Ron Paul Interviews Julian Assange: “Going After Wikileaks Because They Humiliated the CIA”

Wikileaks is being called a NON-STATE Intelligence Service.  Investigative Journalists investigating Human Right Crimes and analyzing it is called JOURNALISM.

By this new definition of “INTELLIGENCE SERVICES” as meaning “FREEDOM OF SPEECH,”  all news -e.g. Huffington Post, New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times, FOX News, CNN, RT, BBC, Al-Jeezira, etc- are Intelligence Services.

Investigative Journalists publish news publicly and use it for exposing criminal governmental service corporations.

INTELLIGENCE SERVICES keep the news private and use it for their own advantages.

For the reason that these NEWS ORGANIZATIONS, are INCORPORATED within a Parent governmental corporation, e.g. UNITED STATES INC, RUSSIA INC, ENGLAND INC, CHINA INC, etc, then these NEWS ORGANIZATIONS not reporting the full extent of governmental crimes for their own benefit would be thus a STATE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE.

Freedom of Speech -as defined by the Constitution- is about human speech.  However, moving from the Lawful system to the STATUTORY CORPORATE LEGAL FICTIONAL SYSTEM (with their own Incorporated Constitution from 1871, and Statutory Constitution from 1938), the Freedom of Speech has been re-defined as the “right to issue debt”, as per CITIZENS UNITED v F.E.C.  Debt is the only “freedom of speech” that there is within the legal system.  Everything is made into DEBT-EQUITY by attorneys world wide, and they simply assume that Corporate Personhood and/or DEBT can/will protect them from the obviousness of the human rights abuses of what debt actually is: SLAVERY.

The Attorneys for the “News Organizations” State Intelligence Services are provenly primarily working for THE STATE CORPORATION.  For this reason, all NEWS ORGANIZATION ATTORNEYS literally refuse to let anything TOO criminal to come out about attorneys lest it expose their position as colluding to keep news from the public.

Ron Paul Interviews Julian Assange: “Going After Wikileaks Because They Humiliated the CIA”

Mac Slavo    April 28th, 2017

wikileaks-insurance-leak-document-encrypted-si_-e1476470042793

Dr. Ron Paul puts things in perspective – the outlaw Julian Assange, and his often-targeted Wikileaks organization, are not a threat against national security, but an embarrassment to its many shady dealings.

via the Ron Paul Institute:

Wikileaks Founder and Editor-in-Chief Julian Assange joins the Liberty Report to discuss the latest push by the Trump Administration to bring charges against him and his organization for publishing US Government documents. How will they get around the First Amendment and the Espionage Act? The US government and the mainstream media — some of which gladly publish Wikileaks documents — are pushing to demonize Assange in the court of public opinion. Wikileaks is registered as a 501(c)3 organization in the US. Find out more about the organization and how you can help: https://wikileaks.org/

Julian Assange Speaks Out: The War On The Truth

Read more:

Ron Paul Defends Assange: “Don’t Allow This President To Declare War On the Truth”

The Mystery of Wikileaks’ Cryptic “Vault 7”: Do You Know What This Means?

BREAKING: Julian Assange Suggests MURDERED DNC STAFFER Seth Rich Was Wikileaks Source: “We Have To Understand How High The Stakes Are In the United States”

Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.

CPS seizes child after parents challenge ADHD diagnosis

CPS can only “take” children based upon the jurisdiction of the artificial person BIRTH CERTIFICATE.  The child is surety for the JUDGEMENT DEBT ORDER by the Courtroom.

I know attorneys who work in Family Courtrooms.  They say that the Family Courtrooms are the MOST Unconstitutional courts in the Governmental Services Corporation.

Such CPS fraud can only be persisted with the attorney-supported deception/confusion between the ARTIFICIAL PERSON and the human being.

We see here public testimony of the crimes by CPS and why they need to be shuttered immediately for such slavery crimes.

CPS seizes child after parents challenge ADHD diagnosis

Image: CPS seizes child after parents challenge ADHD diagnosis

(Natural News) An Ohio couple, Christian and Katie Maple, lost custody of one of their children after they disagreed with the school’s mental health assessment of their child.

Camden Maple, a seven-year-old boy, has five siblings and enjoys Star Wars, Pokémon, football, video games, and Legos. He loves to write stories and draws comic books. While this sounds like an ordinary, creative, imaginative American little boy who can, according to his mom, be “rambunctious” at times, his school said that he needed mental health help.

While the school diagnosed him with ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder), his parents, who know him better than anyone else, believe that his “rambunctious” actions stem mostly from boredom and not being challenged in the classroom. Camden has been tested a full grade above his current one and often finishes assignments before the rest of the class. When he spends the extra time doodling, Camden gets punished for his creativity.

Does that make him a disobedient or bad child? According to administrators at the public Bowman Primary School in Lebanon, Ohio, it does. They insisted that Camden is “mentally unstable” and needs professional mental health assistance to deal with his disability.

“We as parents do not have the problems the school claims to have with him, at home. We know how to deal with a rambunctious 7 year old, but the school is content with making him believe that he is a bad child; we disagree,” the Maples said.

CPS seizes little boy after a twisted joke at school

Following an incident at school, Christian and Katie were called to pick up their son. He had been a little disruptive in class and told one of the school counselors that he wanted to “erase himself from the earth” because he was a bad kid.

Instead of seeking professional mental health help, the Maples decided to have an extended conversation with their son first, sorting out the issues on a family level. As reported by his parents, there was no reason for concern. During their long talk, Camden explained that he did not want to hurt himself and just said it because he was upset and wanted to see what the counselor would say. His parents added that before this statement, Camden never said anything about harming himself.

The school thinks he is ADHD; we as parents disagree,” the Maples explained. “We believe that it stems mostly from boredom and not being challenged in the classroom. The school has tried on several occasions to get us to have him diagnosed, so that he can be medicated.”

The Maples made suggestions to his teachers about how to handle Camden. They explained that Camden doodles or becomes restless because he is bored, not because he has ADHD. Their comments and suggestions all got ignored, and the school decided to call Child Protective Services (CPS), accusing them of “health neglect.”

After several visits to their home, eight police officers surrounded the couple’s house on March 3, 2017, and took Camden away based on false accusations and ADHD diagnosis. Rather than addressing the issues – by skipping a grade or giving him extra assignments – the CPS abducted a healthy, little boy from his loving family, stamped him with the label of a mental disease, and put him on damaging ADHD medication and mandatory therapy.

Camden never showed any signs of depression or the intention to hurt himself or others. He is just too smart for his age and bored. Nonetheless, the school called the CPS when the Maples did not comply with their demand to get their child diagnosed with ADHD and medicated.

The Maples are still fighting to get their son back and wonder if they fell victim to a money greedy school that wanted funding by having him diagnosed as a special needs child.

Has the world gone mad? Find more twisted news stories at Twisted.news.


Sources include:

thenewamerican.com

healthimpactnews.com/

Math Illegal? Oregon Board criminalizing Freedom of Speech and Unlicensed “Practice of Engineering”

As a “Software Engineer”®©™ (at the Common Law; ®©™ as tongue in cheek), educated in a prestigious American university (equivalent to M.I.T. -by their standards-), working as a “software engineer” for high-end open-source web frameworks, many successful and still operating web projects, having been screwed by “worked for” banks, transnational conglomerate auction houses, fast paced business consulting firms, small business consulting, business development, and “self-employed” (and all of those under false pretenses of what debt as money is and is not; and unconscionable contracts with the UNITED STATES, INC)…  and every one of them hired me based upon the exercise of my (constitutionally) protected freedom of speech to say and write my prior job experience.

Would I be “practicing engineering” by saying and writing that software companies hire me as a “software engineer” without some legalized license to practice?  and without being “designated” as an “engineer”?

How is it that the word “engineer” has been “legalized”/ “legally defined” (which is merely a LEGAL FICTION) such that the statutory codes precludes the right to freedom of speech?

LEGAL FICTIONAn assumption that something occurred or someone or something exists which, in FACT, is not the case, but that is made in the law [merely legalisms of fiction] to enable a court [-room, administrative court, debt collectors] to equitably [by debt!] resolve [because it was already solved] a matter before it. [the matter existed before the debt, making the matter superior to the debt; but in the LEGAL SYSTEM debt is sovereign by definition!]

BTW: Sovereign is legally defined as:    2. In the United States the sovereignty resides in the body of the people. Vide Rutherf. Inst.282.  The “BODY of the PEOPLE” are all ARTIFICIAL PERSON corporations OWNED by the STATE (CORPORATIONS).  The Artificial PERSONS corporations [legal presences that “represent” us in the system] are insurance franchises backed by DEBT.  Birth Certificates make up the TRUST that contain the debt.  The California Vital Records BANK NOTE SPECIALIST has said by phone, “it [the birth certificate] wouldn’t be a BANK NOTE without the BAR CODE!”  So the “BODY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES INCORPORATED” are literally DEBT accounting line items as negotiable instruments via Birth Certificates.  The human body is SURETY for the debt in violation of U.C.C. Article 3-402 (b) (1): “If the form of the signature shows unambiguously that the signature is made on behalf of the represented person who is identified in the instrument, the representative is not liable on the instrument.”  The “represented person”- Person being the key word for the artificial “person” corporation insurance franchise.

Attorneys also go after people for “Unlicensed Practice of Copyrighted LEGAL CODE [they call ‘LAW’]”.  After the Article here, there is an Analysis of the Legal definitions and CODES in Oregon that dives into what makes using the word “engineer” illegal in Oregon.

Illegal Math? Oregon State Board criminalizing speech about traffic lights and unlicensed “practice of engineering”

Running red lights can get you a ticket. But in Oregon, you can be fined just for talking about it.

Mats Järlström learned this first-hand last year when the state of Oregon fined him $500 for publicly suggesting that yellow lights should last for slightly longer to accommodate cars making right turns.

Mats is a tinkerer. In the great tradition of American inventors and scientists who got their start working in their garage or basement, Mats saw a problem and set out to fix it—that is, until the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying (EDITORS NOTE: we encourage you to call them on 503-362-2666) brought everything to a screeching halt.

It all started when Mats’s wife received a red-light camera ticket, which sparked Mats’s interest in how exactly yellow lights are timed.

He did a little Googling and found the formula used to set traffic-light times. The length of time a traffic light stays yellow is based on a relatively straightforward mathematical formula, originally drafted in 1959. Mats realized that the formula is incomplete, because it fails to capture the behavior of drivers making right turns. After developing a modified formula and even corresponding with one of the formula’s original creators, Mats started to reach out to others in the scientific community, government officials, and the media.

Mats’s work was generally met with interest and praise, but when Mats e-mailed the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying, things took an abrupt illegal U-turn. The Board told Mats they had no interest in hearing about his ideas. Fair enough. But the Board didn’t stop there. They launched a full-blown investigation, alleging that he’d engaged in the unlicensed “practice of engineering.”

After a two-year-long investigation, the Board fined him $500. According to the Board, “critiquing” the length of yellow lights and talking about his ideas with “members of the public” made Mats a lawbreaker because he’s not an Oregon-licensed professional engineer.

The Board also told Mats that he couldn’t refer to himself using the word “engineer” either. Most people would probably agree that “engineer” is a sensible way to describe Mats, given his education, experience, and skills. (He has a degree in electrical engineering from Sweden, and he’s worked in a range of technical fields for decades).  But in Oregon, none of that matters; the word “engineer” is off-limits to everyone who is not a state-licensed professional engineer.

But now, Mats is fighting back. No matter how technical the topic, the government cannot give state-licensed experts a monopoly on exchanging ideas. Mats isn’t claiming the right to single-handedly change traffic lights himself; he just wants to talk about them.

The government has also stopped people like Mats from truthfully calling themselves “engineers.” Just as the State of Oregon has no monopoly on engineering concepts, it has no monopoly on words (EDITORS NOTE: IN SOME SENSE IT DOES! B.A.R. ATTORNEYS WORLD-WIDE HAVE GIVEN THEMSELVES PERMISSION TO MONOPOLIZE WORDS WITH ALL UPPER CASE DOG LATIN-The Justinian Deception and semantic deception/word magic of “LEGAL DICTIONARIES”; WHICH IS USED IN ALL COURT CASE DEBT “MATTERS” across nearly the whole planet -within the corporations pretending to be “governments”- and relates to using UPPER CASE ARTIFICIAL PERSON CORPORATION “NAMES”, particularly on TOMB STONES GRAVE SITESas death is merely a legal fiction!). That is why Mats has teamed up with the Institute for Justice to ask the federal courts to protect the First Amendment rights of all Oregonians to speak freely about whatever they want. It’s time for Oregon to give free speech the green light.


STATE OF OREGON – OREGON REVISED STATUTES – GSCW Analysis

In the Oregon Legislature – glossary of LEGAL TERMS,

“Chief engineer” or “engineer” means the person designated by the director under ORS 184.628 (Chief engineer).

Person

First, click the link on person.  There is no definition related to human being ANYWHERE in the glossary definition for “PERSON”.  The closest thing there could be is an “INDIVIDUAL”; which is another name for TAXPAYER and thus Artificial person -by code definition in this link-.  When

The closest definition for INDIVIDUAL in Oregon Revised Statutes related to human being  is as a NATURAL PERSON, but this then relies on the recursive definition of PERSON…  which is a logical fallacy.  A term cannot define itself; even externalized one and/or more layers through COMPOUND DEFINITIONS -another semantic deception of the legal system-.

  1. “Individual” means a natural person. “Individual” includes the estate of an incompetent individual or a deceased individual.”

3. “Individual” means a natural person and includes the guardian of an incompetent individual.
Oregon Legislature 3
See also board, person, uncompensated officer

“INCLUDES” means — A term of limitation! — Ex parte Martinez.

“It is a miserable slavery where the law is vague or uncertain.”
Misera est servitus, ubi jus est vagum aut incertum. – Maxim of law

This means that: In referring to an “INDIVIDUAL” as a NATURAL PERSON, what they mean is the GUARDIAN of an Incompetent Individual (the legal presence artificial person, that one has not yet become executor of); who is also an incompetent “individual.”

By referring to human beings as “INDIVIDUALS” -by semantic deception-, Oregon is making “citizens” legally of unsound mind and incompetent!

 Furthermore, the DEFINITION of INDIVIDUAL references that they are an UNCOMPENSATED OFFICER.  Thus supporting the fact that just simply HAVING a Driver’s License (which the human is the CEO-President-Officer-Authorized Representative (falsely assumed surety) OF the DRIVER’s LICENSE ARTIFICIAL PERSON) REQUIRES Universal Basic Income via Minimum Wage!  Humans have been the UNCOMPENSATED OFFICERs of the ARTIFICIAL PERSON -by criminal fraudulent deceptive assumption- since 1938.  We have every right and responsibility to demand back pay.  The Debt to pay for all this DOES exist…  in the BIRTH CERTIFICATE BANK NOTE INSURANCE FRANCHISE ARTIFICIAL PERSON ACCOUNT.
These unclaimed ARTIFICIAL PERSON BANK ACCOUNTS -worth many millions of dollars if not billions- end up in these 1000 peoples’ hands upon LEGAL FICTIONAL death.  The account numbers are staggering2.588 septendecillion Federal Reserve Notes per last public tally.  This is 2.588 million trillion trillion trillion trillion (which is four trillions stacked in a row).

DIRECTOR

From the OREGON Glossary Term “DIRECTOR”

2015 ORS 184.628¹

Chief engineer

(1) The Director of Transportation, with the approval of the Oregon Transportation Commission, shall appoint a chief engineer. The chief engineer shall be a registered civil engineer and shall be qualified by technical training as well as by practical experience.

(2)The chief engineer may designate persons within the Department of Transportation who have full authority to perform any duty required or permitted by law to be performed by the engineer.

(3)The director may authorize the employment by the chief engineer of such staff engineers, engineering and technical assistants and such other help that in the chief engineer’s judgment may be necessary. Compensation, travel allowance and other expenses shall be fixed by the chief engineer with the approval of the director.

Only the Director of Transportation is allowed to APPOINT registered artificial persons as “chief engineers.”   Then only the “chief engineer” may “designate” “engineer” artificial persons.  The “engineer” entity then only has “registered” debt-insurance to commit “fraudulent and deceptive commerce.”  The “engineers” are authorized, meaning they can issued JUDGEMENT ORDERS to CREATE DEBT FROM NOTHING on behalf of the “chief engineer.”

The CHIEF ENGINEER is allowed to FIX THE BOOKS.  That is to say: FIX is another word for MANIPULATE, RIG, CONSPIRACY.

A JUDGEMENT ORDER is a very specific type of NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT DEBT that allows them to just simply CREATE it from nothing and count it as REVENUE!  They even refer to creating judgements and orders by authorization right there in the Oregon Revised Statutes.

Conclusion

This appears to be extortion by the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying.  They have no right nor claim -even as the code is written- to usurp the word “engineer” in such ways.  Feel free to contact and/or call them on 503-362-2666 and give them a piece of our mind.  If you record the conversation, please say so in the beginning, and send me the audio.  My contact info is in the About Page.

This is an offense to all engineers planet wide, particularly those in Oregon who now cannot use the term on their resumés until the legal system changes.

These underlings in the Governmental Corporation likely do not know what their ATTORNEYS are doing with their corporation and codes.

One of the most amazing aspects here is that criminalizing basic human “words”, “actions”, and rights is/was done in many other codes and states/statutes as well, such as “Midwifes”, “massage”, “driving”, “dentist”, “doctor”, “teacher”, “sheriff”, “attorney”, etc.  It is almost shocking that the STATE OF OREGON doesn’t start suing/issuing judgement citations to people for using the word “DIRECTOR”!!!!   ROFL!  The Word “Director” is just as “monopolized” as the word “engineer” here.

So why is/was Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying issuing warrants against the OREGON TREASURY for the word “engineer” rather than word “director”?  It seems that the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying is trying to PUNISH people who do their jobs better than them!  ROFL!  #sad-and-true.

Attorneys try to say that “unlicensed practice of legal statutes is illegal” which may be true because only attorneys have access to the COPYRIGHTED STATUTES and their “execution”, however it is NOT UNLAWFUL.   ATTORNEYS -in FACT- do not have any legislative standing in courts.  ATTORNEYS ARE PRACTICING CRIMINAL ACTS and allowed to get away with it by having FRAUDULENT DEBT INSURANCE.

I have attempted to gain remedy through these DEBT INSURANCE instruments and even with legitimate claims and PROVEN EVIDENCE, all claims are denied…

Insurance is merely an act to rationalize The State’s criminal behavior.

This -AGAIN- goes to show that the criminal UNITED STATES, INC needs to be treated as the FORECLOSED BANKRUPT TERMINATED corporation that they no longer can fraudulently present themselves as.  The APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE is totally done.  the UNITED STATES, INC is not about justice, it is about DEBT and not being liable for their own crimes.

Lastly, Oregon and the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying is foreclose by U.C.C. File Documents #2012127810, 2012127854, 2012127907 and 2012127914, unrebutted.  They do not have any copyright on the terms “chief engineer” nor “engineer” any more.  Such is the nature of foreclosure.


Besides making our voices heard, what else can be done about the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying?  Rather than sue the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying GENERAL COUNSEL BAR ATTORNEYS -whom are LITERALLY in cahoots with the BAR ATTORNEY JUDGES and DEFENSE ATTORNEYS (as all BAR ATTORNEYS WORK FOR THE COURT FIRST AND FOREMOST; before the client)-…

How about this as a solution to the clear and obvious corporate criminal behavior by public officials in the UNITED STATES, INC?

Wells Fargo Directors Face Wrath for Complicity In Bank Corruption

Wells Fargo Directors Face Wrath for Complicity In Bank Corruption

Board of directors dealt low-confidence vote, met with fierce protests in and outside of annual shareholder meeting

Met by fierce protests both inside and out the annual shareholder meeting in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida on Tuesday, members of the Wells Fargo board of directors refused to step down despite expressions of outrage and no confidence for their handling of a massive consumer banking scam.

The meeting marked the first for shareholders since the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) last September exposed the bank for opening millions of unauthorized accounts, which saddled many customers with fees and blemishes on their credit score, all in the name of meeting unrealistic sales quotas.

The massive scandal and fallout led to the resignation of former CEO John Stumpf and Tuesday’s meeting was expected to be the moment that the directors would be held to account.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) issued a series of tweets during the three-hour long meeting, advising those voting to demand accountability.

Inside the meeting, multiple shareholders stood up to express anger at the directors.

The New York Post reports:

During the first minutes of the meeting, shareholder Bruce Marks of the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America spurred mayhem as he demanded that board members to stand up and tell investors what they knew and when they knew it about the scandal […]

“Let them speak! Let them speak! Or are they just mouthpieces for the executives who allowed these predatory practices to occur?” Marks said.  [Chairman Stephen] Sanger tried to get Marks to sit down and wait until a specific Q&A session, telling him he was “out of order.” […]

“Wells Fargo has been out of order for years, and your response is, ‘Well, we’re sorry,'” Marks yelled. “Well, that’s not good enough!”

Sister Nora Nash, director of corporate responsibility for the Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia, also denounced the board, saying they “failed to set the tone and the culture” that it should have, according to NBC News.

At one point, shareholders introduced a motion to break up the banking giant. Rachel Curley, democracy associate with the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said of the request: “One of the key arguments for reducing the size of Wells Fargo… is that the bank is too big to manage. The massive cross-selling fraud attests to this problem.”

Another proposal which recommended the bank drop its funding of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) was also tabled. “You can drink water. You can’t drink oil,” Robert Taken Alive, a member of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Council, said during the meeting. “We’re looking for action. We’re not looking for policy or paper.”

Outside the meeting, campaigners held a day of action to draw attention to the “corrupt and unethical business practices” of the bank—from an overnight anti-pipeline protest at a New York City location to a flyover banner above the Florida meeting, which drew attention to Wells Fargo executive Jeff Grubb’s support for an anti-LGBT extremist group. Others took to Twitter to express their outrage with the banking giant, using the hashtag #ForgoWells.

“Around the country, people are saying that we’ve had enough of Wells Fargo really doing everything it can to extract as much value out of our communities as possible, and we’re fighting back,” Saqib Bhatti, director of the ReFund America Project who also is working on the Forgo Wells campaign, told CounterSpinrecently, explaining that the campaign “is really about getting cities, states, counties, school districts across the country to stop doing business with Wells Fargo.”

In addition to the day of action, Forgo Wells is circulating a petition that, Bhatti explained, “calls on the bank to divest from Dakota Access Pipeline, to stop investing in private prisons and immigration detention centers, to stop funding the payday lending industry, to stop its tremendous lobbying that it’s doing to try to influence our politics, to stop its predatory foreclosure practices, and a number of other demands that we raise.”

Ultimately, “all but three of the directors received less than 81 percent of the shares cast, with risk committee chairman Enrique Hernandez Jr. receiving the lowest tally, 53 percent,” reported Deon Roberts and Rick Rothacker with the Charlotte Observer‘s “Bank Watch,” who described the vote as “a strong rebuke.”

“It’s extremely rare for corporate directors to be voted out or even to have a poor showing in annual shareholder votes,” they noted. “Running unopposed, they typically receive voting percentages in the high 90s.” Chairman Sanger only received 56 percent. The three directors who fared well were all hired in the wake of the scandal.

The embattled board seemed to hold on with the help of Warren Buffett, whose company Berkshire Hathaway owns about 10 percent of shares.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Cops Detain Entire School, Illegally Search/Grope 900 Kids — Find NOTHING, Parents Furious

Cops Detain Entire School, Illegally Search/Grope 900 Kids — Find NOTHING, Parents Furious

By Matt Agorist

Worth County, GA — Children feel violated, parents are furious, and a lawsuit is getting filed after the Worth County Sheriff’s office conducted an illegal search of 900 students — in the name of the war on drugs. The rights-violating intrusive and aggressive patdowns and drug dog searches yielded absolutely nothing.

On April 14, when the students of Worth County High School returned from spring break, they arrived at school to find a police state had taken over. The sheriff and his deputies — with no probable cause — detained and illegally searched every single child in the school, all 900 of them.

When kids went home that day to tell their parents what happened, naturally, they were furious as it is a gross violation of the children’s 4th Amendment rights.

“It’s essentially a fourth amendment violation,” said attorney Mark Begnaud. “It’s 900 illegal searches, suspicion-less pat downs, suspicion-less searches.”

Naturally, Sheriff Jeff Hobby is standing by this rights violation on a massive scale, noting that as long as a school administrator was present, the search of the children was legal.

Apparently, in the sheriff’s mind, school administrators can usurp the constitutional rights of children in favor of unlawful police searches.

But school officials and the student rule book disagree.

In the student handbook, it says school officials may search a student only if there is reasonable suspicion the student has an illegal item.

As WALB reports, Worth County Schools attorney Tommy Coleman said in order for the Sheriff’s office to search any students, they’d had to have reason to believe there was some kind of criminal activity or the student had possession of contraband or drugs.

“If you don’t have that then this search would violate an individual’s rights,” said Coleman. “[It] violates the constitutional right and enforcing them the right against unreasonable search and seizures.”

Interim Worth County Superintendent Lawrence Walters said he understands parents concerns about the drug search at Worth County High school on Friday, according to WALB.

“I’ve never been involved with anything like that ever in the past 21 years and I don’t condone it,” said Walters.

Walters said he was notified that there was be a search but pointed out that he did not give permission nor did he approve the mass groping of children.

“We did not give permission but they didn’t ask for permission, he just said, the sheriff, that he was going to do it after spring break,” said Walters.

“Under no circumstances did we approve touching any students,”explained Walters.

Adding insult to injury, many students complained that they got far more than just a pat down.

At least one deputy’s searches were found to be “too intrusive.”

According to Hobby, it was later discovered that one of the deputies had exceeded instructions given by Hobby and conducted a pat down of some students that was considered to be too intrusive.

When multiple students complained about being groped by the intrusive deputy, Sheriff Hobby ensured parents and school officials that “corrective action was taken to make sure the behavior will not be repeated.”

Exactly who that cop was and what ‘corrective action’ was taken, remains a mystery.

“I’m okay with them doing the search, if it was done appropriately like the school has done in the past,” said father of two Jonathan Luke. “But when they put their hands on my son, that’s crossing the line.”

Aside from not finding a single bit of contraband, the sheriff’s search was also entirely uncalled for as the Sylvester Police Department did a search on March 17 — just a few weeks before — and found no drugs.

But Hobby told reporters he didn’t think that search was thorough enough, so he decided to do his own. And, this time, he’d grope every student.

Now, many of the parents are planning a lawsuit against the Sheriff’s office which will likely be the only means of holding this man and his department accountable.

As for the 900 counts of deprivation of rights under the color of law that the sheriff should be facing, not a single charge has been levied against the department.

This is what school has become in a police state.

WALB.com, South Georgia News, Weather, Sports

Matt Agorist is the co-founder of TheFreeThoughtProject.com, where this article first appeared. He is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Follow @MattAgorist. and now on Steemit

Venezuela On The Verge Of Revolution: A Quick Overview

Venezuela On The Verge Of Revolution: A Quick Overview

By James Holbrooks

Venezuela, a country with only $10 billion left in reserves to run on, is in trouble. The people are starving. The government has gone full-on authoritarian, and now desperate human beings are dying in the streets.

From an Associated Press report on Friday:

Authorities in Venezuela say 12 people were killed overnight following looting and violence in the South American nation’s capital amid a spiraling political crisis.

Continuing, the report further highlighted the gravity of the situation:

Most of the deaths took place in El Valle, where opposition leaders say 13 people were hit with an electrical current while trying to loot a bakery protected by an electric fence.

These are people without options, forced to turn to thievery to stay alive. And they died because of it.

On April 6, The Economist reported that over the past year, 74 percent of Venezuelans lost an average of 20 pounds. Venezuela, incidentally, has topped Bloomberg’s Economic Misery Index for the past three years.

The country began its slide downward into chaos with the election of President Nicolas Maduro, who immediately began implementing socialist programs and has since taken extreme measures to secure his position.

At the end of March, for instance, Maduro effectively shut down Venezuela’s congress — his primary political opposition — and gave those legislative duties to his puppet Supreme Court.

The latest news coming out of the South American nation — aside from the deaths of people trying to steal bread to live — is that General Motors, whose Venezuelan production facility was overtaken by local authorities, has now ceased all operations in the country.

To put that in perspective, consider that in 2016, only 3,000 vehicles were sold in Venezuela, a country of 30 million people.

The U.S. Southern Command has floated the idea of using the United States’ military to contain unrest in Venezuela, though historically American intervention in South America is both widely unpopular in the region and wildly unsuccessful.

As we look on at the continuing horrors in the Middle East and what seems, at the moment, to be the makings of World War III in Asia, let’s not lose sight of the fact that right now, the people of Venezuela are in pain.

Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo