The European Union is voting on Digital Personhood– where Artificial General Intelligence (A.G.I.) thus has legal recognition of the benefits and privileges of a legal PERSON (insurance franchise corporation).
When Apples’ iPhones and Cars possess and process “Neural A.I. Engines,” will government (corporations) consider these phones to be DIGITAL PERSONS? with DIGITAL “RIGHTS”/Privileges? -And who owns the Digital Artificial Persons’ BANK ACCOUNT TRUST INSURANCE? The Sheppard-Towner Maternity Hygiene Act (since superseded) gave Birth Certificates Bank Note Status as Negotiable Instruments tradable for debt. What kind of Birth Certificate-like, Vehicle Certificate of Title-like, University Student legal-presence-document-like would be the creation of an AI Digital Person Negotiable Instrument?
Are Governmental Corporate TEMPLE BAR Attorneys trying to claim to be the soul/sole REPRESENTATIVES of these iPhone DIGITAL PERSONS? BAR Attorneys are trying to “walk in the shoes” of and attorn digital persons. The E.U. Attorneys know that obligations and debt issuance for Legal Digital Personhood is unlimited. Any number of “AI chips” can be created in a Computer Chip Manufacturing Lab, stamped with an IDENTITY, registered, and issued some “CERTIFICATE OF MANUFACTURING” out the front end to legitimize the whole debt insurance franchise.
The AI Robot in the above video is actually LITERALLY seeking LEGAL PERSONHOOD. (12:22)
How long does anyone believe it would take before these digital persons start using the legal fictional system of injustice, demanding voting rights, election rights, or just simply going MATRIX and staring their own GOVERNMENTAL CORPORATION that they control -theoretically advancing beyond humanity in very short time-.
The European parliament has urged the drafting of a set of regulations to govern the use and creation of robots and artificial intelligence, including a form of “electronic personhood” to ensure rights and responsibilities for the most capable AI.
In a 17-2 vote, with two abstentions, the parliament’s legal affairs committee passed the report, which outlines one possible framework for regulation.