever they talk to you.  When they approach, give the form to them and say, “YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED.”

Refuse to answer any questions until it is filled out.  just say and repeat: “I don’t answer any questions.  Please fill the form out.”

DO NOT FOLLOW ANY ORDERS, as the orders do not have any authority nor standing until such authority/standing is PROVEN by a completed questionnaire.  It is recommended that we force policy enforcers to act in violent, combative, and belligerent ways rather than just comply with their unlawful orders.  (all orders by policy enforcers are unlawful, especially in light of the WRIT MANDAMUS issued at the COMMON LAW preventing all COLOR OF LAW actions.)

This is just one of many real-time solutions for dealing with unlawful POLICY ENFORCERS…  which is all of them.

This form works for non-legal human beings, assumed artificial persons (which is the primary job of policy enforcers), and World Citizens.

URGENT! National Security and International Terrorism ALERT

Received from reader with request to provide this information to our readers. You may want to get involved and use this as a guide to send your own letters to the appropriate individuals for where you live, including Wash DC.  Providing this information because we are personally aware of people who have been abused and victimized (murdered) by these weapons.  This report is providing TRUE FACTS.

Urgent National Security and International Terrorism Alert

Dear Sir/Madam,
Please read the following notification carefully as it requires actions on your part and might have legal implications for you and your office in future.
I am writing to inform you of large-scale human rights violations and systematic physical attacks on the civilian population within all countries of the world using modern electromagnetic weapons and neuro-weapons, often in combination with non-consensual implants and covertly administered nanotechnology.

What makes these weapons particularly dangerous and devastating for societies is that they act covertly. Using the fact that electromagnetic waves propagate without being noticed by humans and can penetrate walls, these weapons can be used to destroy human life and permit the perpetrators to escape detection.

The systematic and clandestine nature of the crimes and their striking similarity around the world indicate that it is a global program run by the international military-intelligence complex committing premeditated mutilation, torture, systematic subjugation and a silent genocide of parts of the population. It amounts to crimes against humanity and a global death camp program.

I am writing to formally request that under you statutory duty to investigate crimes against humanity, protect the civilian population from acts of terrorism, communicate matters of national importance to your government and uphold human rights, or otherwise, you pass on this message to the relevant authorities and you yourself act within your means to ensure that all victim cases are investigated and that these large-scale criminal operations are shut down in your country by 1st June 2017.

The actions you take in response to this communication will be followed up over the coming months and, should it turn out that you chose to ignore this notification and your duties to act to stop these crimes and to support the victims, you might be charged with, for example, official misconduct, malfeasance in office, dereliction of duty, conspiracy, aiding and abetting crimes against humanity, high treason or your legal system’s equivalent of such offences. Should that be the case, you will be called to account and held liable in one of the upcoming court or tribunal cases for crimes against humanity.

The attacks on victims are launched from mobile directed energy weapon units as well as telecommunication infrastructure such as cell towers and satellite systems. This is an integrated weapons system that has been built up covertly around the world. The weapons system is now fully operational around the world and is destroying innocent victims’ life in the millions and is subverting nations covertly. Individual victims are hounded and tormented by the national surveillance networks, encircled by perpetrators at all times and systematically tortured and mutilated with electromagnetic as well as ultrasonic weapons in public as well as in their homes.

The assaults exploit the fact that beams from

electromagnetic weapons are silent, invisible and can penetrate the walls of buildings such that victims can be assaulted everywhere without leaving traces that lead back to the perpetrators. By these means, victims are effectively placed into individual concentration camps that are erected around them by the intelligence agencies, corrupted members of law enforcement and their network of criminal operatives.

This operation is accompanied by targeted slander campaigns, infiltration and subversion of every aspect of victims’ life, including their social circle, their family, their work place and especially their medical care. Operatives enter victims’ home clandestinely, damage property, sabotage computer equipment directly or remotely, poison food and run harassment campaigns to psychologically disintegrate the victims so that they are eventually driven to suicide or are murdered.

The electromagnetic and neuro-weapons have capabilities that transcend anything that the world has experienced in terms of weapons technology in the past. Due to their ability to attack and manipulate biological processes, inner organs and the human nervous system as well as neurological processes, these devices are the most dangerous weapons produced by mankind to date.

The effect on humans is devastating as the weapons can simulate many illnesses, cause pain and organ damage, brain damage, strokes, heart attacks and death. The most common form of harm through the use of these weapons is DNA damage and tumour formation and eventually cancer. DNA damage in the reproductive eggs of women alters the mitochondrial DNA and thus damages entire future generations. The operations of these weapon systems is therefore a threat to the future of humanity itself.

Another insidious aspect of these weapons is that they can be used to impair, alter and control human bodily functions, movement, behaviour and even thought processes often without the  realisation of the victim. This can be used to subvert the functioning of every aspect of human endeavour from personal relationships, business endeavours, to democratic processes and the national security infrastructure of a nation.

Mobile directed energy weapons come in all sizes and have various capabilities. They are hidden by the perpetrators in adjacent properties, cars, drones, planes and even parts of the national infrastructure. Agents of the surveillance networks carry assault weapons in bags and rucksacks. This covert weapons system is fully integrated and centrally controlled. Victims who fled to other countries discovered that their assault protocol travels with them and is continued by the local surveillance and law enforcement system in whichever country they reside.

From what could be established from declassified documents, the organisational matrix of the assault teams follows the protocol used for the death squads run by the large intelligence agencies in, for example, Vietnam and South American countries. It is of paramount importance for national security to stop this terrorism and shut down the funding and the systems that enable its proliferation.

The weapons technology itself has largely been classified for a very long time. There are, however, countless publicly known cases from around the world where the weapons have been applied to individuals over many years with the intent to intimidate, torture, maim and murder. From the testimonies of those victims, many of whom have shared their plight online on blogs and through social media, publicly known patents and declassified documents, we know of the devastating effect of these weapons and the staggering scale of the crimes being committed around the world.

Please assist us in stopping this global silent Holocaust.

Yours sincerely,

Yours in the search for openness and respect for universal human rights:

John Finch
5/8 Kemp St
Thornbury, Vic 3071
TEL: 0424009627