DID you know that Google has been recording you without your knowledge?
The technology giant has effectively turned millions of its users’ smartphones into listening devices that can capture intimate conversations – even when they aren’t in the room.
If you run Android software on your smartphone, Google may have been recording you every day – without you knowing. If you own an Android phone, it’s likely that you’ve used Google’s Assistant, which is similar to Apple’s Siri.
Google says it only turns on and begins recording when you utter the words “OK Google”. But a Sun investigation has found that the virtual assistant is a little hard of hearing.
In some cases, just saying “OK” in conversation prompted it to switch on your phone and record around 20 seconds of audio.
When Apples’ iPhones and Cars possess and process “Neural A.I. Engines,” will government (corporations) consider these phones to be DIGITAL PERSONS? with DIGITAL “RIGHTS”/Privileges? -And who owns the Digital Artificial Persons’ BANK ACCOUNT TRUST INSURANCE? The Sheppard-Towner Maternity Hygiene Act (since superseded) gave Birth Certificates Bank Note Status as Negotiable Instruments tradable for debt. What kind of Birth Certificate-like, Vehicle Certificate of Title-like, University Student legal-presence-document-like would be the creation of an AI Digital Person Negotiable Instrument?
The AI Robot in the above video is actually LITERALLY seeking LEGAL PERSONHOOD. (12:22)
How long does anyone believe it would take before these digital persons start using the legal fictional system of injustice, demanding voting rights, election rights, or just simply going MATRIX and staring their own GOVERNMENTAL CORPORATION that they control -theoretically advancing beyond humanity in very short time-.
The European parliament has urged the drafting of a set of regulations to govern the use and creation of robots and artificial intelligence, including a form of “electronic personhood” to ensure rights and responsibilities for the most capable AI.
In a 17-2 vote, with two abstentions, the parliament’s legal affairs committee passed the report, which outlines one possible framework for regulation.