USCode Proves All U.S., Inc Child Support Orders are Pre-Paid by the Court

NOW, THEREFORE, THE UNDERSIGNED ARBITRATOR…. Arbitrators determine remedy in these unconstitutional courts. Not a jury of peers.

There are so many children harmed in family separations in the UNITED STATES, INC. One of the many harmful aspects is when one parent does not and/or cannot pay for Child Support.  From stories I have heard from friends, these courts tend to PRE-position themselves as the man is “wrong” and “harmful” with a severe anti-masculine bias.

The courts likely do this to stop any direct action that men tend perform as negative to access to their children.  That itself was very disturbing a psychological pattern of the court agents/officers and agencies.

One way that we would put our foot down for the betterment of child, the betterment of our ex’s, the betterment of the situation, and even the betterment of the court, is to READ THIS ONE LAW:

Title 28 U.S. Code §1738B – Full faith and credit.

Full Faith and Credit is a term of art and is underwriting.  Anything that requires the FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE UNITED STATES is a debt negotiable instrument worth itself as an accounting line item.

(b)DEFINITIONS.In this section:
  (1)The term “child” means—
    (A) a person under 18 years of age; and
(B) a person 18 or more years of age with respect to whom a child support order has been issued pursuant to the laws of a State.

Clearly, a “child” means a legal “PERSON” -which means an artificial corporate trade name insurance franchise.

Also, We find that Child Support Orders are Issued, as in like negotiable instruments are ORDERED and ISSUED, by U.C.C. Article 3 – Negotiable Instruments § 3-104 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT and § 3-105 ISSUE OF INSTRUMENT.

Compounding, we next see that all these WORDS in the “LEGAL CODE” are UPPER CASE, pointing to DOG LATIN, BASTARDIZED ENGLISH – The Justinian Deception.

(2) The term “child’s State” means the State in which a child resides.

This translates into The Child is Property of the State because they have a LEGAL FICTIONAL PRESENCE that “resides” in the DC Municipal Corporation of THE STATE.  The child is property of the State.  We see how this is true in the full disclosure meaning of a MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE.

All the human rights abuses that occur by U.S. Child Protective Services is all the reason to have them completely shut down forever.  Those “agencies” are kidnapping for profit, no joke.

(4)The term “child support” means a payment of money, continuing support, or arrearages or the provision of a benefit (including payment of health insurance, child care, and educational expenses) for the support of a child.

We know that MONEY means LEGAL TENDER via Title 31 U.S.C. §5103, and the Washtenaw County PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND Insurance Coverage Documentation.

(5)The term “child support order”—
  (A) means a judgment, decree, or order of a court requiring the payment of child support in periodic amounts or in a lump sum; and
  (B)includes—
    (i) a permanent or temporary order; and
    (ii) an initial order or a modification of an order.

Another name for an “Order of a Court” is called a WARRANT.  An “order of a Court” is literally a “Money” Order -by U.C.C. Article 3 -Negotiable Instruments!

According to the State of Washington Department of Treasury:

A warrant — or check — is a legal, negotiable instrument drawn against the state treasury in place of a commercial bank. State agencies disburse funds to vendors or other payees by issuing warrants from the state treasury that bear the State Treasurer’s unique Routing Number and are signed by the State Treasurer.

Because the responsibility for authorizing and producing warrants resides with individual state agencies, inquiries about a payment made by a state agency should be directed to the issuing agency.

The Child Support Order is an order of the Court (the state agency) disbursing funds (child support money order checks) to vendors (contestants/defendants/plaintiffs) by issuing (28 U.S.C. § 1738B) a warrant (the child support order) from the state treasury.  Every Child Support Order has the State Treasurer’s unique Routing Numbers attached.

The authority for issuing debt against the “STATE STATUTORY CITIZENS” and producing warrants (child support money orders) resides with the highly unconstitutional family courtrooms (which are NOT courts; as they are merely administrative bankers offices).

(6)The term “contestant” means—
  (A)a person (including a parent) who—
    (i) claims a right to receive child support;
    (ii) is a party to a proceeding that may result in the issuance of a child support order; or
    (iii)  is under a child support order; and
  (B) a State or political subdivision of a State to which the right to obtain child support has been assigned.

This section of the legal code is highly disturbing.  It calls everyone a CONTESTANT, as if the child’s life were some kind of fictional game.

Furthermore, the state has the authority to pay itself for anything it deems reasonable no matter how unreasonable.  There does not seem to be any recourse to criminality in the system designed into the legal code here.  The State seems to be enabling itself to issue unlimited amounts of debt to itself against the “STATUTORY CITIZENS” of the state.

(7)The term “court” means a court or administrative agency of a State that is authorized by State law to establish the amount of child support payable by a contestant or make a modification of a child support order.

A “court” refers to a “real” common law court that simply does not exist in the UNITED STATES, INC.   so “court” was crossed out for clarity purposes.  These “family courtrooms” are ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES!!!  They have no lawful “judicial” jurisdiction.

We move out of DEFINITIONS into other Processes and Arrangements.

(c) Requirements of Child Support Orders.A child support order made by a court of a State is made consistently with this section if—
  (1) a court that makes the order, pursuant to the laws of the State in which the court is located and subsections (e), (f), and (g)—
    (A) has subject matter jurisdiction to hear the matter and enter such an order; and
    (B) has personal jurisdiction over the contestants; and
  (2) reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard is given to the contestants.

Court of a State does not have jurisdiction to ENTER such a MONEY ORDER, however, if it does, the court is simply issuing   a debt ON BEHALF OF THE CONTESTANT!!!!   It is the Contestants job to deposit the CHILD SUPPORT MONEY ORDER IN THE BANK…  the funds are literally drawn against the STATE TREASURY DEBT UNDERWRITING FACILITY -as documented by the STATE OF WASHINGTON – TREASURY.

The word PERSONal -is in “PERSONAL JURISDICTION”- refers to the artificial corporation person.  PERSON is another name for an INSURANCE FRANCHISE of operating a HUMAN BEING within their fraudulent legal fictional debt slavery system.

(f)RECOGNITION OF CHILD SUPPORT ORDERS..

This entire section refers to “ISSUING” warrant money orders against the State Treasury 10 times.

(h) CHOICE OF LAW.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—
In a proceeding to establish, modify, or enforce a child support order, the forum State’s law shall apply except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3).

(2) LAW OF STATE OF ISSUANCE OF ORDER.—
In interpreting a child support order including the duration of current payments and other obligations of support, a court shall apply the law of the State of the court that issued the order.

(3) PERIOD OF LIMITATIONS.—
In an action to enforce arrears under a child support order, a court shall apply the statute of limitation of the forum State or the State of the court that issued the order, whichever statute provides the longer period of limitation.

First, CHOICE OF LAW refers to the fact that Family Courts are ENTIRELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL and that using a Family Court is ENTIRELY the choice of the contestants.

Second, IN GENERAL refers to the Family Courtroom as a MILITARY PROCEEDING.  They have Gold Fringed Flags meaning statutory commercial military.

Third, the Family Courtroom is referred to as merely a FORUM for STATE’S “legal code.”  And yes, there you have in folks, in their own words.

Next, “a court shall apply the law of the State of the court that issued the order.”  Here is definitive evidence that the LAW OF STATE OF ISSUANCE OF ORDER is a CHOICE OF LAW.  It is not REQUIRED to be followed…  it can only be followed voluntarily.  Again, they issued these negotiable instruments for out benefit, so we need to use them.

and lastly, “a court shall apply the statute of limitation of the forum State or the State of the court that issued the order…” means that we only have a limited amount of time to collect the state issued warrant to pay for the child support.

HOW TO TENDER A CHILD SUPPORT MONEY ORDER

If you have an attorney, you may ask and they are required by law to tell you how to do it.  If they don’t and/or they can’t, their legal incompetence is no excuse.  Either Attorneys are knowingly committing these scams or their are criminally negligent of the scam the courts are committing.

Next, Get a copy of the CHILD SUPPORT MONEY ORDER.  It can be tendered with ANY of the following institutions:

  • any Federal Reserve Bank
  • the State Treasury
  • any bill (which they are required to return the over payment).
  • and with the ISSUING FAMILY COURT.

These should be made via U.C.C. Article 3 Negotiable Instruments – §3-501 PRESENTMENT.  This is done the same way as depositing any “check” as every check is a “warrant” if it came from the state!

To deposit a CHILD SUPPORT MONEY ORDER, sign the back:

without prejudice, all rights reserved
by:/s/   (your autograph)©/, in propria persona
(first)-(m.i./middle): (last name), in propria persona, American National, authorized representative U.C.C. 3-402b1

All these autograph additions are important BTW.  If you don’t know them, you should.

“without prejudice” means that the government corporation cannot apply codes that you haven’t explicitly agreed to.

“all rights reserved” means that your basic human rights are not waived for any reason.

“by:/s/” means that you are a living breathing human being.  placing your signature before an “X:” means that one is deceased.

“©” always copyright ones signature as it is the copyrighted artwork that makes debt worth anything, according to law.  and Attorneys use WITH PREJUDICE to steal the signature artwork on WARRANTS such as explicitly as Family Courts do!

“in propria persona” means that one is signing “in our proper human-identity.”

Lawful names are formatted NOT in upper case.  UPPER CASE NAMES are reserved for legal fictions.  so the name JOHN QUINCY DOE would become john-quincy: doe.

Finally “authorized representative U.C.C. 3-402b1” has so much importance in cannot even be described with words.  This means that you -as the human being- are not responsible for the debts of the ARTIFICIAL PERSON CONTESTANT.

Why this is important is that all CHILD SUPPORT ORDER is issued against the ARTIFICIAL PERSON CONTESTANT.  But the warrants-orders are also worth the debt they claim on them.  So, being the authorized representative of the warrant means that the ARTIFICIAL PERSON is liable for “paying it” rather than the Human Authorized Representative.

Put another way, The ARTIFICIAL PERSON CONTESTANT is a second you.  It is a corporation that is designed to Represent you within their LEGAL FICTIONAL game.  They even call people CONTESTANTS like a game.  The second corporate “you” is a trade name.   It acts in DEBT COMMERCE so you don’t have to.  Their ARTIFICIAL PERSON represents you within THEIR legal debt slavery system.

Being AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE means that they court CANNOT hold anything but the ARTIFICIAL PERSON accountable for the DEBT…  and issuing debt is very very easy.  Anyone can issue any amount they want.  Debt is just an accounting line item.

So, call the courtrooms out.  Call the Attorneys out of their scam.  Make a U.C.C. Article 3 § 3-501 Presentment of the CHILD SUPPORT MONEY ORDER to the FORUM of STATE LAW.

The FAMILY COURTROOM FORUM OF STATE LAW created the debt, they are liable for it…   for the benefit of your child.

Marriage Licenses: The Real Truth about Marriage Certificates

The nature of MARRIAGE LICENSES in this article applies to EVERY nation operating as a CORPORATION with BAR Attorneys.

And congratulations to all LGBTQx: we have won the right for non-sexual ARTIFICIAL PERSON CORPORATE TRADE NAMES to now form a business “partner”-ship (of state) together for the benefit of the corporation pretending to be a government.

These “marriage licenses” are merely debt insurance products enabling the STATE CORPORATION to create as much debt-money-tender from the negotiable instrument as possible…  and in the process steal our relationship energies!  That’s why relationship become noticeable more difficult after marriage….  the STATE CORPORATION is draining the relationship energy by being a third party, and acting uncaringly (rehypothecating the debt to near unlimited amounts) -quite literally- against the other two parties to the marriage license contract; parties that are mere artificial person corporations for being UPPER CASE NAMES.

Marriage Licenses: The Real Truth about Marriage Certificates

Marriage Licenses: The Real Truth
by Virgil Cooper ultrac21@whitemtns.com

Distributed under Fair Use for documenting what a (Same Sex) MARRIAGE LICENSE is and looks like: a Bank Note

Enlightening Conversation with a Marriage License Bureau….

About 15 years ago, my former wife of 26½ years, filed for divorce. We had seven (7) children: five (5) daughters and two (2) sons. Our youngest at the time, our second son, was five years old. At the time, I prepared a counterclaim to the Petition for Dissolution her attorney filed in Domestic Relations (DR) court.

I met one afternoon with the head of the Maricopa County Superior Court, Marriage License Bureau, in downtown Phoenix. The marriage license bureau was headed by a young woman of about age 25. I asked her to explain to me the general and statutory implications of the marriage license. She was very cooperative, and called in an Assistant, a tall Black man who at the time was working on an Operations Manual for internal departmental use.

She deferred for most technical explanations to her Assistant. He walked through the technicalities of the marriage license as it operates in Arizona. He mentioned that marriage licensing is pretty much the same in the other states — but there are differences. One significant difference he mentioned was that Arizona is one of eight western states that are Community Property states. The other states are Common Law states, including Utah, with the exception of Louisiana which is a Napoleonic Code state.

He then explained some of the technicalities of the marriage license. He said, first of all, the marriage license is Secular Contract between the parties and the State. The State is the principal party in that Secular Contract. The husband and wife are secondary or inferior parties. The Secular Contract is a three-way contract between the State, as Principal, and the husband and wife as the other two legs of the Contract.

He said, in the traditional sense a marriage is a covenant between the husband and wife and God. But in the Secular Contract with the state, reference to God is a dotted line, and NOT officially considered included in the Secular Contract at all.

He said, if the husband and wife wish to include God as a party in their marriage, that is a “dotted line” they will have to add in their own minds. The state’s marriage license is “strictly secular,” he said. He said further, that what he meant by the relationship to God being a “dotted line” meant that the State regards any mention of God as irrelevant, even meaningless.

In his description of the marriage license contract, the related one other “dotted line.” He said in the traditional religious context, marriage was a covenant between the husband and wife and God with husband and wife joined as one. This is not the case in the secular realm of the state’s marriage license contract. The State is the Principal or dominant party. The husband and wife are merely contractually “joined” as business partners, not in any religious union. They may even be considered, he said, connected to each other by another “dotted line.”

The picture he was trying to “paint” was that of a triangle with the State at the top and a solid line extending from the apex, the State, down the left side to the husband, and a separate solid line extending down the right side to the wife, a “dotted line” merely showing that they consider themselves to have entered into a religious union of some sort that is irrelevant to the State.

Marriage License
Secular Contract Diagram
STATE
(primary party)
HUSBAND WIFE .
(secondary party) (secondary party) .
GOD

He further mentioned that this “religious overtone” is recognized by the State by requiring that the marriage must be solemnized either by a state official or by a minister of religion that has been “deputized” by the State to perform the marriage ceremony and make a return of the signed and executed marriage license to the State.

Again, he emphasized that marriage is a strictly secular relationship so far as the State is concerned and because it is looked upon as a “privileged business enterprise” various tax advantages and other political privileges have become attached to the marriage license contract that have nothing at all to do with marriage as a religious covenant or bond between God and a man and a woman.

By way of reference, if you would like to read a legal treatise on marriage, one of the best is “Principles of Community Property,” by William Defuniak. At the outset, he explains that Community Property law descends from Roman Civil Law through the Spanish Codes, 600 A.D., written by the Spanish juris consults.

In the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a for-profit venture or profit-making venture (even though it may never actually produce a profit in operation) and as the wife goes out to the local market to purchase food stuffs and other supplies for the marriage household, she is replenishing the stocks of the business. To restate: In the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a business venture, that is, a for-profit business venture. Moreover, as children come into the marriage household, the business venture is considered to have “borne fruit.”

Now, back to the explanation by the Maricopa County Superior Court, Marriage Bureau’s administrative Assistant. He went on to explain that every contract must have consideration. The State offers consideration in the form of the actual license itself – the piece of paper, the Certificate of Marriage. The other part of consideration by the State is “the privilege to be regulated by statute.” He added that this privilege to be regulated by statute includes all related statutes,and all court cases as they are ruled on by the courts, and all statutes and regulations into the future in the years following the commencement of the

marriage. He said in a way the marriage license contract is a dynamic or flexible, ever-changing contract as time goes along – even though the husband and wife didn’t realize that.

My thought on this is can it really be considered a true contract as one becomes aware of the failure by the State to make full disclosure of the terms and conditions. A contract must be entered into knowingly, intelligently, intentionally, and with fully informed consent. Otherwise, technically there is no contract.

Another way to look as the marriage license contract with the State is as a contract of adhesion, a contract between two disparate, unequal parties. Again, a flawed “contract.” Such a contract with the State is said to be a “specific performance” contract as to the privileges, duties and responsibilities that attach.

Consideration on the part of the husband and wife is the actual fee paid and the implied agreement to be subject to the state’s statutes, rules, and regulations and all court cases ruled on related to marriage law, family law, children, and property. He emphasized that this contractual consideration by the bride and groom places them in a definite and defined-by-law position inferior and subject to the State. He commented that very few people realize this.

He also said that it is very important to understand that children born to the marriage are considered by law as “the contract bearing fruit” – meaning the children primarily belong to the State, even though the law never comes out and says so in so many words.

In this regard, children born to the contract regarded as “the contract bearing fruit,” he said it is vitally important for parents to understand two doctrines that became established in the United States during the 1930s. The first is the Doctrine of Parens Patriae. The second is the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis.

Parens Patriae means literally “the parent of the country” or to state it more bluntly – the State is the undisclosed true parent. Along this line, a 1930s Arizona Supreme Court case states that parents have no property right in their children, and have custody of their children during good behavior at the sufferance of the State. This means that parents may raise their children and maintain custody of their children as long as they don’t offend the State, but if they in some manner displease the State, the State can step in at any time and exercise its superior status and take custody and control of its children – the parents are only conditional caretakers. [Thus the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis.]

He also added a few more technical details. The marriage license is an ongoing contractual relationship with the State. Technically, the marriage license is a business license allowing the husband and wife, in the name of the marriage, to enter into contracts with third parties and contract mortgages and debts. They can get car loans, home mortgages, and installment debts in the name of the marriage because it is not only a secular enterprise, but it is looked upon by the State as a privileged business enterprise as well as a for-profit business enterprise. The marriage contract acquires property through out its existence and over time, it is hoped, increases in value.

Also, the marriage contract “bears fruit” by adding children. If sometime later, the marriage fails, and a “divorce” results the contract continues in existence. The “divorce” is merely a contractual dissolution or amendment of the terms and

conditions of the contract. Jurisdiction of the State over the marriage, over the husband and wife, now separated, continues and continues over all aspects of the marriage, over marital property and over children brought into the marriage.

That is why family law and the Domestic Relations court calls “divorce” a dissolution of the marriage because the contract continues in operation but in amended or modified form. He also pointed out that the marriage license contract is one of the strongest, most binding contractual relationships the State has on people.

At the end of our hour-long meeting, I somewhat humorously asked if other people had come in and asked the questions I was asking? The Assistant replied that in the several years he had worked there, he was not aware of anyone else asking these questions. He added that he was very glad to see someone interested in the legal implications of the marriage license and the contractual relationship it creates with the State.

His boss, the young woman Marriage Bureau department head stated, “You have to understand that people who come in here to get a marriage license are in heat. The last thing they want to know is technical, legal and statutory implications of the marriage license.”

I hope this is helpful information to anyone interested in getting more familiar with the contractual implications of the marriage license. The marriage license as we know it didn’t come into existence until after the Civil War and didn’t become standard practice in all the states until after 1900, becoming firmly established by 1920. In effect, the states or governments appropriated or usurped control of marriages in secular form and in the process declared Common Law applicable to marriages “abrogated.”

Please pass this information along and share it as widely as possible.

Original message from Virgil Cooper: ultrac21@whitemtns.com

Ron Paul Interviews Julian Assange: “Going After Wikileaks Because They Humiliated the CIA”

Wikileaks is being called a NON-STATE Intelligence Service.  Investigative Journalists investigating Human Right Crimes and analyzing it is called JOURNALISM.

By this new definition of “INTELLIGENCE SERVICES” as meaning “FREEDOM OF SPEECH,”  all news -e.g. Huffington Post, New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times, FOX News, CNN, RT, BBC, Al-Jeezira, etc- are Intelligence Services.

Investigative Journalists publish news publicly and use it for exposing criminal governmental service corporations.

INTELLIGENCE SERVICES keep the news private and use it for their own advantages.

For the reason that these NEWS ORGANIZATIONS, are INCORPORATED within a Parent governmental corporation, e.g. UNITED STATES INC, RUSSIA INC, ENGLAND INC, CHINA INC, etc, then these NEWS ORGANIZATIONS not reporting the full extent of governmental crimes for their own benefit would be thus a STATE INTELLIGENCE SERVICE.

Freedom of Speech -as defined by the Constitution- is about human speech.  However, moving from the Lawful system to the STATUTORY CORPORATE LEGAL FICTIONAL SYSTEM (with their own Incorporated Constitution from 1871, and Statutory Constitution from 1938), the Freedom of Speech has been re-defined as the “right to issue debt”, as per CITIZENS UNITED v F.E.C.  Debt is the only “freedom of speech” that there is within the legal system.  Everything is made into DEBT-EQUITY by attorneys world wide, and they simply assume that Corporate Personhood and/or DEBT can/will protect them from the obviousness of the human rights abuses of what debt actually is: SLAVERY.

The Attorneys for the “News Organizations” State Intelligence Services are provenly primarily working for THE STATE CORPORATION.  For this reason, all NEWS ORGANIZATION ATTORNEYS literally refuse to let anything TOO criminal to come out about attorneys lest it expose their position as colluding to keep news from the public.

Ron Paul Interviews Julian Assange: “Going After Wikileaks Because They Humiliated the CIA”

Mac Slavo    April 28th, 2017

wikileaks-insurance-leak-document-encrypted-si_-e1476470042793

Dr. Ron Paul puts things in perspective – the outlaw Julian Assange, and his often-targeted Wikileaks organization, are not a threat against national security, but an embarrassment to its many shady dealings.

via the Ron Paul Institute:

Wikileaks Founder and Editor-in-Chief Julian Assange joins the Liberty Report to discuss the latest push by the Trump Administration to bring charges against him and his organization for publishing US Government documents. How will they get around the First Amendment and the Espionage Act? The US government and the mainstream media — some of which gladly publish Wikileaks documents — are pushing to demonize Assange in the court of public opinion. Wikileaks is registered as a 501(c)3 organization in the US. Find out more about the organization and how you can help: https://wikileaks.org/

Julian Assange Speaks Out: The War On The Truth

Read more:

Ron Paul Defends Assange: “Don’t Allow This President To Declare War On the Truth”

The Mystery of Wikileaks’ Cryptic “Vault 7”: Do You Know What This Means?

BREAKING: Julian Assange Suggests MURDERED DNC STAFFER Seth Rich Was Wikileaks Source: “We Have To Understand How High The Stakes Are In the United States”

Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.

CPS seizes child after parents challenge ADHD diagnosis

CPS can only “take” children based upon the jurisdiction of the artificial person BIRTH CERTIFICATE.  The child is surety for the JUDGEMENT DEBT ORDER by the Courtroom.

I know attorneys who work in Family Courtrooms.  They say that the Family Courtrooms are the MOST Unconstitutional courts in the Governmental Services Corporation.

Such CPS fraud can only be persisted with the attorney-supported deception/confusion between the ARTIFICIAL PERSON and the human being.

We see here public testimony of the crimes by CPS and why they need to be shuttered immediately for such slavery crimes.

CPS seizes child after parents challenge ADHD diagnosis

Image: CPS seizes child after parents challenge ADHD diagnosis

(Natural News) An Ohio couple, Christian and Katie Maple, lost custody of one of their children after they disagreed with the school’s mental health assessment of their child.

Camden Maple, a seven-year-old boy, has five siblings and enjoys Star Wars, Pokémon, football, video games, and Legos. He loves to write stories and draws comic books. While this sounds like an ordinary, creative, imaginative American little boy who can, according to his mom, be “rambunctious” at times, his school said that he needed mental health help.

While the school diagnosed him with ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder), his parents, who know him better than anyone else, believe that his “rambunctious” actions stem mostly from boredom and not being challenged in the classroom. Camden has been tested a full grade above his current one and often finishes assignments before the rest of the class. When he spends the extra time doodling, Camden gets punished for his creativity.

Does that make him a disobedient or bad child? According to administrators at the public Bowman Primary School in Lebanon, Ohio, it does. They insisted that Camden is “mentally unstable” and needs professional mental health assistance to deal with his disability.

“We as parents do not have the problems the school claims to have with him, at home. We know how to deal with a rambunctious 7 year old, but the school is content with making him believe that he is a bad child; we disagree,” the Maples said.

CPS seizes little boy after a twisted joke at school

Following an incident at school, Christian and Katie were called to pick up their son. He had been a little disruptive in class and told one of the school counselors that he wanted to “erase himself from the earth” because he was a bad kid.

Instead of seeking professional mental health help, the Maples decided to have an extended conversation with their son first, sorting out the issues on a family level. As reported by his parents, there was no reason for concern. During their long talk, Camden explained that he did not want to hurt himself and just said it because he was upset and wanted to see what the counselor would say. His parents added that before this statement, Camden never said anything about harming himself.

The school thinks he is ADHD; we as parents disagree,” the Maples explained. “We believe that it stems mostly from boredom and not being challenged in the classroom. The school has tried on several occasions to get us to have him diagnosed, so that he can be medicated.”

The Maples made suggestions to his teachers about how to handle Camden. They explained that Camden doodles or becomes restless because he is bored, not because he has ADHD. Their comments and suggestions all got ignored, and the school decided to call Child Protective Services (CPS), accusing them of “health neglect.”

After several visits to their home, eight police officers surrounded the couple’s house on March 3, 2017, and took Camden away based on false accusations and ADHD diagnosis. Rather than addressing the issues – by skipping a grade or giving him extra assignments – the CPS abducted a healthy, little boy from his loving family, stamped him with the label of a mental disease, and put him on damaging ADHD medication and mandatory therapy.

Camden never showed any signs of depression or the intention to hurt himself or others. He is just too smart for his age and bored. Nonetheless, the school called the CPS when the Maples did not comply with their demand to get their child diagnosed with ADHD and medicated.

The Maples are still fighting to get their son back and wonder if they fell victim to a money greedy school that wanted funding by having him diagnosed as a special needs child.

Has the world gone mad? Find more twisted news stories at Twisted.news.


Sources include:

thenewamerican.com

healthimpactnews.com/

Math Illegal? Oregon Board criminalizing Freedom of Speech and Unlicensed “Practice of Engineering”

As a “Software Engineer”®©™ (at the Common Law; ®©™ as tongue in cheek), educated in a prestigious American university (equivalent to M.I.T. -by their standards-), working as a “software engineer” for high-end open-source web frameworks, many successful and still operating web projects, having been screwed by “worked for” banks, transnational conglomerate auction houses, fast paced business consulting firms, small business consulting, business development, and “self-employed” (and all of those under false pretenses of what debt as money is and is not; and unconscionable contracts with the UNITED STATES, INC)…  and every one of them hired me based upon the exercise of my (constitutionally) protected freedom of speech to say and write my prior job experience.

Would I be “practicing engineering” by saying and writing that software companies hire me as a “software engineer” without some legalized license to practice?  and without being “designated” as an “engineer”?

How is it that the word “engineer” has been “legalized”/ “legally defined” (which is merely a LEGAL FICTION) such that the statutory codes precludes the right to freedom of speech?

LEGAL FICTIONAn assumption that something occurred or someone or something exists which, in FACT, is not the case, but that is made in the law [merely legalisms of fiction] to enable a court [-room, administrative court, debt collectors] to equitably [by debt!] resolve [because it was already solved] a matter before it. [the matter existed before the debt, making the matter superior to the debt; but in the LEGAL SYSTEM debt is sovereign by definition!]

BTW: Sovereign is legally defined as:    2. In the United States the sovereignty resides in the body of the people. Vide Rutherf. Inst.282.  The “BODY of the PEOPLE” are all ARTIFICIAL PERSON corporations OWNED by the STATE (CORPORATIONS).  The Artificial PERSONS corporations [legal presences that “represent” us in the system] are insurance franchises backed by DEBT.  Birth Certificates make up the TRUST that contain the debt.  The California Vital Records BANK NOTE SPECIALIST has said by phone, “it [the birth certificate] wouldn’t be a BANK NOTE without the BAR CODE!”  So the “BODY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES INCORPORATED” are literally DEBT accounting line items as negotiable instruments via Birth Certificates.  The human body is SURETY for the debt in violation of U.C.C. Article 3-402 (b) (1): “If the form of the signature shows unambiguously that the signature is made on behalf of the represented person who is identified in the instrument, the representative is not liable on the instrument.”  The “represented person”- Person being the key word for the artificial “person” corporation insurance franchise.

Attorneys also go after people for “Unlicensed Practice of Copyrighted LEGAL CODE [they call ‘LAW’]”.  After the Article here, there is an Analysis of the Legal definitions and CODES in Oregon that dives into what makes using the word “engineer” illegal in Oregon.

Illegal Math? Oregon State Board criminalizing speech about traffic lights and unlicensed “practice of engineering”

Running red lights can get you a ticket. But in Oregon, you can be fined just for talking about it.

Mats Järlström learned this first-hand last year when the state of Oregon fined him $500 for publicly suggesting that yellow lights should last for slightly longer to accommodate cars making right turns.

Mats is a tinkerer. In the great tradition of American inventors and scientists who got their start working in their garage or basement, Mats saw a problem and set out to fix it—that is, until the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying (EDITORS NOTE: we encourage you to call them on 503-362-2666) brought everything to a screeching halt.

It all started when Mats’s wife received a red-light camera ticket, which sparked Mats’s interest in how exactly yellow lights are timed.

He did a little Googling and found the formula used to set traffic-light times. The length of time a traffic light stays yellow is based on a relatively straightforward mathematical formula, originally drafted in 1959. Mats realized that the formula is incomplete, because it fails to capture the behavior of drivers making right turns. After developing a modified formula and even corresponding with one of the formula’s original creators, Mats started to reach out to others in the scientific community, government officials, and the media.

Mats’s work was generally met with interest and praise, but when Mats e-mailed the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying, things took an abrupt illegal U-turn. The Board told Mats they had no interest in hearing about his ideas. Fair enough. But the Board didn’t stop there. They launched a full-blown investigation, alleging that he’d engaged in the unlicensed “practice of engineering.”

After a two-year-long investigation, the Board fined him $500. According to the Board, “critiquing” the length of yellow lights and talking about his ideas with “members of the public” made Mats a lawbreaker because he’s not an Oregon-licensed professional engineer.

The Board also told Mats that he couldn’t refer to himself using the word “engineer” either. Most people would probably agree that “engineer” is a sensible way to describe Mats, given his education, experience, and skills. (He has a degree in electrical engineering from Sweden, and he’s worked in a range of technical fields for decades).  But in Oregon, none of that matters; the word “engineer” is off-limits to everyone who is not a state-licensed professional engineer.

But now, Mats is fighting back. No matter how technical the topic, the government cannot give state-licensed experts a monopoly on exchanging ideas. Mats isn’t claiming the right to single-handedly change traffic lights himself; he just wants to talk about them.

The government has also stopped people like Mats from truthfully calling themselves “engineers.” Just as the State of Oregon has no monopoly on engineering concepts, it has no monopoly on words (EDITORS NOTE: IN SOME SENSE IT DOES! B.A.R. ATTORNEYS WORLD-WIDE HAVE GIVEN THEMSELVES PERMISSION TO MONOPOLIZE WORDS WITH ALL UPPER CASE DOG LATIN-The Justinian Deception and semantic deception/word magic of “LEGAL DICTIONARIES”; WHICH IS USED IN ALL COURT CASE DEBT “MATTERS” across nearly the whole planet -within the corporations pretending to be “governments”- and relates to using UPPER CASE ARTIFICIAL PERSON CORPORATION “NAMES”, particularly on TOMB STONES GRAVE SITESas death is merely a legal fiction!). That is why Mats has teamed up with the Institute for Justice to ask the federal courts to protect the First Amendment rights of all Oregonians to speak freely about whatever they want. It’s time for Oregon to give free speech the green light.


STATE OF OREGON – OREGON REVISED STATUTES – GSCW Analysis

In the Oregon Legislature – glossary of LEGAL TERMS,

“Chief engineer” or “engineer” means the person designated by the director under ORS 184.628 (Chief engineer).

Person

First, click the link on person.  There is no definition related to human being ANYWHERE in the glossary definition for “PERSON”.  The closest thing there could be is an “INDIVIDUAL”; which is another name for TAXPAYER and thus Artificial person -by code definition in this link-.  When

The closest definition for INDIVIDUAL in Oregon Revised Statutes related to human being  is as a NATURAL PERSON, but this then relies on the recursive definition of PERSON…  which is a logical fallacy.  A term cannot define itself; even externalized one and/or more layers through COMPOUND DEFINITIONS -another semantic deception of the legal system-.

  1. “Individual” means a natural person. “Individual” includes the estate of an incompetent individual or a deceased individual.”

3. “Individual” means a natural person and includes the guardian of an incompetent individual.
Oregon Legislature 3
See also board, person, uncompensated officer

“INCLUDES” means — A term of limitation! — Ex parte Martinez.

“It is a miserable slavery where the law is vague or uncertain.”
Misera est servitus, ubi jus est vagum aut incertum. – Maxim of law

This means that: In referring to an “INDIVIDUAL” as a NATURAL PERSON, what they mean is the GUARDIAN of an Incompetent Individual (the legal presence artificial person, that one has not yet become executor of); who is also an incompetent “individual.”

By referring to human beings as “INDIVIDUALS” -by semantic deception-, Oregon is making “citizens” legally of unsound mind and incompetent!

 Furthermore, the DEFINITION of INDIVIDUAL references that they are an UNCOMPENSATED OFFICER.  Thus supporting the fact that just simply HAVING a Driver’s License (which the human is the CEO-President-Officer-Authorized Representative (falsely assumed surety) OF the DRIVER’s LICENSE ARTIFICIAL PERSON) REQUIRES Universal Basic Income via Minimum Wage!  Humans have been the UNCOMPENSATED OFFICERs of the ARTIFICIAL PERSON -by criminal fraudulent deceptive assumption- since 1938.  We have every right and responsibility to demand back pay.  The Debt to pay for all this DOES exist…  in the BIRTH CERTIFICATE BANK NOTE INSURANCE FRANCHISE ARTIFICIAL PERSON ACCOUNT.
These unclaimed ARTIFICIAL PERSON BANK ACCOUNTS -worth many millions of dollars if not billions- end up in these 1000 peoples’ hands upon LEGAL FICTIONAL death.  The account numbers are staggering2.588 septendecillion Federal Reserve Notes per last public tally.  This is 2.588 million trillion trillion trillion trillion (which is four trillions stacked in a row).

DIRECTOR

From the OREGON Glossary Term “DIRECTOR”

2015 ORS 184.628¹

Chief engineer

(1) The Director of Transportation, with the approval of the Oregon Transportation Commission, shall appoint a chief engineer. The chief engineer shall be a registered civil engineer and shall be qualified by technical training as well as by practical experience.

(2)The chief engineer may designate persons within the Department of Transportation who have full authority to perform any duty required or permitted by law to be performed by the engineer.

(3)The director may authorize the employment by the chief engineer of such staff engineers, engineering and technical assistants and such other help that in the chief engineer’s judgment may be necessary. Compensation, travel allowance and other expenses shall be fixed by the chief engineer with the approval of the director.

Only the Director of Transportation is allowed to APPOINT registered artificial persons as “chief engineers.”   Then only the “chief engineer” may “designate” “engineer” artificial persons.  The “engineer” entity then only has “registered” debt-insurance to commit “fraudulent and deceptive commerce.”  The “engineers” are authorized, meaning they can issued JUDGEMENT ORDERS to CREATE DEBT FROM NOTHING on behalf of the “chief engineer.”

The CHIEF ENGINEER is allowed to FIX THE BOOKS.  That is to say: FIX is another word for MANIPULATE, RIG, CONSPIRACY.

A JUDGEMENT ORDER is a very specific type of NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT DEBT that allows them to just simply CREATE it from nothing and count it as REVENUE!  They even refer to creating judgements and orders by authorization right there in the Oregon Revised Statutes.

Conclusion

This appears to be extortion by the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying.  They have no right nor claim -even as the code is written- to usurp the word “engineer” in such ways.  Feel free to contact and/or call them on 503-362-2666 and give them a piece of our mind.  If you record the conversation, please say so in the beginning, and send me the audio.  My contact info is in the About Page.

This is an offense to all engineers planet wide, particularly those in Oregon who now cannot use the term on their resumés until the legal system changes.

These underlings in the Governmental Corporation likely do not know what their ATTORNEYS are doing with their corporation and codes.

One of the most amazing aspects here is that criminalizing basic human “words”, “actions”, and rights is/was done in many other codes and states/statutes as well, such as “Midwifes”, “massage”, “driving”, “dentist”, “doctor”, “teacher”, “sheriff”, “attorney”, etc.  It is almost shocking that the STATE OF OREGON doesn’t start suing/issuing judgement citations to people for using the word “DIRECTOR”!!!!   ROFL!  The Word “Director” is just as “monopolized” as the word “engineer” here.

So why is/was Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying issuing warrants against the OREGON TREASURY for the word “engineer” rather than word “director”?  It seems that the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying is trying to PUNISH people who do their jobs better than them!  ROFL!  #sad-and-true.

Attorneys try to say that “unlicensed practice of legal statutes is illegal” which may be true because only attorneys have access to the COPYRIGHTED STATUTES and their “execution”, however it is NOT UNLAWFUL.   ATTORNEYS -in FACT- do not have any legislative standing in courts.  ATTORNEYS ARE PRACTICING CRIMINAL ACTS and allowed to get away with it by having FRAUDULENT DEBT INSURANCE.

I have attempted to gain remedy through these DEBT INSURANCE instruments and even with legitimate claims and PROVEN EVIDENCE, all claims are denied…

Insurance is merely an act to rationalize The State’s criminal behavior.

This -AGAIN- goes to show that the criminal UNITED STATES, INC needs to be treated as the FORECLOSED BANKRUPT TERMINATED corporation that they no longer can fraudulently present themselves as.  The APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE is totally done.  the UNITED STATES, INC is not about justice, it is about DEBT and not being liable for their own crimes.

Lastly, Oregon and the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying is foreclose by U.C.C. File Documents #2012127810, 2012127854, 2012127907 and 2012127914, unrebutted.  They do not have any copyright on the terms “chief engineer” nor “engineer” any more.  Such is the nature of foreclosure.

UPDATE 2017.04.28
OPEN LETTER to the
Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying

Subject: The Common Law Copyright & Trademark on the word “ENGINEER” in Oregon
From: belisoful
April 26th, 2017
Namaste!
I recently heard about you and your office criminalizing freedom of speech and “practice of engineering.”  I am a concerned Software Engineer, Private Attorney General, and Human Rights Inspector General for the World Government operated by WSA in Washington, DC for the whole planet of Earth, in this sector of space-time and galaxy.
This is YOUR CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE that I, ———————-©, in propria persona, world citizen, own the COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT and COMMON LAW TRADE MARK on the word “chief engineer” and “engineer” in the COMMON LAW territory of Oregon, and your offices are violating my protected COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARKE.  This is your CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE to immediately CEASE AND DESIST all claims and actions defending such claims upon BASIC HUMAN WORDS.  This is your CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE to immediately CEASE AND DESIST all color of law operations as per the appended WRIT MANDAMUS.   This is your CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE that NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT; NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL.
Your offices have 10 business days to terminate all fraudulent, criminal, deceptive practices and legal suits, which is all actions, operations, and performances.  Failure to do so shall result in EXTREME PREJUDICE as the Natural Law as a result, a reflection, and a consequence of refusing to acknowledge this LETTER and the FORECLOSURE OF THE UNITED STATES, INCORPORATED for being a crime body in exactly the way your office seems to be acting..  I nor anyone else may cause harm except by and through the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying upon themselves by Karma/Natural Law.
If your offices do Not immediately ceases and desist within 10 business days, please provide the authority and jurisdiction your agency has to cite STATUTORY CODE upon human beings regardless of “legal presence corporations”.
Please notify the GENERAL COUNSEL of this email and its contents, as he/she is engaging in willful slavery and GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, including and not limited to via U.C.C. File Documents 2012127810, 2012127854, 2012127907, and 2012127914 (“these U.C.C. Filings), unrebutted.  These U.C.C. Filings FORECLOSE upon the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying.  If your office desires to continue operating past 10 business days, without DISHONOR, please provide the U.C.C. Filed Rebuttal to these U.C.C. Filings. to this email address.
Furthermore, I am including an audio recording of the MICHIGAN WASHTENAW COUNTY PROSECUTOR claiming that Attorneys works for the UNITED NATIONS.  Your offices are required by 5 U.S.C. 552a to provide who are master’s of the attorneys your offices are using to sue “MATS JÄRLSTRÖM”, representing mats: järlström.  If your General Counsel works for the UNITED NATIONS as per EVERY COUNTY PROSECUTOR -as evidenced by the audio recording of Brian Mackie-, what jurisdiction do you have to be operating in the TERRITORY OF OREGON in violation of Title 4 U.S.C. §72 providing: All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law.”   By Law, you are required to render your codes that expressly provide you, your offices, and co-conspirators authority to sit in the Territory of Oregon rather than District of Columbia!  I have included another audio from Judy Kramer, Risk Manager for Washtenaw County, claiming that public officials people DO KNOW the difference between the TERRITORY and the CORPORATION called STATE OF OREGON which is not OREGON STATE!  And ignorance of the law is NO excuse!
Lastly, I am including the PUBLIC OFFICIAL QUESTIONNAIRE for your office and agents to PRINT; then have MARI LOPEZ, JENN GILBERT, ERIC ENGELSON, KEITH VAN NORMAN, SANTIAGO PUENTE, ROB SOBOTKA, SHAWN THORNHILL, and all BAR ATTORNEY COUNSEL (e.g. General Counsel, office of corporate Counsel, etc) fill out the form, Sign it, Scan it in digital format, and send each copy to me and mats järlström within the next 3 business days to ensure that your offices are operating the legal code without violations.
It is a pleasure conducting business with you.

By Signing Below I certify:
– I am competent and authorized to be making these statements.
– I am competent to handle my affairs.  (AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH)
– I am no citizen, national and resident but a registered and declared World Citizen of the World Government of World Citizens.
– Any court matter must be settled in an International Court of and at
The Common Law and only The Common Law with a jury of private non-lienable human being peers (each knowingly, willfully, and intentionally without legal presence as we both only have in common).
– I am no person (e.g. statutory person, trust, corporation, public office, etc) but a private non-lienable natural human being dweller at
The Natural Law since birth. 

Sincerely, In Lak’ech ala K’in,

    Without Prejudice, All Rights Reserved, AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

By: /s/———————————-©/, in propria persona, World Citizen    2017.04.26
            ——————————
©, in propria persona, World Citizen, living private non-lienable natural sentient being dweller   Date

Common Law Justice for Peace
Deputy Clerk for World Citizens
Private Attorney General


Besides making our voices heard, what else can be done about the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying?  Rather than sue the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying GENERAL COUNSEL BAR ATTORNEYS -whom are LITERALLY in cahoots with the BAR ATTORNEY JUDGES and DEFENSE ATTORNEYS (as all BAR ATTORNEYS WORK FOR THE COURT FIRST AND FOREMOST; before the client)-…

How about this as a solution to the clear and obvious corporate criminal behavior by public officials in the UNITED STATES, INC?

Wells Fargo Directors Face Wrath for Complicity In Bank Corruption

Wells Fargo Directors Face Wrath for Complicity In Bank Corruption

Board of directors dealt low-confidence vote, met with fierce protests in and outside of annual shareholder meeting

Met by fierce protests both inside and out the annual shareholder meeting in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida on Tuesday, members of the Wells Fargo board of directors refused to step down despite expressions of outrage and no confidence for their handling of a massive consumer banking scam.

The meeting marked the first for shareholders since the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) last September exposed the bank for opening millions of unauthorized accounts, which saddled many customers with fees and blemishes on their credit score, all in the name of meeting unrealistic sales quotas.

The massive scandal and fallout led to the resignation of former CEO John Stumpf and Tuesday’s meeting was expected to be the moment that the directors would be held to account.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) issued a series of tweets during the three-hour long meeting, advising those voting to demand accountability.

Inside the meeting, multiple shareholders stood up to express anger at the directors.

The New York Post reports:

During the first minutes of the meeting, shareholder Bruce Marks of the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America spurred mayhem as he demanded that board members to stand up and tell investors what they knew and when they knew it about the scandal […]

“Let them speak! Let them speak! Or are they just mouthpieces for the executives who allowed these predatory practices to occur?” Marks said.  [Chairman Stephen] Sanger tried to get Marks to sit down and wait until a specific Q&A session, telling him he was “out of order.” […]

“Wells Fargo has been out of order for years, and your response is, ‘Well, we’re sorry,'” Marks yelled. “Well, that’s not good enough!”

Sister Nora Nash, director of corporate responsibility for the Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia, also denounced the board, saying they “failed to set the tone and the culture” that it should have, according to NBC News.

At one point, shareholders introduced a motion to break up the banking giant. Rachel Curley, democracy associate with the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said of the request: “One of the key arguments for reducing the size of Wells Fargo… is that the bank is too big to manage. The massive cross-selling fraud attests to this problem.”

Another proposal which recommended the bank drop its funding of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) was also tabled. “You can drink water. You can’t drink oil,” Robert Taken Alive, a member of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Council, said during the meeting. “We’re looking for action. We’re not looking for policy or paper.”

Outside the meeting, campaigners held a day of action to draw attention to the “corrupt and unethical business practices” of the bank—from an overnight anti-pipeline protest at a New York City location to a flyover banner above the Florida meeting, which drew attention to Wells Fargo executive Jeff Grubb’s support for an anti-LGBT extremist group. Others took to Twitter to express their outrage with the banking giant, using the hashtag #ForgoWells.

“Around the country, people are saying that we’ve had enough of Wells Fargo really doing everything it can to extract as much value out of our communities as possible, and we’re fighting back,” Saqib Bhatti, director of the ReFund America Project who also is working on the Forgo Wells campaign, told CounterSpinrecently, explaining that the campaign “is really about getting cities, states, counties, school districts across the country to stop doing business with Wells Fargo.”

In addition to the day of action, Forgo Wells is circulating a petition that, Bhatti explained, “calls on the bank to divest from Dakota Access Pipeline, to stop investing in private prisons and immigration detention centers, to stop funding the payday lending industry, to stop its tremendous lobbying that it’s doing to try to influence our politics, to stop its predatory foreclosure practices, and a number of other demands that we raise.”

Ultimately, “all but three of the directors received less than 81 percent of the shares cast, with risk committee chairman Enrique Hernandez Jr. receiving the lowest tally, 53 percent,” reported Deon Roberts and Rick Rothacker with the Charlotte Observer‘s “Bank Watch,” who described the vote as “a strong rebuke.”

“It’s extremely rare for corporate directors to be voted out or even to have a poor showing in annual shareholder votes,” they noted. “Running unopposed, they typically receive voting percentages in the high 90s.” Chairman Sanger only received 56 percent. The three directors who fared well were all hired in the wake of the scandal.

The embattled board seemed to hold on with the help of Warren Buffett, whose company Berkshire Hathaway owns about 10 percent of shares.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License