Category: corruption

💰e18 – The “Taxpayer Money” Myth – Grace Commission Report💭⚔️ 🐉

I hope this spurs people to action… and inaction, regarding the IRS and “our” voluntary tax “obligations.”

Attorneys Not Allowed to Practice Law: British Magistrate Removed for Filing Nuremberg Case Against UK Government

Even UK “Attorneys” (called Barristers), in government as Magistrates “JP” are not allowed to “practice law” when it conflicts with the abuse of law by government. This is direct evidence that “rule of law” is weaponized against “The People.”

The Magistrate was removed from the bench because 1) she signed the filing as “JP”; and 2) she sent a letter that conflicted with the government “safety and guidance” protocols.

From the Rule of Law to Weaponized Law

by Paul Craig Roberts (link to original) – In my book, The Tyranny of Good Intentions (2000), I discussed the weaponization of law in order to easier convict criminals.  Once this process begins, it expands.  In the 21st century we have witnessed a remarkable expansion in the weaponization of law. For example, the use of weaponized law against Trump rally attendees and against President Trump himself.  The weaponization of law has brought no protests from law faculties, bar associations, Congress, media, or federal judges. 

Consequently, we have become a society in which the function of law is to get someone or to achieve an agenda that cannot be achieved legislatively.  The person doesn’t have to be guilty of a crime.  Merely being demonized or disapproved of suffices.  Law now serves not justice but  political and ideological emotions and the agendas of the powerful. 

That the entire legal profession and all of its institutions have stood aside for this transformation of law indicates that freedom is no longer a value.  Consequently, Constitutional protections are less and less enforced.  White Americans have suffered discrimination in university admissions, hiring, and promotion for more than a half century.  Government and its agencies have used print, TV, and social media to censor and control explanations.  Spying on citizens without court approved warrants is widespread. The US has declared its law to be enforceable worldwide, even applicable to foreign national journalists such as Julian Assange, and to the President of Russia.

(ed. note: Assange is explainable as the “courts” being “military courtroom tribunal” franchises of the UN and Assange being a “UN National” from WW2 (defined as war criminals); everyone is “domestic” under the UN which is how the 11th Amendment was corrupted and legal fictionally “construed” to not protect Assange.)

Continue reading From the Rule of Law to Weaponized Law

Shifting Your Bank Accounts to FedNow Without Your Knowledge – Lynette Zang

“Your” bank account is NOT safe from the Federal Reserve Social Credit System. This is perception management to keep you from knowing about this change over of your accounts to be controlled by the Federal Reserve FedNow system.

Everything has changed about banking. They are doing everything they can to make it seem like nothing has changed; changes are “hidden” to make deeper research required.

The old system had to die, and was put on life support, to get FedNow in place.

“Fiserv” is a FedNow payment processing early adopter and banks are going through them (and other FedNow adopters)… ergo, the accounts are FEDNOW.

Vote with your money.

Welcome to the New America: Do not question the official fictional narrative… or you will be punished

The users and view counts on this blog, since 2019, has been decimated from censorship and reporting the facts contrary to the “official fictional narrative.” They’ve weaponized money and fund “The Big Lie” of the “official fictional narrative.” They’ve turned off the money for truth tellers and even those questioning.

Asking good questions and not a conservative nor liberal trait/problem. The abuse of the system documented by Andrew Tate affirms my own experiences: the legal system is weaponized against us by “a/the deep state”, UN?, etc?

Anti-Government

We are not anti-government. The fictitious fraudulent corporation posing as government is framing the understanding that it is not a legitimate government as anti-government; they are claiming to be a legitimate government when they provenly, in law and history, are not.

What the status quo calls “government” is actually a De-Facto Corporation (for the legal identity called “people”-“person” but is purposefully and maliciously a think that is being confuse as if it were You) pretending to be a de jure government (for the actual lawful non-legal people).

The current “government” is literally defined by law, in many ways and authoritative sources, as a corporation. Corporations are defined by law as De Facto so called “governments” due to their illegitimacy and unlawful use of [illegitimate color of law] force to maintain “power.”

We should be absolutely against the illegitimate corporation posing as a government. And for our proper knowledge and understanding that we do not have a government that represents us as actual non-legal real physical human beings, we are being called anti-government.

I am FOR a legitimate De Jure Government that doesn’t abuse corporate color of law fictions to make fictional narratives to rationalize and legalize common law crimes.

Not a single attorney has actually produced any evidence that the “legal identity” is connected to the human being. According to international law, contract law is the only law. We have many literal physical contracts for these illegitimate governments to impose their color of law statutes. Birth Certificates, Driver’s License, Passport, SSN, but they also refuse to honor their cancellation and impose that legal identity where it is absolutely unlawful, especially by color of law attorneys and judges in “court.”

Continue reading Anti-Government

BTW, There Are No US Bank Reserve Requirements As Of March 2020 – Zero Solvency Solutions

If you didn’t get the memo, the Federal Reserve removed all “reserve requirements” for US banks. Meaning, US banks are not required to have any of the depositors money on hand. Another effect is that banks are allow to loan any amount of money into existence from nothing in total disconnection from their actual holdings (or lack of holdings). $0 (or one penny, if you insist on “value” of debt) can be leveraged into $1 quadrillion dollars ($1000 million million), which is -in effect- what we see with the entire derivatives market.

Eide Bailly reports Federal Reserve Eliminates Reserve Requirements:

The Federal Reserve [“quietly”] announced they were reducing the reserve requirement ratio to zero percent across all deposit tiers as of March 26, 2020. This comes as the COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact much of the way financial institutions both operate and serve their customers.

The easiest to resolve “insolvency of banks” is to make them all insolvent (reduce the reserve requirement ratio to zero) and then put them all out of business. In such a state, there won’t be any banks to be insolvent; and thus the bank insolvency problem is resolved (given there are no banks left except the central “sovereign” insolvent bank/BIS).

Australian Taxation Office – 51 824 753 556 – is owned by Blackrock and MP Jim Chalmers?

Is the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) (ABN 51 824 753 566) actually a corporate asset-holding of Blackrock, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Bank of Australia, Quantum Corporation, Tier-3, Trustee for Patricia Holdings, Trustee for Zarina Khan, and MP Jim Chalmers [Australian House of Representatives – Treasurer] (James Edward Chalmers) via Ultimate Holding for All Company?

Who is Zarina Khan and Patricia Holdings? And how can the Australia Taxation Office be their asset?

If “taxes” are overseen by these banks and people, then the UN Member-State Governmental Services Corporation of Australia does not have legitimate tax authority. What relation does the ATO have to the World Bank and IMF? Inquiring minds would like to know.

The Twelve Presumptions of Court

Click to access 12PresumptionsOfCourt.pdf

Canon 3228

A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand true [Or as “truth in commerce”]. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt:

Continue reading The Twelve Presumptions of Court

Michelle Obama registered to vote as a Man? Blackmail Material?

Make up your own mind on this… “Michelle” Obama apparently registered to vote as a man for many years. Even Obama himself has referred to “her” as “Michael.” This video is citizen reporting. I’m ok with this being true, if it is. I’m not ok with the lies, cover-up, and possibly murder[s?] (Joan Rivers?) to keep it a secret.

In totally absolutely unrelated news… What is on Hunter Biden’s Laptops? Only one was “lost” and made “public” (privatized/legalized/fictionalized by “attorneys-are-asshoe”) to the “FBI-is-asshoe” and friends/foes (who promptly put everything in the deepest darkest cave recess for no one to find), but let’s look-at/consider ALL of Hunter’s laptops… including the ones stolen by Russia/Russian-Mob. Surely, nothing related to Obama or Michelle will be found on them…. right? Ahem: RIGHT???

In further unrelated news: Do the Sheriffs, State Police, Federal policy enforcers, DoJ, et al, realize that they are working for people who are protecting pedophiles with tax payer money? Why are the clients of Epstein not arrested and in prison yet? (put your LEO comments on this below).

Continue reading Michelle Obama registered to vote as a Man? Blackmail Material?

Social Security Administration Denies Maryland Statute FOIA, Claims to be Above State Laws

North America, Jan 20, 2023 – belisoful – I recently attempted to get copies of the Agreements that the Social Security Administration has with the States as defined in 20 CFR 422.103 (b) (2):

(2) Birth registration document. We may enter into an agreement with officials of a State, including, for this purpose, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and New York City, to establish, as part of the official birth registration process, a procedure to assist us in assigning Social Security numbers to newborn children. Where an agreement is in effect, a parent, as part of the official birth registration process, need not complete a prescribed  application and may request that we assign a Social Security number to the newborn child.

Very little has been said about these agreements between SSA and the 50 states, plus DC, Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands, and New York City anywhere.

Wait…. Why is New York City, like DC, not part of the 50 states?!? This law is definitive proof that New York City has the same “foreign corporation” status as District of Columbia. New York City seems to have been taken over by the United Nations. Indeed, the UN NYC Headquarters agreement even explicitly states (in Annex 1) that the UN can “widen” their territory to Manhattan (an international banking zone), New York City (the international “capital of the world” so says Rudy Giuliani), and even to the State of New York [and there is evidence of this too]! (and without any conditions or exceptions.)

Here is what I mean by the State of New York being part of New York City-UN… If a New Yorker lives in New York City, that is enough evidence of being an “in state” person for New York College/University tuition, however, if the New York is outside New York City, students must provide an “Affidavit of State Residency” to legally (read: fictionally) establish “State of New York” identity. New York City/State is the only State that has such bizarre conditions and requirements.

This law is definitive evidence that New York City is NOT part of the State of New York, but that New York City is foreign to the 50 states. Thus, I’d like to see that agreement defined in 20 CFR §422.103 (b)(2) between SSA and New York City and the other States and Jurisdictions (DC, Puerto Rico, Virgin Island).

Has the contract/agreement been standardized? Are there differences in the agreements based upon jurisdiction? Are the 50 State agreements any different than the agreements with DC/NYC?

So, I sent the Social Security Administration (SSA) a FOIA Request to see the agreement between the SSA and New York City and other jurisdictions…

Continue reading Social Security Administration Denies Maryland Statute FOIA, Claims to be Above State Laws